Re: Please clarify /usr partition size for 6.9 release

Answered my own question. Jay > My partition size for /usr is 2.0G. Currently using 1.1G, and df is > reporting 783M available. > > Can I upgrade from 6.8 release to 6.9 release without the upgrade failing due > to lack of space in /usr? > > I'm thinking I'm ok. > > In the future, would it be

Re: Error making 002_libx11.patch.sig

You are not building using the correct procedure. Sorry, we don't have time to teach that. Please use the syspatches, or the snapshots, or learn to do full builds. The latter is fully documented in manual pages, and reaching for the mailing list is inappropriate. Jonathan Drews wrote: > OpenB

Error making 002_libx11.patch.sig

OpenBSD 6.9 GENERIC.MP#473 amd64 Hi Folks: I am trying to patch Xenocara with 002_libx11.patch.sig. I first applied make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj. Afterwards I get the following error message when I do make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper build: checking that generated files are newer than configure

OpenBSD 6.8 Errata 019 Failed

configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first *** Error 1 in . (/usr/X11R6/share/mk/bsd.xorg.mk:158 'config.status') *** Error 2 in /usr/xenocara/lib/libX11 (/usr/X11R6/share/mk/bsd.xorg.mk:196 'build') I don't understand what the error message is tellin

Please clarify /usr partition size for 6.9 release

My partition size for /usr is 2.0G. Currently using 1.1G, and df is reporting 783M available. Can I upgrade from 6.8 release to 6.9 release without the upgrade failing due to lack of space in /usr? I'm thinking I'm ok. In the future, would it be advisable to increase this partitions size? I

Re: poor ethernet network performance

Keegan Saunders [kee...@undefinedbehaviour.org] wrote: > I'm noticing that my OpenBSD desktop with a Realtek 8168 ethernet controller > (re(4) driver) is experiencing slow network speeds on OpenBSD 6.9 (not > recent, has been an issue before) > Why not include a dmesg? How do you expect anyone to

Re: OpenBSD 6.9 and PHP version

On 2021-05-18, Steve Williams wrote: > Hi, > > When I upgraded to OpenBSD 6.9 then did the pkg_add -u, I got > php-php-7.4.18 installed. > > How do I know if it's "safe" to delete the old php-7.3.28 and all the > associated modules? > > I know I'll have to migrate my ".ini" file changes to the n

Re: sane-backends permission problems

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:21:16PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote: > > > Predrag Punosevac writes: > > > > > > > predrag@oko$ scanimage -L > > > > > > > > No scanne

Re: sane-backends permission problems

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:21:16PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote: > > Predrag Punosevac writes: > > > > > predrag@oko$ scanimage -L > > > > > > No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, > > > check that

Re: sane-backends permission problems

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:21:16PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote: > Predrag Punosevac writes: > > > predrag@oko$ scanimage -L > > > > No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, > > check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the > > sane-find-scanner t

Re: OpenBSD 6.9 and PHP version

Am 17.05.21 18:20 schrieb Steve Williams: > Hi, > > When I upgraded to OpenBSD 6.9 then did the pkg_add -u, I got php-php-7.4.18 > installed. > > How do I know if it's "safe" to delete the old php-7.3.28 and all the > associated modules? You will have to check the manual (readmes, manpages, home