Hi all.
It seems the errata63.html page is not modified with thoses new
informations about mincore and nfs patches.
normal?!
;)
On 1/26/19 10:51 PM, T.J. Townsend wrote:
> Errata patches for the kernel have been released for OpenBSD 6.3
> and 6.4.
>
> The mincore() system call can be used to
On 26/01/2019 11:03 p.m., ed...@deathstar.my.domain wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 08:53:06PM -0700, Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded from OpenBSD 6.3 to OpenBSD 6.4 today. I upgraded all packages,
switched to php7, etc.
I've been running OpenBSD since 2.7 so this is a very known process.
Hi,
I upgraded from OpenBSD 6.3 to OpenBSD 6.4 today. I upgraded all
packages, switched to php7, etc.
I've been running OpenBSD since 2.7 so this is a very known process.
The upgrade went quite smoothly and is working fine except for my
email. I have massaged the smtpd.conf file to comply
Hello,
I have tried applying syspatch & using current with - same result.
Is there a way to run smt=1 on boot? I suspect that it can be related.
Best Regards,
Hubert
--
Sent from: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-user-misc-f3.html
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 08:13:45AM -0700, hdrozdow wrote:
>
> (again boot dmesg from .sp)
>
Same result with -current?
-ml
> OpenBSD 6.4 (GENERIC) #349: Thu Oct 11 13:25:13 MDT 2018
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
> real mem = 8484638720 (8091MB)
> avail
(again boot dmesg from .sp)
OpenBSD 6.4 (GENERIC) #349: Thu Oct 11 13:25:13 MDT 2018
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 8484638720 (8091MB)
avail mem = 8218324992 (7837MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainb
Hello,
I am fairly new to OpenBSD so excuse my lack of knowledge :)
I have managed to install OpenBSD but bsd.mp kernel just don't want to boot,
.sp works just fine.
dmesg (on .sp):
.mp boot non verbose picture:
https://i.ibb.co/cTvY96B/IMG-20190126-133847.jpg
.mp boot -c verbose on pi
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 09:23:37PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> On 25/1/19 11:29 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:15:47PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> >> First and foremost is the issue of backscatter-prevention. I would like
> >> OpenSMTPD to validate th
Hi Gilles,
On 25/1/19 11:29 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:15:47PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
>> First and foremost is the issue of backscatter-prevention. I would like
>> OpenSMTPD to validate the addresses passed to it before accepting them
>> for relay to my primary M
9 matches
Mail list logo