> On Jan 8, 2018, at 3:14 PM, Sterling Archer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Consus wrote:
>> On 16:37 Mon 08 Jan, Galaxy Júpiter wrote:
>>> Why OpenBSD now have their own native virtualisation layer?
>>> Why Theo de Raadt changed your opinion about virtual machines?
>>> What is th
Too bad there wasn’t a “Like” or “+1” button for mentioning Chuck Yerkes.
Must be 10 years since he died.
gg
—
g...@grub.net
PGP Key ID DB8BF93C
On Jun 10, 2014, at 1:06 AM, Dennis Davis
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, John D. Verne wrote:
>
>> From: John D. Verne
>> To: misc@openbsd.org
I ordered April 5. They havent arrived yet and Im only two provinces over.
Figure its because there is a shirt and two posters in the order as well. You
can never have enough OpenBSD loot.
g...@grub.net
PGP Key ID DB8BF93C
On Apr 30, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Matt Behrens wrote:
> On Apr 30
Welcome to misc@ :)
On 10 August 2012 20:49, wrote:
> Above all, I do not understand the aggressive tone...
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:29:51PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> >>
> >> The question of why 2 different BSDs have no issues including specific
> >> code into their base, while another
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:57AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> this is a bit besides the issue, methinks. There are several issues
> being discussed, and alluded to, here:
>
> 1. Theo not wanting to do business with Wim anymore.
That's between Theo and Wim.
> 2. The reasons(s) given why The
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> or about beer he gave people at the events?
Shhh, you'll anger The Europeans!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:37:29AM +0200, Richard Ben Aleya wrote:
> Theo,
[snip]
> In this affair *until you do not accept to give us detailed account
> reports*, you are in fraud and you are the potential stoler.
> And about this suspect company "The Computer Shop of Calgary Ltd.",
> your statu
"Billy Mays here for OpenBSD Just install it on your computer
and the holes are gone! Order now and get TWO
CD SETS ! That's TWO for the price of one but you have to
ORDER NOW! "
Yeah, that'll work!
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:17:24AM -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
> What four port Ethernet card is works well for OpenBSD?
>
> Does anyone have experience with any of them?
>
We're using 2 of the Soekris lan1641 4 port cards with no problem:
http://www.soekris.com/lan16x1.htm
Gord
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:24:52AM -0500, Gordon Grieder wrote:
>
> Fast forward and we've got these 2960G's everywhere, a couple of 3750G's
> doing the L3 work and feeding to the hardware out to the world. Nearly 20
> VLANs going through various trunks (single gig a
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:24:46AM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> I knew it was a matter of time before the "vlan insecurity" bullshit hit
> the fan. RTFA. Who says anything about "blindly trusting" switches?
> If you can't correctly configure VLANs on your switches, and filter on
> vlan(4) interfa
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:03:12PM +0200, David Vasek wrote:
>
> For the archives: unless it is specifically requested as
> rm -P
For some unknown reason this prompted me to look at the rm manpage for the
hell of it (yeah, bored and tired at the moment). There's an odd comment in
the STANDARDS se
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:22:38PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Me? I'd probably go with amd64, as practically speaking, i386 is
> slowly moving into the "legacy" category.
This coming from Nick "2.8-CURRENT Just Finished Compiling On My
68020-based Mac" Holland...
:)
Gord
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> I for one buy CDs every year, year after year.
>
> Best,
>
> ~Mayuresh
The CD sets you buy must be different than the ones I buy; mine don't
come with a ballot for voting on features.
Please proxy vote for me and check "[ ] Mo
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:25:19PM +1100, mufurcz wrote:
> johan beisser wrote:
> >
> >Fewer frames get corrupted, means less processing overhead per frame.
> Not true at all - if only the payload is changed.
Use NICs capable of TCP checksumming and the appropriate drivers, that
will mean less pro
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 12:25:16PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> It sure as hell does not make it a christian holiday. You might want to
> do some reading.
Christmas is just the day after my birthday. Today is the really
important day. :)
> Anyhow, this does not belong on a mailing list.
Tru
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Maybe it would have led to a shorter thread, but it would not have
> been accurate. My decision not to recommend OpenBSD was not based on
> personalities.
Interesting.
So have you sent these types of "unrecommendations" to othe
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:55:11AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
> And there's a few easter eggs
> hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve
> image...
Someone is giving it a go:
http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
Gord
We're setting up a testbed which will be used for simulting our WAN and
testing pending changes before pushing the changes out to active remote
equipment in other cities (hmmm... we have 2 labs in Calgary, maybe
Theo could be our pleasant help desk guy there... ha! ;))
Anyhow, I really want to add
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:16:07AM -0400, ICMan wrote:
> I admit that I am not the most up to date on the release process, but
> why is 4.0 not out on the FTP server yet if people are receiving it in
> their homes on CD? And how do I get on that list of people who get the
> pre-release?
You ha
Just received 3 sets here in Winnipeg (only two provinces away) Not
early enough for a "me first" video but... ;)
The nice cases are icing on the cake, well done!
gg
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:22:43PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Bryan Irvine wrote:
> > You win.
>
> I'm waiting for Nick Holland to chime in... he's probably got an SE/30
> in production, or maybe a VAXstation 2000.
Nick replied ages ago but his machine is still processing the outgoing
mail.
My problem is resolved. Offlist it was suggested that I build to
-current and it's working well (so far, anyhow; I rebooted it remotely
and the box came up)
Here are dmesgs, bsd and bsd.mp respectively. I made no changes at all,
these are plain vanilla GENERIC and GENERIC.MP included here for
deve
(sorry in advance for the previous confusing list noise)
The box is seeing both cores now (without building -current as yet)
after a BIOS reset BUT it hangs when using bsd.mp.
I've captured the output of 3.9 AMD64 booting up both with the
uniprocessor kernel and the mp kernel. When I enable bsd.m
A bit more. I reset the BIOS to its default and restarted. Now I'm
getting those disk complaints with bsd.mp. The machine is locked up now
but I've typed in the error message below in the spot where the machine
chokes.
It seems to be just before the working dmesg notices about dkcsum.
(I'm going
Hi,
I've installed 3.9 from CD on an AMD64X2 dual core machine. When booting
bsd.mp the system seems to only see one core (no CPU1 shows up)
I've only installed the OS and haven't done anything with the other two
hard disks (to be mirrored when running)
(as an aside, when I tried bsd.mp from 3.8
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:45:15PM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote:
> the partys starting over here in the west (usa). props if
> you can recognize my first server getting the honors.
> my thanks and my raised glass to Theo and the team.
My personal one arrived yesterday wrapped in a nice Stop Blob T
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:40:50AM -0600, David B. wrote:
> I just lost my entire development box to a hack this week, right through
> smoothwall's DMZ. I had apache up, postgresql installed with the mod_php as
> the middleware. All settings were default and the only port I had open was
> 80 t
I don't see it written anywhere where buying CDs or donating to the
project gives any of us users a "vote" into how things are done
within the project.
I've loved the OS for years and support the project, that's the only
"vote" I'm entitled to and I'm glad to exercise it.
Please let this thread d
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:59:02PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> only thing i guess i can offer is:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=108215148805896&w=2
>
> and to say that i've used a 1401 on a desktop and 1411s in soekris
> 4801s without issue(*) from 3.7 on up to
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:51:51AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/03/08 18:29, Gordon Grieder wrote:
> > The speed with and without userland crypto enabled was the same
>
> Doesn't necessarily mean anything - overheads might be doing this.
See below.
> The
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:07:30PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> including the commandlines of said benchmarks would have been hot,
> in this case.
>
> i'm inclined to ask how you determined the benchmarks prove that
> it isn't used ( watching 'systat vmstat', time(1)'ing them, etc
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:23:17PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> We have activated the pre-orders for OpenBSD 3.9...
W HO!!!
"It pays to order early! You stupid, cheap fuckers!"
Gord
Hi,
I recently picked up some Soekris gear for work. One part was a vpn1401
crypto accelerator. OpenBSD 3.8 fresh from the CD sees the card OK but
won't use it. Quick script to turn userland crypto off and on with
benchmarks proves that.
I thought it may be a machine-dependant problem (it's for
that should be nuked from orbit."
Sounds like you need an enema.
--
Gordon GriederJoin us, get cracking!
www.grub.net www.distributed.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
th with the then-unknown shirt design, it
looks pretty cool.
Thanks man, now I feel like a junkie with the shakes who just heard a
new load of heroin arrived in town. Shoot me up baby...
gord
--
Gordon GriederJoin us, get cracking!
www.grub.net www
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:49:28PM +0100, ed wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:01:10 +0200
> Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heh, you don't know `God save the queen' from the sex pistols :-)
>
> I have the album if anyone wants it... #8, I'm bored of it, it's
> very 80's UK punk.
Motorhea
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:16:13PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
> Here in the US, a plain (uncoiled) circuit between two points is
> either called an "alarm circuit" or a "dry pair" if that's what you
> got, and you're within distance requirements (wire feet), you can do a
> number of different th
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:34:16AM +, Jason George wrote:
> This is the whole point of this: http://accoom.kd85.com/
Wow, very neat. Thanks for enlightening me!
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:41:44PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> sorry for being off-topic, i am able to rent a pair of twist line (a
> circuit) between my home and and friends one. I wonder if there exist
> and ethernet extender device that could connect an ethernet cable to a
>
y. My cable provider's residential IPs are on several blacklists,
I've set up SMTP forwarding to the ISP's servers and All Is Well.
Yeah, it sucks that I can't send direct without fear of being dropped
but for less than a couple of bucks a day I can't complain too loudly.
Hi,
We've been testing a squid proxy at my workplace (~300 machines
locally) on a smaller group of 60 machines. (used the Windows'
"autodetect proxy" thing with some javascript on a local webserver to
get get our 'volunteers')
Our new machine arrived which will be replacing this test unit. P4, 3.
Why are some people starting off replies to this thread with a
statement to the effect of "I am a christian" as if it's a badge of
honour? It labels them as kooks, no different that someone reading tea
leaves, practicing astrology or believing in Nostradamus' quatrains.
And, like my reply, it has
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 06:31:58PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Apparently. You got me to do your Googling for you.
> (sick fact: I had done the googling before noticing the cheap shot! :)
Touche.
> A little googling showed the specs. 33MHz, maximum of 64MHz. Probably
> in the neighborhood o
Before I start following sparc@ (if I go ahead with this): I recently
"inherited" a Sun ELC. It's an ancient all-in-one thing that looks
kinda neat.
According to the sparc page it's a supported model but I'm not sure how
beefy this thing would be. Obviously it's no dual Opteron box but would
I be
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:40:27AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> May 19, 2005.
>
> We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 3.7.
[snip]
Where can I download the ISO images?
Just kidding, put down the axe!
47 matches
Mail list logo
