On June 2, 2018 5:44:01 PM AKDT, Joseph Olatt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My system started crashing and freezing after applying the latest
>patch.
>Only a hard reset by pressing the power button brings the system back.
>The symptoms seem identical to that described in:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m
Hi all,
I've been doing a bit of labbing with some OpenBSD VM's in order to try and
learn how to use OpenBSD's OSPF and BGP tools, as my prior experience in this
sort of thing is running BIRD on Linux in dn42 [1].
In my current lab configuration, I have six OpenBSD VM's which I have divided
into
Hi,
My system started crashing and freezing after applying the latest patch.
Only a hard reset by pressing the power button brings the system back.
The symptoms seem identical to that described in:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=152753921800394
The error I get is:
Kernel: protection fa
So I fixed this configuration simply by removing the /64 from Vio0. I
guess the IPv4 LAN segment can't have any preexisting IPv6 on it.
Thanks.
-Daniel
On 6/2/2018 15:51, Daniel Corbe wrote:
> I'm struggling with a NAT64 config for my network and hoping someone
> could hit me with a clue bat.
>
>
> That's a good question. A similar question I would have is whether it is
> able to relay connections arbitrarily between IPv4 and IPv6.
>
from relayd.conf:
inet6 address-prefix:
If the requested destination is an IPv4 address,
relayd(8) will forward
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 00:57:11 +0300
IL Ka wrote:
> Is it possible to relay to unix domain socket using relayd(8)?
> It seems that relayd(8) only works with protocols on top of IP.
That's a good question. A similar question I would have is whether it is
able to relay connections arbitrarily between
Hello,
Is it possible to relay to unix domain socket using relayd(8)?
It seems that relayd(8) only works with protocols on top of IP.
Here is my usecase: I have application server that only able to listen HTTP.
(there are alternatives that work with fastcgi, and I can use them with
httpd(8),
but
I'm struggling with a NAT64 config for my network and hoping someone
could hit me with a clue bat.
This is going to require a bit of explanation because the IPv6 clients
are not directly behind the OpenBSD server. So bear with me on this one.
+-+
| R
I have a 6.3 machine running four Minecraft instances (i.e. Java apps).
I recently changed the rc script for one of them to use additional Java
command-line arguments. I believe I ran into something similar to
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=138268000201733, where pgrep would
no longer mat
hi, what happened to the service at wolfman.devio.us?
it's now been 15 days that i have been unable to log in.
hope all is well.
Hello
Last year (before about 3/27/2017 when "Add support for RFC4754 (ECDSA) and
RFC7427 authentication" diff was committed to current), I had set up and had
been able to connect iOS devices (iphone/ipad) to OpenBSD's iked, and have ikev2
VPN's happen, almost as if by, magic.
Authentication was
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 06:26:16PM +0300, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> Thanks for updating.
>
> I don't understand the necessity of vether(4) interface in fourth
> option, I tested without it and didn't notice any change. But I would
> fail without your warning about DHCP, thank you :)
>
Hm, it failed
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 6:03 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2018-06-01, J Vans <3...@startmail.com> wrote:
> > I am trying to route all of my ipv4 traffic through a particular server
> > using OpenIKED. I have it successfully set up so that each client can
> > connect, and the traffic passe
Thanks for updating.
I don't understand the necessity of vether(4) interface in fourth
option, I tested without it and didn't notice any change. But I would
fail without your warning about DHCP, thank you :)
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 6:03 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2018-06-01, J Vans <3...@startmail.com> wrote:
>> I am trying to route all of my ipv4 traffic through a particular server
>> using OpenIKED. I have it successfully set up so that each client can
>> connect, and the traffic passes
On 2018-06-01, J Vans <3...@startmail.com> wrote:
> I am trying to route all of my ipv4 traffic through a particular server
> using OpenIKED. I have it successfully set up so that each client can
> connect, and the traffic passes through correctly, but it only works for
> one client at a time. I
Hi All,
It might be worth considering removing the reference to suish.net, as the weekly
and daily lists haven't been updated since November 2017.
https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html#Archives
http://www.squish.net/pipermail/owc/
http://www.squish.net/pipermail/odc/
You might also consider linking
Hi All,
With one of the snapshots from Friday 1 June, I'm seeing more info in my dmesg
than I typically do. Has some extra debugging been turned on?
lock order reversal:
1st 0xff00bb0eecd8 vmmaplk (&map->lock) @ /usr/src/sys/uvm/uvm_fault.c:1441
2nd 0x80081138 drmdevlk (&dev->struc
18 matches
Mail list logo
