Re: smtpd warn: not enough disk space

2024-07-06 Thread Jeremy Evans
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 9:16 PM Christian Schulte wrote: > Just wondering how the postgresql > port is configured. Really should setup quotas automatically when > pkg_adding in a way, just to ensure, that no one ever runs into a > situation, that there is no way out of a disk full situation. > I'

ripd processes not exchanging routing tables

2024-07-06 Thread jrmu
Greetings, I am now trying to figure out how to run ripd(8) to replace the static routes. I have two machines I'm trying to configure routing for, R1 and R2. I suspect the two ripd processes I configured for R1 and R2 are sending multicast packets but not actually listening/replying to each other

Re: tcpdump on openbsd

2024-07-06 Thread Mik J
Hello Otto, Diana, Thank you for your answers. Otto, thank you for your work on tcpdump. Regards Le vendredi 5 juillet 2024 à 17:32:29 UTC+2, deich...@placebonol.com a écrit : Take a look at OpenBSD src web interface for tcpdump, you'll see tcpdump is maintained by OpenBSD. If you

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Sebastien Marie
Anon Loli writes: > > (my last email on this thread, about datetime "version check" is needed to > understand the meaning of this) > or make(1) can handle this when say building /usr/src, it can check datetime > of > the source files (.c, .h), and then the datetime of object files (.o).. now > th

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread deich...@placebonol.com
what you suggest sounds like a really bad idea Time is an imperfect construct, with your suggestion you have to have 100% confidence that system local time is always perfect. I've been doing this a long time and can recall many instances when an issue arose because time was off. On July 6, 2

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Sebastien Marie
Anon Loli writes: > > I understand, I was a programmer and hopefully will be again.. > In my opinion the CVS itself should take care in preventing the > "missbehaving", > doesn't git do that already? I hope that we're on the same page.. > I'm just not always understanding/understandable.. CVS (o

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Anon Loli
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:40:27PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 01:49:56PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > Anon Loli writes: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 07:10:37AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > > > > I see, so this full rebuild (ignoring object files) is most us

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Anon Loli
on Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:40:27PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 01:49:56PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > Anon Loli writes: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 07:10:37AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > > > > I see, so this full rebuild (ignoring object files) is most us

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Anon Loli
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 01:49:56PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > Anon Loli writes: > > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 07:10:37AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > > I see, so this full rebuild (ignoring object files) is most useful when for > > example fetching an update to the CVS repository? > >

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Sebastien Marie
Anon Loli writes: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 07:10:37AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > I see, so this full rebuild (ignoring object files) is most useful when for > example fetching an update to the CVS repository? > Is that what you meant by old and new elements? > > But as far as I understand

Re: (boring) why is KEEPKERNELS unset and obj gets cleaned?

2024-07-06 Thread Anon Loli
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 07:10:37AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > Anon Loli writes: > > > Hi list > > I marked this thread as "(boring)" so to not anger snowflakes with > > boring/stupid questions. > > > > So this thread's question is: I found out that when recompiling the base > > system I thin