Am 07.04.2017 18:38 schrieb Peter N. M. Hansteen:
On 04/07/17 18:00, I love OpenBSD wrote:
I second to more IPv6 related information.
I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me
put a CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and
64-bit mask? I mean so
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:39:16 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-04-06,
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:44:54 + (UTC)
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017-04-05,
> >> wrote:
> >> > I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP
> >> > tables.
> >>
My new wifi adapter finally arrived today (AR9271) so I want to give hostap a
try with its new 802.11n support. Unfortunately, all the examples I’ve
found center around creating a router/AP when all I want to make is an AP - as
in, no DHCP or routing. I just want to bridge my wired network to the
I don;t want to offend you folks, but I'm curious and I will ask: is
this BSDCon so useful? Does it pay the efforts?
If someone has time and knowledge to do a PF tutorial he/she can do it
and post. Do you need the Con?
I'm asking this having in my mind Google Summer of (no)Code thread from misc@.
Dear Peter,
May I suggest the following topic of interest:
PF with VLAN interfaces (with LACP trunk interface behind) and CARP of course.
Regards,
M.
Original Message
Subject: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial
Local Time: April 1, 2017 10:52 AM
UTC Time: April 1, 2
On 2017-04-06, wrote:
> Since pkg.conf(5) is no longer used, how would you set fullwidth,
> loglevel, nochecksum, ntogo?
>
> In particular, I am interested in fullwidth, loglevel, and ntogo.
>
>
ntogo is now on "pkg_add -V".
nochecksum (to stop verifying checksums during pkg_delete) is on by
de
On 2017-04-06, wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:44:54 + (UTC)
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2017-04-05,
>> wrote:
>> > I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP
>> > tables.
>>
>> Nice trick. Anchors are also good for this.
>>
>> But don't forget that active connect
On 2017-04-07, I love OpenBSD wrote:
> I second to more IPv6 related information.
> I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a
> CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I
> mean something similar to 'overload ' option.
"overloa
On 04/07/17 18:00, I love OpenBSD wrote:
> I second to more IPv6 related information.
> I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a
> CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I
> mean something similar to 'overload ' option.
Table
+1 Queue Prioritization and ToS ( set prio / set tos combinations ) by
examples will be great
2017-04-07 13:00 GMT-03:00 I love OpenBSD :
> I second to more IPv6 related information.
> I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put
> a CIDR into the named table based on
I second to more IPv6 related information.
I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a
CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I
mean something similar to 'overload ' option.
On 04/07/17 13:36, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> Since not everyone can attend to this Conference will there be a
> recording of this session?
At previous BSDCans, talks have generally been recorded but not
tutorials. So probably not. Slides likely will be available after the
session has concluded.
On
I have configured an OpenSMPTD server to use port 587 upon which to receive
inbound mail. When the email is delivered I do not see a message-id from
this originating SMTP server, instead I see a message-id header inserted by
the last server in the line, i.e. in this case my office's Exchange server
Since not everyone can attend to this Conference will there be a
recording of this session? I use pf not so much on a daily basis but I
would like to get more insight too ;)
And I admit I'm more the visual guy
regards
Markus
Am 07.04.2017 um 06:25 schrieb li...@wrant.com:
Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:25:58 +0300 li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Thank you ALL for the hard work over the years to complement OpenBSD.
Yes.
15 matches
Mail list logo