Sorry, I meant “A6” of course!
بداية الرسالة المحولة:
> من: Nick Holland
> التاريخ: ٩ نوفمبر، ٢٠١٧، ١١:٣٢:١٢ م جرينتش+١
> إلى: misc@openbsd.org
> الموضوع: رد: Partitioning on MacBook Pro for triple booting
>
>> On 11/09/17 13:42, SFM wrote:
>> ...
>> The target:
>>
>> Triple boot Mac OS X, O
Sorry, typo. Meaned pkg_delete -a
> Thanks for your replay Christoph.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand things, this only
> works if one is following OpenBSD-current. I am running -release.
> This is an in-use production server; I don't feel wise running
> -current.
If you install for example OpenBSD 6.2 you
On 11/09/17 13:42, SFM wrote:
...
> The target:
>
> Triple boot Mac OS X, OpenBSD and DragonFly BSD from the same drive
> (there are quite a few reasons for this, do not call me a masochist,
> at least not in public).
no need, you already described your behavior. ;)
>
> The problem: As I, of co
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:04:39PM -0500, Jeff wrote:
> Is this a rational solution to the problem? I'm somewhat regretting
> going this route as, unlike with pkg_add, building some ports from the
> tree pulls in more dependencies than via pkg_add (I am assuming that
> these are build dependencies
On Thu, November 9, 2017 4:54 pm, Jeff wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 22:06:43 +0100
> "Christoph R. Murauer" wrote:
>
>> If I understood your question correct ...
>>
>> > Running: OpenBSD6.2-release
>> >
>> > Goal: To run a secure and functional web server.
>> > (the server is currently up and runni
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 22:06:43 +0100
"Christoph R. Murauer" wrote:
> If I understood your question correct ...
>
> > Running: OpenBSD6.2-release
> >
> > Goal: To run a secure and functional web server.
> > (the server is currently up and running and used by
> > the public at large)
>
> If there ar
If I understood your question correct ...
> Running: OpenBSD6.2-release
>
> Goal: To run a secure and functional web server.
> (the server is currently up and running and used by
> the public at large)
If you apply the patches from the errata page using syspatch(8) (if
you are on i386 / amd64) th
Jeff writes:
> I do not imply that openbsd.org recommends waiting for the next release
> and not patching software.
I personally use openup from m:tier, they provide updated packages as
errata are released.
https://www.mtier.org/solutions/apps/openup/
Allan
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 14:52 -0500, Jeff wrote:
>
Is it not worth it to update ports in this way; meaning,
> is it better to simply wait for OpenBSD6.3 and stick with
> binary packages?
>
> The openbsd.org site says:
> The ports tree is meant for advan
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:04:39 -0500
Jeff wrote:
> Is it not worth it to update ports in this way; meaning, is it better
> to simply wait for OpenBSD6.3 and stick with binary packages only
> (as recommended on the openbsd.org site)?
It is has been pointed out to me that my meaning here is unclear.
I forgot, the switch must be compatible with jumbo frames. If you have a
managed switch, you need to enable it.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 14:58, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> The test had PF, NFS, and other services up.
> The mtu/JumboPacket on both nics is 9K bit.
> The w
Hi everyone !
Up to now I have failed to do what the header says and I would love to know the
reason, probably I am missing an/some important step(s).
The hardware:
MacBook Pro mid 2012 with EFI, a single 480GB SSD and 16GB RAM.
The preps:
Installed latest MacOS X (I am using the new “Appl
Hi All,
Have working setup with OpenVPN 2.3.1 on 54amd64 as a server side. As a
client side supposedly using hardcoded OpenVPN 2.1.2. I can't affect to
that version, just added ovpn.cnf to it to have it working. All work
fine on OpenBSD54 amd64 for years...
#openvpn --version
OpenVPN 2.3.1 x86_6
location match "^(.*)[.]shtml$" {
block return 301
"https://$SERVER_NAME%1.htm?$QUERY_STRING";
}
I used the above to change and web address ending in .shtml to the same ending
in .htm
The redirect went to the right spot, but each
On 11/9/2017 2:04 PM, Jeff wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> [...]
>
> Also, is there an easy/sane way to remove packages that were only
> required for building once the ports have been updated?
You could use:
$ pkg_info -t
to show packages which are not required by any other packages
(man.openbsd.org/pkg
Hello all,
Is this the sane/correct thing to do? What is the impact?
Running: OpenBSD6.2-release
Goal: To run a secure and functional web server.
(the server is currently up and running and used by
the public at large)
Previously: Only installing needed packages as binaries via pkg_add.
Now:
Hi,
I'm (re)trying out queuing possibilities in 6.2.
I am trying out different possibilities, mixing queue with prio.
I have accidentally put two different lines in my pf.conf:
match proto tcp to any port domain set prio 6 set queue dns
match proto udp to any port domain set queue dns pri
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Ywe Cærlyn
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well I have introduced myself then.
>> >
To make it clear: No name anywhere like the probably pure fantasy name
of this specimen have ever been held by any human, pixie, faery, troll
or any other entity in Norway, nor in any other sc
Torsten,
Thanks for responding to my question.
I know about this specific sysctl on FreeBSD. Used this one on pfSense as well.
The issue is that this one, or functional similar seems not available on
OpenBSD.
MarcoPC
> Op 8 nov. 2017, om 16:44 heeft torsten het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>>
Thanks Daniel,
Great direction on where to look at in the code. Even without programming
experience I will be able to remove the logging part.
No idea yet on how I can make this configurable via sysctl.conf, but that’s for
later.
Marco PC
> Op 9 nov. 2017, om 10:07 heeft Daniel Gracia het
>
The test had PF, NFS, and other services up.
The mtu/JumboPacket on both nics is 9K bit.
The wires are class 5e.
The switch is a 1Gbps cisco.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 08:19, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>> New
On 2017-11-08, Mark Carroll wrote:
> I am looking to expand my spamd.conf's blacklisting and I now see that
> some providers prefer one to rsync their blacklist rather than simply
> fetching it and more others make their lists queryable by DNS only.
Commercial dnsbl operators will be taking value
Hi folks,
opensmtpd problem on openbsd 6.1: smtpd.conf says
xname = "mail.example.de"
pki $xname key "/etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key.pem"
pki $xname certificate "/etc/ssl/public/mail.example.de.pem"
ca $xname certificate "/etc/ssl/public/DigiCertCA.crt"
limit mta inet4
listen on lo0 tls pki $xname
AFAIK there is no way to turn off those messages in the default kernel. You
could try to write a patch if you care: take a look at
src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c, line #625.
Regards!
2017-11-09 9:14 GMT+01:00 OpenBSD :
> Torsten,
>
> Thanks for responding to my question.
> I know about this specifi
Torsten,
Thanks for responding to my question.
I know about this specific sysctl on FreeBSD. Used this one on pfSense as well.
The issue is that this one, or functional similar seems not available on
OpenBSD.
Maybe someone else has run into this before and found a way?
Marco PC
> Op 8 nov. 20
26 matches
Mail list logo
