On 31.5.2017. 23:17, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Are you following my Twitter or what? ;) I just posted a picture
> of that board, arrived on the doorsteps today. I'll be having a
> look.
perfect box for MP firewall :)
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:19:31PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi arm gurus,
>
> does openbsd support solid-run marvell armada family boards?
>
> primary this little cute firewall :)
>
> https://www.solid-run.com/marvell-armada-family/armada-8040-community-board/
>
>
> if there are any int
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Allan Streib wrote:
>> You may be able to get a higher resolution by decreasing the refresh rate:
>>
>> $ gtf 2560 1440 33
>>
>> # 2560x1440 @ 33.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 48.44 kHz; pclk: 162.77 MHz
>> Modeline "2560x1440_33.00" 162.77 2560 2688 2960 3360 1440 144
Sorry for the noise -- I hit send before I was finished formatting my
prior reply.
Maximilian Pichler writes:
> If and when I get my hands on another monitor I'll definitely try it
> out. (Although ultimately it would be nice to get it working with this
> one, as it works fine under Linux. This
Maximilian Pichler writes:
> If and when I get my hands on another monitor I'll definitely try it
> out. (Although ultimately it would be nice to get it working with this
> one, as it works fine under Linux. This is a Dell U2515H.)
Interesting, that's the same model I have.
You may be able
I guess there aren't too many people playing battlestar on OpenBSD these
days.
I noticed this when entering a space battle:
96814 battlestar CALL ioctl(1,TIOCGETA,0x83c2c197c78)
96814 battlestar PLDG ioctl, "tty", errno 1 Operation not permitted
Which seems to be rectified by adding "tty" to
Hi arm gurus,
does openbsd support solid-run marvell armada family boards?
primary this little cute firewall :)
https://www.solid-run.com/marvell-armada-family/armada-8040-community-board/
if there are any interest in this box i'm willing to donate it for
development ..
ems for me.
Having static date based names for the gzipped archived log files
makes for cleaner backups, and much easier recovery of log files
from backups when tracing a problem.
For instance:
authlog.20170531.gz
If there's a name collision with just day, then I'd add time
authlo
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Allan Streib wrote:
> I think you should try another monitor if at all possible. Perhaps your
> monitor just goes into power-save mode with an incompatible signal.
If and when I get my hands on another monitor I'll definitely try it
out. (Although ultimately it wo
Maximilian Pichler writes:
> Just tried another graphics card (VisionTek Radeon HD 6350), with
> identical results: the boot messages are shown, then the signal is
> lost.
>
I think you should try another monitor if at all possible. Perhaps your
monitor just goes into power-save mode with an inc
Just tried another graphics card (VisionTek Radeon HD 6350), with
identical results: the boot messages are shown, then the signal is
lost.
>Did you ever post smtpd.conf? This issue seems odd.
I did, but for some reason my messages are damaged
on the marc. Here it is on the nabble, the third message.
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/smtpd-doesn-t-start-td319036.html
Hi there,
I'm going to build a new mailserver with openSMTP and Dovecot and I was
wondering what is used for additional spamfiltering for this kind of
setup. I looked around and saw that rspamd is somewhat in favor but
since I'm new to the openSMTP thing (had courier befor) I was wondering
wh
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 30 May 2017 12:32:35 +0200 Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2017 May 30 (Tue) at 10:37:37 +0100 (+0100), Craig Skinner wrote:
> :.localdomain (.local interferes with iStuff, avoid it)
> :.internal
> :.private
> :.priv
> :.lan
>
> NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
>
> All of those domains may
Hi all,
We have an oldish (2013) but well-spec'd pair of servers (active-backup) ,
running OpenBSD 6.0 and PF.
The only difference between the server hardware is that the primary has two
physical processors, the secondary has one.
This primary firewall is worked pretty hard (see pfctl -si below)
> >How about not overwriting already existing files?
> >
> >Index: install.sub
> >===
> >RCS file: /var/cvs/src/distrib/miniroot/install.sub,v
> >retrieving revision 1.1011
> >diff -u -p -r1.1011 install.sub
> >--- install.sub 28
On May 31 01:08:01, dera...@openbsd.org wrote:
> 1. it works, be happy.
I am.
> 2. the memory map from the bios is being honoured; the kernel makes
>conservative decisions to honours it, as a result it works. see 1.
memory map conflict 0xbef0/0x10
memory map conflict 0xbf00/0x10
1. it works, be happy.
2. the memory map from the bios is being honoured; the kernel makes
conservative decisions to honours it, as a result it works. see 1.
3. if you want to drill down further and get access to more memory,
you have the source code AND the hardware.
4. if you don't wan
On May 31 08:48:09, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> This is current/amd64 on an old MacBook A1181 (dmesg below).
> Until yesterday it had 2+1 GB of RAM, now it has 2+2 GB.
> However, dmesg still reports around 3GB.
>
> No, it's not the old dmesg; yes, I have checked. In fact,
> spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 2
19 matches
Mail list logo
