On 8/31/06, Charles M. Hannum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, defining (poorly) the OS to include so much else has been a
liability for NetBSD in many ways. It has massively slowed the adoption
of new software versions (e.g. GCC), for one. It also contributed to
the perception that a bette
On 8/31/06, Gilles Gravier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahem... so no Apache... but why games, X11, compiler?
So don't install the games set, the X set, or the comp set if you
don't want that stuff.
I think the point I'm trying to make is, apache is certainly not
something *most* people will use
On 8/31/06, Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BSD is about an operating system, not about a kernel.
Bingo. Good point. This point is lost sometimes.
I believe NetBSD has the proper philosophy in regards to the entire OS
as well. I don't want apache built in, for instance.
Andy
On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
Let me start by saying I'm probably not qualified to reply to this
thread, but I was never worried about making a fool out of myself
before so here goes...
I am a form
4 matches
Mail list logo
