On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jona Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-08-26, I??igo Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
>> "Supersede" gives me what I want. It just felt weird those entries
>> ended up on resolv.conf when I had not requested them.
>>
>> Thanks and sorry for the noise.
>
> This is expected behaviour
"Supersede" gives me what I want. It just felt weird those entries
ended up on resolv.conf when I had not requested them.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
2011/8/27 IC1igo Ortiz de Urbina :
> Hi all users and developers
>
> I simply noticed what I would call a weird behaviour on my 32 bit 4.9
> GE
Hi all users and developers
I simply noticed what I would call a weird behaviour on my 32 bit 4.9
GENERIC#671 box's dhclient, which I hope is not the expected behavior.
While reading RFC2131, I didnt find any sentence stating or implying
that is the desired behavior, as in a "server MUST...".
Say
Maybe u can set debug on iwn using ifconfig. That would help troubleshooting.
Also, show output of ifconfig
On 10/17/10, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i am runing -current with iwn and i notice a high
> number of Ierr's in netstat -ni.
> 0 would be ideal, right?
>
>
> i am using the lat
Mainstream open source monitoring is pretty much about munin, cacti,
nagios, zabbix. You can make any of these run on openbsd, AFAIK.
Even though they serve different purposes, my favourite (if no custom,
tailored solution is crafted) between these is cacti.
However, its pretty disappointing the
I'd love to see such a document available. Depending on the scope of
this documentation effort, it could even be bundled as a package.
On 8/8/10, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> It would be great if anybody could share whole .vim/ && .vimrc. I
> could write OpenBSD Vim C Programming manual once and for all
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Daniel Bareiro
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm trying to use tcpdump in OpenBSD 4.6 with a syntax similar to the
> following:
>
> # tcpdump -vvv udp and port 5060 or portrange 1-2000 -s0 \
> -i eht0 -w eavesdroppi
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac <
lscarne...@veltrac.com.br> wrote:
> There is a way to do time-based rules on pf? Something like "this packet
> will /pass/ from 10h to 13h" or "this packet will /pass/ until 22h, 13
> june". I mean, there is a built-in mechanic to do t
Err... do the homework first.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Digital Edge wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I am very much new to OpenBSD. I have two Sun UltraSparcT2( Niagara2)
> servers.
> I have install OpenBSD4.6 on that. But my intention is to install KVM/XEN
> on
> those box.
>
> Can anyone help me
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Could you please inform about the actual state of OpenSMTPd and when it
shall
> be fully integrated into OpenBSD ?
>
> Thanks.
You can keep an eye on its development by tracking commits on the CVS
repository.
I cant tell as I am
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> There is much more to do. You can find some ideas eg. here
> http://www.openbsd.org/papers/tuning-openbsd.ps . It's good idea to
> follow outputs of systat, vmstat and top for some time to find
> bottlenecks.
>
>
I recall a message in misc (wh
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:37:58PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
> > open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > i added theses lines :
> > > pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
> > > pass in
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Martin Schrvder wrote:
>
> > From: Martin Schrvder
> > To: OpenBSD general usage list
> > Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:07:01
> > Subject: Re: 4.6 arriving
> > X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
> >
> > 2009/10/9 Bret S. Lambert :
> > > O
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Jordi Espasa Clofent <
jordi.esp...@opengea.org> wrote:
> People, it is time to get your browsers over to
>> http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
>> and start running some money into the project.
>>
>
> Done.
> +1
>
> ;)
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Jordi Espasa Clofent
>
>
+
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
> halcon schrieb:
>
> El miC), 02-09-2009 a las 18:48 +, Daniel Bolgheroni escribiC3:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, halcon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hello
I am administering a small linux/windows lan from my laptop/OpenBSD-4.5
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, obvvbooo obvvbooo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to use memory as a disk/partition? Such as mount it to
> /mnt/mem or such things. I can't find information of this in the man pages
> and after googled,
Havent tried this before but you should be able to create yo
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Recently, I noticed an ssh user on one of my machines, who never logged on,
> is not visible with 'last', seems to have no terminal active, and is back
> immediately after a reboot.
> Hmm.
> root 13415 0.0 0.9 3280 2420 ?? Ss12:04P
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> 2009/5/25 irix :
>> And it will be added to the main tree?
>
> Let's see, no code, no mention of license, and no demonstration that
> it actually solves a/your problem. How can your question possibly be
> answered?
>
>
> Philip Guenther
>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-20, Joco Salvatti wrote:
>> Hi misc,
>>
>> I bought a Soekris Net5501 with a cryptographic card VPN1411
>> (Authentication, SHA-1 and MD5, Public Key, RSA, DSA, SSL, IKE and DH,
>> Hardware random number generator) and I would
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
>> Mehma,
>>
>> You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
>> achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
>> really interesting IMHO:
>>
>> http://
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really interesting IMHO:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/11/01/whats-new-in-bsd-42.html
Hope it helps you feel the need of trying pf _at home_ :)
On
I wonder if he is after something similar to portaudit[1] on OpenBSD?
[1]: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/security-portaudit.html
2009/5/16 Toma( Bod8ar
>
> I think that you are looking for tool which isn't available under
> OpenBSD.Here you must know what you are doing.Do you re
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Dan wrote:
> Daniel Ouellet(dan...@presscom.net)@2009.05.11 18:08:02 -0400:
>>> This new smtpd better be at least as good as qmail, otherwise - what's
>>> the point?
>>
>> For fun and learning dammit. It's been explain on undeadly before and in
>> the list. And be
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:48 PM, FRLinux wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
> wrote:
>> Why isn't Postfix included?
>> The license is not free, and thus can not be considered.
>>
>> And anyways, I found that switching from sendmail to postfix is
>> extremely easy in Op
24 matches
Mail list logo
