Hi all,
I've seen some conversations in the past regarding aggregation of
multiple xDSL connections to a main office in order to benefit from
much larger bandwidth at that office and to have some sort of fault
tolerance. I'm wondering how this could be achieved. To add
complexity, these xDSL conne
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
> Since the openssl update (I run the latest amd64 snapshot from
> 10/04/2010), things like openssh are broken.
>
I tried a fresh install with the latest snapshot and all is ok (my
bad). But a make build with latest sources
Hi,
Since the openssl update (I run the latest amd64 snapshot from
10/04/2010), things like openssh are broken.
$ ssh blurp.domain.loc
ssh:/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.19.0: undefined symbol 'sha256_block_data_order'
lazy binding failed!
zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) ssh blurp.domain.loc
--
cb
Hi,
I know this is totally unsupported, I'm on my own with this shit...
blahblahblah. Just wanted to report... if someone has an idea.
I try to build my system with make -j 4. This is on current/amd64.
When I use :
$ sudo nice make -j 4 build
Everything is OK, the build is fine.
But with :
$ nic
Hi,
Building -current/amd64 fails today for me with vis(3) related commits :
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -DAPIWARN -DYP
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/yp -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/usr/src/lib/libc
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/gdtoa -I/usr/src/lib/libc/arch/amd64/gdtoa
-DINFNAN_CHECK -DMULTIPLE_THREA
Hi all,
I'd like to experiment parallel building with 'make -j' and I have a
question that I can't find any answer in the man page.
I have the impression that 'make -j' is only effective when just
invoking "make" in a kernel compile or "make build" in a
userland/xenocara build.
It doesn't seem t
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Joe Gidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> When I upgraded to -current, I kept the firmware downloaded before on
> damien's website (3.0) :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ pkg_info | grep iwi
> iwi-firmware-3.0Firmware binary ima
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM, John Bartoszewski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Before, all I had to do was "ifconfig iwi0 up" for the antenna light to
>> blink.
>> Now I can't find the way to start it.
>>
>> "ifconfig iwi0 chan" don't find a thing and of course "dhclient iwi0"
>> tell me "no li
Hi all,
It has been a long time since I haven't use the iwi device on my
laptop (IBM T43).
Before, all I had to do was "ifconfig iwi0 up" for the antenna light to blink.
Now I can't find the way to start it.
"ifconfig iwi0 chan" don't find a thing and of course "dhclient iwi0"
tell me "no link".
Hi,
I look for a quiet, small, energy saving and well cooled machine to
make a webserver. I need i386 or amd64. I thought about an apple mac
mini (i know...apple...). How the latest models (core 2 duo) are
supported under openbsd (integrated nic, bsd.mp...) ?
Cheers,
Cedric
Hi all,
I follow current and it seems to me strange that xenocara is under
/usr/src. I have my src tree in /usr/src and xenocara in
/usr/src/xenocara. So when I update my src tree with cvs it seems that
I have problems : on one computer (src tree originally from CD) cvs
never finish and on an oth
On 9/6/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006/09/06 14:28, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
> > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
>
> I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with
On 9/6/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote:
> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"?
Mails are redistributed from t
he subject.
But it's not satisfying enough and I must study an other solution
locally.
I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly.
Maybe you have similar cases with spamassassin+clamav or relaydb,
procmail ?
Regards,
Cedric Brisseau
14 matches
Mail list logo
