El sC!b, 15-12-2007 a las 16:36 -0500, Richard Stallman escribiC3:
> Remember all the people who accused me of "lying" because at some time
> I described the presence of these recipes as "the ports system
> includes non-free software"? That whole tangent was based on taking
> my words out of cont
El sC!b, 15-12-2007 a las 16:36 -0500, Richard Stallman escribiC3:
> I suppose so. I don't see how anything could stop them. Whatever the
> changes gNewSense has made in the source code of Linux, a user could
> revert them if he wants to.
Change te code to the point that it doesn't accept taint
El sC!b, 15-12-2007 a las 09:57 -0700, Jack J. Woehr escribiC3:
> I profoundly respect both of you and know you both f2f. Richard
> has been my house guest twice. You're both tyrannical, bratty
> absolute tyrants, the difference being Richard is passive-aggressive
> and Theo is aggressive-aggress
El vie, 14-12-2007 a las 15:49 -0500, Richard Stallman escribiC3:
> Since both emacs and gcc contain code inside them which permit them to
> compile and run on commercial operating systems which are non-free,
> you are a slimy hypocrite.
>
> I see you are being your usual friendly self
2007/12/12, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> that there is a ports.tar.gz file on the CD.
>
> HOWEVER, that file is not installed by default, and the OpenBSD
> install program *does not even give the user the option* to install
> ports.tar.gz, be it from CD or otherwise. See here:
> http://www
El mar, 11-12-2007 a las 14:00 -0500, Richard Stallman escribiC3:
> My main basis for judging any distro is the policies it has adopted.
So a distro that comes (de-binaryzed) from ubuntu, that comes from
debian that any of them allow you to install a (nvidia) blob or any of
the non-free ports of
El sC!b, 01-12-2007 a las 17:55 +0100, Henning Brauer escribiC3:
> * Carl Roberso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-01 17:32]:
> > I don't have any CPU problem, but an impressive (vmstat -i) amount of
> > interrupts (something like 6000/s on external interfaces), and sometimes the
> > system drop packet
El sC!b, 10-11-2007 a las 03:57 -0600, Sean Darby escribiC3:
> > It is:
> > http://inigo.homeunix.net/art/art.tgz
>
> I think it's /files/art/art.tgz ?
Yes, it is. My apologies.
> In any case - those are impressive pics.
>
> Would it be possible to provide the same ones but in 1680x1050?
Th
El sC!b, 10-11-2007 a las 03:04 -0300, Limaunion escribiC3:
> IC1igo Tejedor Arrondo wrote:
> > El sC!b, 10-11-2007 a las 01:18 +0100, IC1igo Tejedor Arrondo escribiC3:
> >
> > oops
> >
> >> The sources (5.3Mm at 33k of upload):
> >> http://inigo.homeunix.net/art.tgz
> >
> > It is:
> > http
El sC!b, 10-11-2007 a las 01:18 +0100, IC1igo Tejedor Arrondo escribiC3:
oops
> The sources (5.3Mm at 33k of upload):
> http://inigo.homeunix.net/art.tgz
It is:
http://inigo.homeunix.net/art/art.tgz
Hello all
Some art, at slw spanish foul asymetric connection. The sources are
xcf, at 1600x1200.
Clarify that I am not a designer :)
I have make the typical "Powered by" stickers:
http://inigo.homeunix.net/files/art/powered_by_puffy_black.png
http://inigo.homeunix.net/files/art/powered_by
El vie, 20-10-2006 a las 23:10 -0400, Nick Holland escribis:
> Given the choices you have right now, I'd probably go with 3.9 now, keep
> the system as minimal as possible, then upgrade to 4.0 after it is
> released...that is, if your hardware is fully supported. It's pretty
> painless to do, and
Hello,
I have to do a clean install of a server, this weekend :)
I suppose that most suitable is -stable (3.9), and update when 4.0
happen to -release... but I would like to hear opinions if somebody
thinks different.
P.D. like has been commented in another thread, I would like to read
something
El dom, 15-10-2006 a las 13:38 +0100, Stuart Henderson escribis:
> On 2006/10/15 13:33, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote:
> > To the garage, only a network cable can go, because they do not fit more
> > in the tubes. I would like that everything was filtered, but I cannot
> > put a always runing machine
El dom, 15-10-2006 a las 14:41 +0200, ropers escribis:
> > My questions are:
> > If i send all the traffic direct to the garage, passing by the 8 ports,
> > and soon returns by the same cable, the machines in the 8 ports are in
> > danger some? (they would be in a diferent vlan, managed by firewa
Finally I'm going to have time, to put in house a firewall with openbsd,
to learn pf.
I'm not an expert in networks, so sorry for this OT, not related to
openbsd.
There are 3 questions: about Vlans, usb installation and DoS atacks...
The scene is the following one:
about 50 Mete
El sab, 30-09-2006 a las 15:10 +0200, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo escribis:
>
> It appears to me another doubt ... where i can start to hack this or to
> read doc about create openbsd drivers ?
I have find this [0] ?is valid and up-to-date for 3.9?
[0]
http://www.captain.at/howto-openbsd-device-driv
Hello,
I have a fucked raid controller, with a dark history about drivers.
It is a Aralion ultima raid controller (ata 133, with 0, 1 and 5 raid).
When I bought it, the box said "linux compatible"... it was only for
linux kernels 2.4.X ... no 2.6 driver at now (two years later)... also
now my ser
18 matches
Mail list logo
