On 08.04.19 06:25, David Gwynne wrote:
> OK. I made a start on this. Have a look for "sfp module info and diagnostics"
> on tech@, or click on https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=155469738013008&w=2
>
> We don't have an em(4) here with optics, but a diff doesn't look too bad if
> you're willing
On 06.04., LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Hi Bruno!
>
> Bruno Flückiger @ 2019-04-02T06:58:15 +0200:
> > On 01.04., LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > Hey Bruno!
> > >
> >
> > Hi Dani
> >
> > > That's the most curious thing, nothing shows up in the logs when the app
> > > says "Download failed/Could not download ".
Looks to me like you're not running bsd.mp. A dmesg would clear this up.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:19 AM Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:54:35PM +, Ipsen S Ripsbusker wrote:
>
> > My hw.ncpu and hw.ncpuonline are less than my hw.ncpufound.
> > I tried setting hw.smt, but t
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 02:14, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> [...]
> It basically should be able convert the serial port to TCP/IP
> networking. Is this something anyone else has used before -- or if you
> know something similar, I'm really interested!
>
I use a gl.inet GL-AR150 (US$24 on dx.com) running
> totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
Will try to make tests these days + will attach dmesg. Anyway, without a
FS (sequentially writing to a raw device) we'd be testing just the
sequential speed to a raw device, not even to a partition. I think this
would be a practical maximum p
Hi Stuart
Thank you very much for the link.
The total ssh based performace depends strongly on the server hardware
(and installed OSes).
For the "fastest" test configuration (server hardware / installed OS) I
was possible to achieve
a total trasfer speed of approx 400MBytes/s (on the 10Gbit fi
Am 08.04.2019 23:46, schrieb Anatoli:
Thank you very much for the idea Anatoli!
Running dd with "/dev/zero" and "/dev/null" gave me back a very good
overview what is going on (different server hardware and operating systems)
ironm@wheezy:~$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=file1.tmp bs=1M count=4096 &
Hi
> Whats your performance without scp? tcpbench / netcat, for example?
Thank you very much for your hint. I did not run them yet (only iperf3
as listed below)
Further test details are in attached files.
Kind regards
Mark
--
m...@it-infrastrukturen.org
Am 08.04.2019 22:06, schrieb Abel A
Hi Anatoly
Thank you very much for your helpfull hints.
The CPU usage (one of available cores) was nearly 100%.
FreeBSD 13.0 and Linux (Debian) seem currently to have faster network
stacks (and faster mass storage handling).
During test I used debian linux running in live mode (transfer to DDR3
Hi Peter
Thank you very much for your feedback.
It looks like the performance issue is more complex than I have expected.
Just for the test I have installed OpenBSD 6.4 and FreeBSD 13.0 on few
different servers and compared results (details are in attached files).
Pure network speed I have to
Hello Tom
Thank you very much for your hint.
I have disabled pf with "pfctrl -d" command but didn't notice any
difference in the 10GBit transfer speed.
The CPU usage was high (like 100% for one of the available CPU cores)
# Single send
obsdsrv2$ scp 4GByte-random.bin ironm@10.0.0.2:/home/ironm
Thanks Claudio, I was hoping you would see this.
I know that you guys fixed some other MPLS bugs as I was affected by
the LDP/ARP issue as well.
I have one PE running -current that I confirmed was no longer getting
the LDP drops/crashes
but I have not tested this against it as I just discovered it
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> That doesn't answer the question: if you say
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=100
> what transfer rate is reported
>
totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
> That number represents the maximum possible long-term fi
On 2019-04-07, Mark Schneider wrote:
> Short feedback:
>
> Just for the test I have checked the 10GBit network performance
> between two FreeBSD 13.0 servers (both HP DL380g7 machines)
> transfering data in both directions
>
> # ---
> ironm@fbsdsrv2:~ $ scp ironm@200.0.0.10:/home/ironm/t2.iso t100
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 05:08:32PM -0400, Henry Bonath wrote:
> Hello, I am seeing some BGP VPNv4 routes staying populated in
> the RIB of route-reflector clients even after dropping the originating
> neighbor.
>
> I'm on OpenBSD 6.4, running MPLS L3VPN.
>
> I have 2 IBGP route-reflectors, both
Hi everyone,
I am trying to connect to a Vax simulation running under simh on the
same OpenBSD host.
I have set up the networking as follows but cannot ping or telnet to
the virtual Vax. Here are my config files, perhaps some knowledgeable
person could explain what I am doing wrong?
The tap interf
16 matches
Mail list logo
