+1 for Symbol here. Have used them in factory environments and I can’t
recall one ever failing.
If buying used, be sure you can get the documentation for it, as these are
often configurable (eg. continuous vs. triggered scanning) via scanning
special barcodes.
John
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 07:20
What happened previously:
Installed 6.7
Installed firmware
Fetched source from 6.7 stable
Built everything in syspatch 001-013
Installed everything in syspatch 001-013
Rebooted
Built kernel
Rebooted
In trying to build userland, I encountered the following:
...
===> usr.sbin/trpt
===> usr.sbin/unb
On 2020-07-24 03:16, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
Hi,
Which of the following legacy CPU types is best suited for very busy web
server httpd+slowcgi
Niagara CPU Such as T2 - More parallel Threads and Low power per single
thread
Sparc64 CPU such as VI, VII - Fewer threads but more computing power p
> Better to look for an M3000 or M4000 or as suggested for a T4-1
M3000 don't work. The firmware locks up very badly.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Replying back on-list, I don't do support-type mails off-list, and other
> people know more about sparc64 hardware than me.
>
> On 2020/07/26 22:38, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > For legacy, single-core CPU's suc
Replying back on-list, I don't do support-type mails off-list, and other
people know more about sparc64 hardware than me.
On 2020/07/26 22:38, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> For legacy, single-core CPU's such as Sparc64 V.
> Would OpenBSD cope well with more number of CPU's or less as i
6 matches
Mail list logo
