The process of writing this out thoroughly - and making sure I'd
searched the misc@ archives properly - got me a solution. Sending in the
hope that it may help someone else.
In short, the ISP requires that pppd sets the remote IP address with
':' in peer config.
hth,
tom
I'm trying t
On Fri, 25 May 2018 08:36:44 +0200
Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> I got a reply on twitter from Roman Zolltarif who wrote a blog post
> about it :)
> https://www.romanzolotarev.com/pass.html#Completions%20in%20Korn%20shell
This seems to be a custom pass implementation.
Anyway, you can get autocomple
On May 27, 2018 2:21:13 PM AKDT, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>certbot used to just be called "letsencrypt" and was some kind of joint
>EFF/letsencrypt development, hence the close relationship.
That's fine. If certbot may be used with other CAs, and if letsencrypt is
willing
to issue certs on reques
On 2018-05-27, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:14:35AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
>> On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't
>> > fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also unlikely to be able to).
On 2018-05-26, justina colmena wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 09:14:35 -0700
> Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't
>> > fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also unlikely to be able to).
would the renice command be of any use ... to change the priority of
the process ?
On 27 May 2018 at 22:09, BergenBergen BergenBergen
wrote:
> I'd much rather prefer a generic tool that could limit any process, rather
> than trying to come up with ways to strip down ones browser.
>
> FreeBSD ha
On 05/27/2018 10:02 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Umatrix is a good javascript control extension. Some websites are even running
bitcoin mining without asking your permission. Theft of electricity in my book.
Once I encountered a mining site. The mining itself got annoying pretty
fast. The browser
I'd much rather prefer a generic tool that could limit any process, rather
than trying to come up with ways to strip down ones browser.
FreeBSD has a cpulimit (https://github.com/opsengine/cpulimit/) port, and
it would be nice if OpenBSD could too. I'm not skilled enough to make one,
but I'd glad
On 20:02 Sun 27 May, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Umatrix is a good javascript control extension. Some websites are even
> running bitcoin mining without asking your permission. Theft of
> electricity in my book.
Hell, javascript itself is a theft of electricity.
Umatrix is a good javascript control extension. Some websites are even running
bitcoin mining without asking your permission. Theft of electricity in my book.
ksh(1) has ulimit comand to limit process in certain way. just search for
ulimit on the ksh man-page.
On 27 May 2018 at 18:28, Luke A. Call wrote:
> I had that problem but turning off javascript (as someone else said),
> turning off images most of the time, and bookmarking the tab group then
> c
I had that problem but turning off javascript (as someone else said), turning
off images most of the time, and bookmarking the tab group then closing as many
tabs as I wasn't actually going to use soonest (especially any viewing PDF
files), dropped it down to ~4%.
On 05-27 12:07:16+0200, Maximi
Have a look at
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/Port-request-cpulimit-td267083.html
and please let me know how it went!
All the best,
Murk
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Maximilian Pichler <
maxim.pich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process
On May 27, 2018 2:10 AM, viq wrote:
>
> On 18-05-26 20:30:32, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 May 2018 00:43:02 +0200, viq wrote:
> > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples,
> > > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via
> > > dovec
On May 27, 2018 2:07:16 AM AKDT, Maximilian Pichler
wrote:
>Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process to, say, 20%?
>
>I'd like to slow down the web browser since it is draining my laptop's
>battery. With enough tabs open it's often consuming ~50% of CPU but
>not doing anything pro
Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process to, say, 20%?
I'd like to slow down the web browser since it is draining my laptop's
battery. With enough tabs open it's often consuming ~50% of CPU but
not doing anything productive. Apparently with RLIMIT_CPU in
setrlimit(2) the total CPU
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:14:35AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't
> > fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also unlikely to be able to).
> >
> > Firewall issue?
>
> Oh, FFS.
>
On 18-05-27 09:34:10, Mark Patruck wrote:
> For me it works with %{user.username} as mail.lmtp(8) user.
>
> See "FORMAT SPECIFIERS" in smtpd.conf(5) for details.
Shows how well I read the man page With this it works, thank you!
> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 09:04:56AM +0200, viq wrote:
> > On 1
For me it works with %{user.username} as mail.lmtp(8) user.
See "FORMAT SPECIFIERS" in smtpd.conf(5) for details.
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 09:04:56AM +0200, viq wrote:
> On 18-05-26 19:18:56, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples
On 18-05-27 09:04:56, viq wrote:
> On 18-05-26 19:18:56, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples,
> > > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via
> > > dovecot
> > > lmtp"
> > > (to have sieve working) int
On 18-05-25 14:15:08, Marco van Hulten wrote:
> Hello—
>
> I have a Dell Latitude E7470 with the latest OpenBSD snapshot.
>
> $ uname -a
> OpenBSD ultron.hulten.org 6.3 GENERIC.MP#45 amd64
>
> dmesg is attached.
>
> Applications crash. For instance for Claws Mail:
>
> Segmentati
On 18-05-26 20:30:32, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 00:43:02 +0200, viq wrote:
> > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples,
> > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via dovecot
> > lmtp"
> > (to have sieve working) into the new s
On 18-05-26 19:18:56, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples,
> > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via dovecot
> > lmtp"
> > (to have sieve working) into the new syntax. So far my config was:
> >
> > tab
23 matches
Mail list logo
