Hi misc,
I'm looking at how to apply the use of the stick-address option. Can
someone confirm for me that I only need to use the option for the
first pool based rule, and that any subsequent rule utilising that
same pool spec will also have the option applied ?
IE.
I have 2 rules as follows:
p
Hi misc,
I'm interested to know if it's possible to abstract address pools such
that I could do something like one of the following:
--
table { ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1), ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) }
...
pass in log on $int_if \
route-to { ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1), ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) } round-robin \
2009/9/3 David Harrison :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm setting up a firewall with 2 load-balanced redundant Internet
> links. To ensure the host itself can load balance its outbound
> connections (and fail-over correctly if one of those links dies) I'm
> configuring ifstated to
Hi all,
I'm setting up a firewall with 2 load-balanced redundant Internet
links. To ensure the host itself can load balance its outbound
connections (and fail-over correctly if one of those links dies) I'm
configuring ifstated to handle updating the default routes for the
host based on a simple p
2008/8/19 Aaron Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David Harrison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently theorizing that this is because I have two distinct
>> interfaces (carp1, em1) both with IPs on the same subnet
Hey all,
I've got a CARP rig setup to balance an IP between my 2 firewall hosts
(192.168.0.100), with each firewall also having an IP on their
physical interface (em1) so I can hit each machine individually
(192.168.0.11, 192.168.0.12) no matter who is currently carp master.
Config for the intern
I just upgraded my firewall to 3.7, but I've found my VPN is now not
working. I keep seeing "NAT detected" messages, but both machines have
real IPs so it doesn't make sense. The client machine is a 3.6 install,
and the server machine was a 3.4 machine which I used the media CD to
upgrade. I
7 matches
Mail list logo
