According to Damien Miller:
>this is pretty much possible now, by enabling the experimental support
for the XMSS PQ signature algorithm
in the SSH
https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/02/21/145300/serious-quantum-computers-are-finally-here-what-are-we-going-to-do-with-them/
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/post-quantum-ssh/
https://openquantumsafe.org/
Why not to add post quantum algos to the SSH mainline to make them easi
I have IPv6 point to point connection. Going to transmit IPv4 inside IPv6
tunnel.
client has IPv6 ::::2
gateway has IPv6 ::::1
Martin
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, May 8, 2020 8:55 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
> From your description, you want to pass IPv4
I'm running OpenBSD 6.6 operating as an inter-VLAN and border router
using pf. Recently I wanted to use a nondefault state timeout for some
UDP traffic traversing from my voip subnet to a provider off site.
Within pf, there are three rules involved. The first is for traffic
coming from the voi
Martin
If I understand your question correctly ...
PC1 --IPV6 Gateway1
so you have a public ipv6 address on PC1 and Gateway 1
hostname.gif should specify the real ipv6 address of PC1
and the real IPv6 address of gateway1 in it to establish the tunnel
#setup
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:51:21PM +0900, rgc wrote:
> macppc.html shows i can do this via "wsconsctl -w XXX".
> ** note that wsconsctl doesn't have a "-w" option so macppc.html might need
> to be updated **
sent a patch to remove the "-w" in the HTML file
wsconsctl code show the "w" option is for
Good choice. Do they provide IP addresses from data-center's pool where VPSes
located or from ISP range?
Martin
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, May 8, 2020 5:51 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> (This is a cut-and-paste of something I sent in response to a similar
> question about FreeBSD
Which 'quantum' resistant algorithms can be used right now to prevent data
decryption in future by 'quantum' computers (when they can do this) of
currently collected data flows?
Martin
Last thing I have to understand about gif(4) and IPv6 tunneling.
Should I set gif(4) 'inet6 alias' = the same IPv6 of the local end of IPv6
tunnel interface or just set 'inet6 alias' for gif(4) in tunnel's IPv6 subnet?
Martin
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, May 8, 2020 4:41 PM, Tom
I got mixed feelings...
This list seems very cherry-picked from people with a predetermined
disliking of OpenBSD. If you check out the mitigations tab, you won't be
able to find anything new or undocumented there. It looks like we as a
community triggered a guy who retaliated by key-smashing toget
I have a roadwarrior client with traffic to 0.0.0.0/0 going
through a remote gateway. I would like to also send _some_
traffic to a more specific, different host.
However, traffic to that more spefic host always tries to
use the remote gateway's SPI. In other words, once I say
"0.0.0.0/0," I can't
Dear all,
I'm enjoying OpenBSD on PC Engines hardwares called APU2:
https://www.pcengines.ch/apu2.htm
There is 3 led, which could be very usefull to deliver informations to
the endusers, but I never could control them with OpenBSD /o\
Is any way to make it work ?
On PCEngines forum I got the fo
>From your description, you want to pass IPv4 inside a tunnel that has an outer
>protocol of IPv6. Your resulting hostname.gif0 looks like the exact opposite
>of your description (IPv6 inside the tunnel with IPv4 outer).
Clarify what you need please. Provide your existing hostname.if files for
Thanks for confirmation.
Hope I understand gif(4) functionality right from its configuration. Can I set
/etc/hostname.gif0 from client's side only like below:
/etc/hostname.gif0
tunnel 10.20.30.40 195.203.212.221
inet6 alias 2001:05a8::0001::::8542 128
dest 2001:05a8::0001:00
(This is a cut-and-paste of something I sent in response to a similar
question about FreeBSD last month.)
I've been a customer of Panix (panix.com) for years and they're terrific.
Inexpensive, flexible, responsive support, VERY high clue level, and
proactive about patches/fixes. (There have been
I have IPv6 unidirectional tunnel between two machines. One of them is gateway,
another one is a client.
The goal is to route IPv4 packets over IPv6 tunnel from client to gateway and
NAT IPv4 packet to egress on gateway machine.
May I use gif(4) for it or what is the best approach to traverse IP
Hi Martin,
If I understand your question correctly
you need 2 endpoints to the tunnel...
for gif(4) or any gre((4) based tunnel
you need the interface setup on both the client and the server (gateway)
if you have a gateway serving multiple clients... then you need one
interface per client that y
Hi,
starting a couple of days ago, applications linked against gnutls can no
longer connect to https://www.openbsd.org. Short output:
$ gnutls-cli openbsd.org
Processed 133 CA certificate(s).
Resolving 'openbsd.org:443'...
Connecting to '129.128.5.194:443'...
*** Fatal error:
On 5/7/20 7:02 PM, Aaron Mason wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:30 AM jeanfrancois wrote:
>>
>> As long as there's no material published it's worth just any other word.
>>
>
> To quote Douglas Adams on whether you can trust people on the
> internet, "of course not, it's just people talking".
>
gif(4) should work fine, as it's designed to do what you described. The
best approach depends on the level of security you want to achieve. IPIP
tunnels aren't encrypted...
regards, kristjan
On 5/8/20 3:32 PM, Martin wrote:
> I have IPv6 unidirectional tunnel between two machines. One of them is
20 matches
Mail list logo
