This is a good joke...
If you look at the Wikipedia article on the ISC/OpenBSD license (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license#History) as well as the archived
mail from Paul Vixie and Theo de Raadt, it seems quite clear that the text
in the preferred OpenBSD license (
http://cvsweb.openbsd.or
Thanks to the both of you guys. I kind of figured I had to use a newer
snapshot.
Cheers,
Mitch
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:07:54PM -0500, mitchell wodach wrote:
>> Is anyone else having issues with tar or pax complaining about
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:07:54PM -0500, mitchell wodach wrote:
> Is anyone else having issues with tar or pax complaining about invalid
> pledge arguments?
> When i try to decompress a tarball i get this output:
>
> $ tar xvzf Downloads/xmem.tar
> tar: pledge: Invalid argument
It may be related
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Denis wrote:
> This is not a bug report. This is strange behavior only.
OpenBSD has no strange behaviours. It either works or it does not.
mitchell wodach wrote:
> I have not updated my -current box for about a week and a half so I
> don't know if that has something to with this. Should I update with a
> newer snapshot from the mirrors?
Yes.
Is anyone else having issues with tar or pax complaining about invalid
pledge arguments?
When i try to decompress a tarball i get this output:
$ tar xvzf Downloads/xmem.tar
tar: pledge: Invalid argument
So I tried to update the src tree and rebuild, but i ran into another issue
which go solved.
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote on Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:38:10PM +0100:
> Performing a full license audit of their tree is likely to be time
> consuming (just ask the people who did just that on the OpenBSD
> source and ports trees at least once),
Incidentally, i did a partial license audit of the O
This is not a bug report. This is strange behavior only.
On 24.03.2017 15:34, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> I can test all the code modification if necessary.
> Before that see this, please:
> http://www.openbsd.org/report.html
Following up on both the deploy script and my issues running OpenBSD with
virtio drivers.
I still am not able to successfully install OpenBSD with the virtio
drivers, but I was able to convert from fullvirt to paravirt after I had
OpenBSD installed.
I published my deploy script on Github:
https:/
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 08:46:09AM -0700, Ken wrote:
>> I've read things that allude to a lack of support...
>>
>> "Much like support for RAID-5, support for encrypted filesystems is
>> experimental." - Absolute OpenBSD 2nd Edition (2013),
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 08:46:09AM -0700, Ken wrote:
> I've read things that allude to a lack of support...
>
> "Much like support for RAID-5, support for encrypted filesystems is
> experimental." - Absolute OpenBSD 2nd Edition (2013), page 166.
>
> But a better source than this slowly aging tome
I've read things that allude to a lack of support...
"Much like support for RAID-5, support for encrypted filesystems is
experimental." - Absolute OpenBSD 2nd Edition (2013), page 166.
But a better source than this slowly aging tome is the more regularly
updated website:
https://www.openbsd.org/
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:03:45PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> As far as i understand it, using the Apache license gives more
> protection to end users than the current license does, at least if
> patents get involved.
>
> ..
> |> Apparently lawyers are being paid to help them push this th
On 2017-03-22, Jan Betlach wrote:
> thanks a lot for quick responses. Primarily I need to protect the laptop
> against losing/stealing it. Therefore FDE would be ideal, however I've red
> somewhere that FDE is not officially supported on OpenBSD.
Any idea where you read that?
FDE with bioctl/sof
> I can test all the code modification if necessary.
Before that see this, please:
http://www.openbsd.org/report.html
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017, at 16:56, Marko Cupać wrote:
> ...
>
> What exactly I should pass on enc interface so that the above packet
> passes?
>
> Thank you in advance.
Hi,
You probably need to allow ipencap protocol packets. I also need l2tp
packets, but that depends on whether you use it.
--
Fran
16 matches
Mail list logo
