On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:15:35AM +0800, Jazzi Hong wrote:
> Fixed, thanks Otto. I checked this drive and found an error of "BAD
> SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG", it's fixed in the end. So I changed
> the last option of the fstab file from ZERO to TWO thus the command
> fsck can check it automa
Fixed, thanks Otto. I checked this drive and found an error of "BAD
SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG", it's fixed in the end. So I changed
the last option of the fstab file from ZERO to TWO thus the command
fsck can check it automatically. Thank you all for the great help, I
am so happy my little NA
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:27 PM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2023-05-31, Mark (obsd) wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:59 AM Chris Cappuccio
> wrote:
> >
> >> Samuel Jayden [samueljaydan1...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> > Hi again,
> >> >
> >> > Just for the record:
> >> > I've d
On 2023-05-31, Mark (obsd) wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:59 AM Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
>> Samuel Jayden [samueljaydan1...@gmail.com] wrote:
>> > Hi again,
>> >
>> > Just for the record:
>> > I've downgraded to OpenBSD 7.2 (reinstalled) and everything is working
>> like
>> > a
0
C Japan
P Niigata (Echigo)
F 4 times a year
O Echigo BSD Users Group
M inqu...@ebug.jp
U https://www.ebug.jp
N *BSD
On 5/31/23 05:03, Valdrin MUJA wrote:
> Hi Claudio & David,
>
> Wireguard can work behind NAT. In that case maybe the solution is
wireguard + BGP.
I've been using OSPF over wireguard for several years now. It works
quite well. You just have to add `wgaip 224.0.0.0/8' to allow multicast
over
Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:59 AM Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Samuel Jayden [samueljaydan1...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > Just for the record:
> > I've downgraded to OpenBSD 7.2 (reinstalled) and everything is working
> like
> > a charm again.
> > I don't know what is wrong with
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:25:06PM +0800, Jazzi Hong wrote:
> Thanks for all the help. Hereby is the result of command `disklabel
> sd0`, seems the drive is well detected by failed mounted:
>
> > $ doas disklabel sd0
> # /dev/rsd0c:
> type: SCSI
> disk: SCSI disk
> label: SAMSANG ST1000LM
> duid:
Thanks for all the help. Hereby is the result of command `disklabel
sd0`, seems the drive is well detected by failed mounted:
> $ doas disklabel sd0
# /dev/rsd0c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: SAMSANG ST1000LM
duid: 2b6c2b5b929f9a55
16 partitions:
#size offset fstyp
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:21:15AM +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 05:25:07PM +0800, Jazzi Hong wrote:
> > You made the point, thank you Maksim.
> > I checked /mnt/hdd and nothing there.
> > > # cat /etc/fstab
> > 1593ab2ee369c420.b none swap sw
> > 1593ab2ee369c420.a / ffs rw 1 1
On 2023-05-31, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
> Hi misc@,
>
> while scrolling through my /var/log/messages I found this entry:
> netstat: vfprintf %s NULL in " %2d %-5.16s"
>
> I tracked down the issue to line 278 of /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/show.c:
>> printf(" %2d %-5.16s", rtm->rtm_priority,
>> if_
Hi misc@,
while scrolling through my /var/log/messages I found this entry:
netstat: vfprintf %s NULL in " %2d %-5.16s"
I tracked down the issue to line 278 of /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/show.c:
printf(" %2d %-5.16s", rtm->rtm_priority,
if_indextoname(rtm->rtm_index, ifbuf))
It appears to m
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 05:25:07PM +0800, Jazzi Hong wrote:
> You made the point, thank you Maksim.
> I checked /mnt/hdd and nothing there.
> > # cat /etc/fstab
> 1593ab2ee369c420.b none swap sw
> 1593ab2ee369c420.a / ffs rw 1 1
> 1593ab2ee369c420.e /var ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
> 2b6c2b5b929f9a55.i
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 05:25:07PM +0800, Jazzi Hong wrote:
> You made the point, thank you Maksim.
>
> I checked /mnt/hdd and nothing there.
>
> > # cat /etc/fstab
> 1593ab2ee369c420.b none swap sw
> 1593ab2ee369c420.a / ffs rw 1 1
> 1593ab2ee369c420.e /var ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
> 2b6c2b5b929
Hi Claudio & David,
Wireguard can work behind NAT. In that case maybe the solution is wireguard +
BGP.
Infact, I already tried this and wanted to use BGP multipath but failed and
sent it to the misc list in a separate mail.
(I wrote gre + bgp in the related mail, my aim was not to prolong my w
What do you get if you run the below commands? OpenBSD defaults to
using UDP for NFS. Linux I believe defaults to using TCP. I would have
expected a more explicit Portmap error though if it was that.
showmount -e hostname
rpcinfo -t hostname mountd
rpcinfo -u hostname mountd
rpcinfo -t hostname n
You made the point, thank you Maksim.
I checked /mnt/hdd and nothing there.
> # cat /etc/fstab
1593ab2ee369c420.b none swap sw
1593ab2ee369c420.a / ffs rw 1 1
1593ab2ee369c420.e /var ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
2b6c2b5b929f9a55.i /mnt/hdd ffs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
> # doas sysctl hw.disknames
h
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 06:39:27PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
> > On 31 May 2023, at 18:33, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 08:35:45AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 27 May 2023, at 21:40, Stuart Henderson
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2023-05-27, Vald
> On 31 May 2023, at 18:33, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 08:35:45AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 27 May 2023, at 21:40, Stuart Henderson
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2023-05-27, Valdrin MUJA wrote:
Does OpenBSD have routed based IPsec support?
>>>
>>> Not
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 08:35:45AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
> > On 27 May 2023, at 21:40, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-05-27, Valdrin MUJA wrote:
> >>Does OpenBSD have routed based IPsec support?
> >
> > Not yet.
>
> while you wait, it might be possible to configure
The /mnt/hdd partition on your NFS server might just be not mounted
which does not prevent nfs service from successfully serving an empty
directory.
Or one of your two nfs clients might have deleted all your files and you
did not notice this.
On Wed May 31 09:27:04 2023, Maksim Rodin wrote:
> Hell
21 matches
Mail list logo
