Open source RISC-V 64bit w ECC RAM & PCIe this summer

2018-05-17 Thread Joseph Mayer
4-core (5-core?) 1.5Ghz, 8GB DDR4 ECC RAM, two PCIe slots (one one-lane and one two-lane PCIe 2.0?), SATA, gigabit ethernet, microSD, HDMI, UART. https://www.sifive.com/products/hifive-unleashed/ https://www.crowdsupply.com/microsemi/hifive-unleashed-expansion-board 21 more available in lower li

Re: pledge violation in firefox-60 on snapshots

2018-05-17 Thread Renato Aguiar
Hi, Firefox 60 stopped crashing for me after adding mcast to security.sandbox.pledge.main. Regards, -- Renato Aguiar

Syspatch's SHA256 and SHA256.sig no hash for ipsecout patch

2018-05-17 Thread Martijn Rijkeboer
Hi, The SHA256 and SHA256.sig files in /pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/6.3/amd64 don't contain the hash for syspatch63-008_ipsecout.tgz. Is this on purpose or simply a mistake? Kind regards, Martijn Rijkeboer

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Vadim Zhukov
If you REALLY want something like we had, without JS and non-standard features, you can try something like: @media screen and (min-width: 1000px) { html { max-width: 100ex } html { max-width: 80ch } } The @media queries is a long-standing feature and should just work. The "ch" isn't supported by

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Stuart Longland
On 18/05/18 12:09, Ken M wrote: > In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one because > of > bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean how big > is > the entire man page collection? 20kB may not sound like a lot, but consider, say, the `sh` man

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Todd C. Miller
On Fri, 18 May 2018 02:47:29 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > I must say i never particularly liked that line in the CSS file. > It always felt like fiddling with details that it might be better > not to touch, given that display devices running browsers differ > more than terminal emulators. And he

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Ken M
In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one because of bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean how big is the entire man page collection? I was more hesitant to make the suggestion because if there was ever a community that en masse browsed wit

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Ken, Ken M wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:50:53PM -0400: > I will probably have to duck and run > for suggesting javascript as the answer here... Precisely. :) > But for the most part the modern industry standard to make pages > scale well across many devices and screen orientations is to

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Ken M
I will probably have to duck and run for suggesting javascript as the answer here... But for the most part the modern industry standard to make pages scale well across many devices and screen orientations is to use a responsive design library, most notably bootstrap. Ken On Fri, May 18, 2018 at

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Aner, Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400: > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote: >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote: >>> Absolutely not. >>> Mandoc output is not optimized for any device. >>> >>> Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code >>> make you think it

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Jack Burton
On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:32:44 -0400 Aner Perez wrote: > First non-comment line of mandoc.css says: > > html {max-width: 100ex; } > > Removing this line allows the use of the full browser width. I'm > sure that it was put there for a reason (maybe to approximate the > width of a t

Re: no default httpd.conf?

2018-05-17 Thread justina colmena
On Thu, 17 May 2018 11:26:54 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > No need to run multiple copies of php-fpm yourself, it handles multi > uid itself. Various ways to handle chroot as well, you can chroot them > separately, or use a shared chroot and rely on permissions. This > should give you some

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Aner Perez
On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote: "Ingo Schwarze" wrote: Absolutely not. Mandoc output is not optimized for any device. Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code make you think it is optimized or it discriminates against any device? I don't know which element or rule i

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread xcv
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote: > Absolutely not. > Mandoc output is not optimized for any device. > > Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code > make you think it is optimized or it discriminates against > any device? I don't know which element or rule is the problem, however if I delete

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Marc, Marc Espie wrote on Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:28:31AM +0200: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> x...@dr.com wrote on Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:45PM +0200: >>> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and >>> usability on my phone when I

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, x...@dr.com wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:04:12PM +0200: > I think it boils down to the site being optimized > for common PC screen sizes, Absolutely not. Mandoc output is not optimized for any device. Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code make you think it is optimized

Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones

2018-05-17 Thread xcv
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote: > I'm absolutely uninterested in test results. I understand that many times the designer of a web site may have different priorities than I do. Nevertheless, when a site performs poorly I can only: - close the tab and open another site - try to persuade the designer to mod

Re: no default httpd.conf?

2018-05-17 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2018-05-17 14:26 GMT+03:00 Stuart Henderson : > On 2018-05-17, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> 17 мая 2018 г. 5:50:16 GMT+03:00, justina colmena >> пишет: >> >> Regarding su-php, I'd go with per-user php-fpm process, actually, >> that's much safer, and rarely used ones can easily wait in swap (I >> feel

Re: no default httpd.conf?

2018-05-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018-05-17, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > 17 мая 2018 г. 5:50:16 GMT+03:00, justina colmena пишет: > > Regarding su-php, I'd go with per-user php-fpm process, actually, > that's much safer, and rarely used ones can easily wait in swap (I > feel that you're trying to pack as much users as possible). Yo

ping blocked for 12 minutes

2018-05-17 Thread Axel Rau
Hi, a firewall box blocks ICMP packets (from icinga2 hostalive4 check_command) for 12 minutes. This happens nearly every night. mtr shows 100% loss on the last hop. The ICMP echo requests (10/minute) are directed to the firewall box itself. If this is from a rate-limiting feature, how can I adju

Re: no default httpd.conf?

2018-05-17 Thread Vadim Zhukov
17 мая 2018 г. 5:50:16 GMT+03:00, justina colmena пишет: >I just recently installed OpenBSD 6.3, and I was looking for an example >httpd.conf, but I did not find one. The manual page does document >more or less how to create one, but there still appears to be some lack >of ease and safety putting

Re: 6.3-current kernel panic: aml_die aml_parse:4194 on PowerEdge

2018-05-17 Thread Jan Vlach
> Hi, > > could you please try this diff from kettenis@ > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=152650279308779&w=2 > Hi Hrvoje, misc@, I'm sorry, but I don't access to the hardware (Dell PowerEdge R440) anymore. I've returned it to the supplier already as this was leased only for testing. Sorry