ice supervisor) so I already
have the logs, but there is/was nothing unusual in the logs.
Thanks!
Regards,
cstamas
--
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas
God does not play dice.
-- Einstein
elps:
http://users.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas/priv/bgpd.conf
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
cstamas
--
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas
ata
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksum: out of data
cksu
On 04/16, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:15:11PM +0200, Csillag Tamas wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I have a two redundant OpenBSD firewalls with carp. Both is version 4.0.
> >
> > I am planning to upgrade the one in the BACKUP state to -curre
the same time to retain a proper failover capability.
IIRC simmilar change happend at 3.8, that's why I am asking.
Thanks in advance,
cstamas
--
Life is complex - It has real and imaginary parts.
-- Andrea Leistra
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas
> myself
>
> Now xterm with antialiasing + xterm -fa 'Andale Bold' -fs 14 -rightbar is
> looking just gorgeous
>
> thanks!
I prefer:
xterm -fa 'Terminus' -fs 14 -rightbar
--
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas
load both cbl and njabl into spamd, but I stopped because
they grow too big and won't fit. Now I use it at my real MTA.
cstamas
--
Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it.
-- Chinese Proverb
CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas
On 08/08, Paul Pruett wrote:
> Tried to use CBL for spamd.conf, it was a bust.
> may have been sysadmin err0r/misunderstanding..:).
>
> Anyone else successfully using CBL for /usr/libexec/spamd-setup ?
Yes
> It appears that the CBL black list has about 1,744,279 entries
> The CBL list is a b
Hi,
On 06/21, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would it be possible to change this behaviour so that the whitelisting
> is done as soon as the same sender/receiver pair is seen again,
> ignoring the ip address? This could speed up things a bit.
I think it is a better way to just ignore th
9 matches
Mail list logo