Re: Dual boot with 2 openbsd

2024-07-16 Thread 04-psyche . totter
I don't use RAID1 because the disks have vastly different capacity (one is 4 times the size of the other). > On 17 Jul 2024, at 00:34, Benjamin Stürz > wrote: > > On 7/16/24 10:57 PM, 04-psyche.tot...@icloud.com wrote: >> Hi all! >> I want to setup a dual boot system, with 2 OpenBSD system, an

Re: Dual boot with 2 openbsd

2024-07-16 Thread Benjamin Stürz
On 7/16/24 10:57 PM, 04-psyche.tot...@icloud.com wrote: Hi all! I want to setup a dual boot system, with 2 OpenBSD system, and I wanted to run it past you guys, to see if the idea makes sense (and make sure I implement it correctly). It is for a system that I will not be able to access physic

Dual boot with 2 openbsd

2024-07-16 Thread 04-psyche . totter
Hi all! I want to setup a dual boot system, with 2 OpenBSD system, and I wanted to run it past you guys, to see if the idea makes sense (and make sure I implement it correctly). It is for a system that I will not be able to access physically easily. So I bought 2 drives. My idea is: - Instal

Re: Mouse profile and behavior changed to wtf after Xenocara compiling

2024-07-16 Thread chohag
I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding here. Anon Loli writes: > Hello list, after I compiled ... Once you have crossed this Rubicon you are a developer and On Your Own. Not that OpenBSD was ever going to hold anyone's hand. Use the source, Luke. > Does this belong in @tech? No. Mat

Re: default route for a subset of addresses

2024-07-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
Your route-to should specify the IP to send packets to, not an interface (which would expand to the _local_ address on that interface) -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 16 July 2024 20:17:08 Sonic wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 6:17 PM Stuart Henderson wrote: Your ma

Re: default route for a subset of addresses

2024-07-16 Thread Sonic
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 6:17 PM Stuart Henderson wrote: > Your main options are to use PF route-to (config for this is reasonably > obvious, but make sure that wgaip is set to allow the relevant addresses), > > route-to is reasonably obvious. The problem I'm having with route-to is the packets go

Re: Mouse profile and behavior changed to wtf after Xenocara compiling

2024-07-16 Thread Anon Loli
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:00:46PM -0400, Benjamin Raskin wrote: > > I compiled everything > . What's your rationale? Why compile everything from scratch in the first > place? 1st of all it's cool as fuck! 2nd of all I was a contributing tester for the AMD 17 HD audio bug (something like that) a

Re: Mouse profile and behavior changed to wtf after Xenocara compiling

2024-07-16 Thread Benjamin Raskin
> I compiled everything . What's your rationale? Why compile everything from scratch in the first place? On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:49 PM Anon Loli wrote: > > Hello list, after I compiled Xenocara on my computer (I compiled everything) > as > commanded by release(8) sacred paper, my "gaming mous

Mouse profile and behavior changed to wtf after Xenocara compiling

2024-07-16 Thread Anon Loli
Hello list, after I compiled Xenocara on my computer (I compiled everything) as commanded by release(8) sacred paper, my "gaming mouse" changed it's behavior by A LOT. 1st change that I noticed is that the mouse profile which has been set by my using original software has seemingly been wiped: the

7.5: wireguard problem after running "ifconfig wg0 -wgpeer xxxx..."

2024-07-16 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, I've got >20 wgpeer entries in hostname.wg0 on my VPN gateway (OpenBSD 7.5), each for a road-warrior laptop running Linux, MacOS or Windows. After removing 3 peers on the command line last Thursday (using ifconfig wg0 -wgpeer 9AQR8zfadzA+fF5UsRCLNHd6Ljs= for each) some

Re: default route for a subset of addresses

2024-07-16 Thread Sonic
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:41 AM Zé Loff wrote: > Apologies, I misread your question. Sorry for the noise. My query was not as clear as it could have been. My apologies and thank you for your input. Chris

Re: Apache chroot ?

2024-07-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024-07-15, J Doe wrote: > I know in the past (before OpenBSD's httpd), the Apache package on > OpenBSD was packaged to run in a chroot. Does this still hold for > Apache 2.4.61 on OpenBSD 7.5 ? The version of Apache httpd (1.x) that used to be in the base OS (before it was replaced by nginx)

Re: default route for a subset of addresses

2024-07-16 Thread Zé Loff
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 09:20:49PM -0400, Sonic wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 5:36 PM Zé Loff wrote: > > If it is specific for a subset of addresses, and not the default > > route then... it won't be the default. It'll be a specific route for > > those addresses. > > I mean a default route fr