Proxmox is awesome i have trimmed My so i only run A proxmox kernel with kvm
Oliver Marugg skrev: (8 mars 2017 16:29:24 CET)
>I use Proxmox for VMs, it is KVM based with possibility for LXC.
>OpenBSD, BSDs in general works as proxmox vms. I use it mainly for
>education purposes.
>
>On 8 Mar 2017,
Hi,
I have not experienced any problems virtualizing OpenBSD with KVM, Xen,
HyperV, VMware.
I have done various performance tests over the years and found KVM to be the
best performing, most stable platform for our environment.
Those non-scientific tests simulated some of our typical workloads - w
> What do you mean with "does not yet have full support"?
> We have all relevant virtio drivers.
Could you provide more details, dmesg?
I'm glad to hear it should be working. I didn't spend a lot of time trying
to get virtio devices working when I couldn't find my disks. But all the
expected dev
Hi,
ok it's not nice to ask general things I got it :(
So basically I like to know what kind of Hypervisors are used out there
and work for people. With that input I can look more closely into some
of the Options and check out if the fit my needs. I was not fully aware
that there is a Open
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:35:15AM -0800, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> We have PV drivers for all of them in GENERIC.
>
> Reyk
If nothing has changed stay away from virtio-scsi disks.
See https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=142652469207347&w=2
j.
> Am 08.03.2017 um 07:22 schrieb Phil Eaton :
>
> I have OpenBSD (and FreeBSD) running on Linode VMs (on a KVM host) and it
> works well enough. I'm more than hazy on the details, but the issue as far
> as I'm aware is that OpenBSD does not yet have full support for virtio. So
> I need to use full
Le 2017-03-08 16:25, Raimo Niskanen a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:55:08PM +0100, Solène Rapenne wrote:
Le 2017-03-07 17:29, Roderick a écrit :
For data integrity, you may use sysutils/bitrot to check for data
integrity (bit rot).
mtree(8) with -K sha1digest might be enough, and is in th
Hi all,
I'm seeing this on two systems. Yesterday, I tried to update errata
using mtier's "openup" utility which I've used in the past. I only
mention it becase I noticed these problems at the same time; not sure
there is a cause-effect here. A third system was updated without issue.
The problem
Hi,
what exactly is your question?
Nowadays OpenBSD runs by default on:
- OpenBSD vmm
- Xen (HVM modes)
- Hyper-V
- VMware
- KVM
- VirtualBox
- bhyve
- qemu (also aarch64 and others)
- sun4v logical domains
- ...
We have PV drivers for all of them in GENERIC.
Reyk
> Am 08.03.2017 um 07:07 sch
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> just like to get opinions or examples of OpenBSd as guest on a hypervisor.
> I had it running on a VMware Host but since the free version is missing
> quiet a lot features I was wondering where to look at. I also tried Hyper-V
>
I use Proxmox for VMs, it is KVM based with possibility for LXC.
OpenBSD, BSDs in general works as proxmox vms. I use it mainly for
education purposes.
On 8 Mar 2017, at 16:07, Markus Rosjat wrote:
Hi there,
just like to get opinions or examples of OpenBSd as guest on a
hypervisor. I had it
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:55:08PM +0100, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> Le 2017-03-07 17:29, Roderick a écrit :
> For data integrity, you may use sysutils/bitrot to check for data
> integrity (bit rot).
mtree(8) with -K sha1digest might be enough, and is in the base
system.
> With OpenBSD, you won't g
I have OpenBSD (and FreeBSD) running on Linode VMs (on a KVM host) and it
works well enough. I'm more than hazy on the details, but the issue as far
as I'm aware is that OpenBSD does not yet have full support for virtio. So
I need to use full virtualization for it to recognize my disks and network
Hi there,
just like to get opinions or examples of OpenBSd as guest on a
hypervisor. I had it running on a VMware Host but since the free version
is missing quiet a lot features I was wondering where to look at. I also
tried Hyper-V from MS and this looks qiet ok. So if the "virtual" guys
lik
2017-03-08 13:52 GMT+01:00 Roderick :
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> The point is, you can't design ONE box for ten years of life. With
>> modern SSD tech, I suspect you won't see a SATA port on a computer in
>> ten years.
>>
>
> But we can try to speculate. I guess, we will have
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Karel Gardas wrote:
Well, as a ZFS replacement I've added checksumming support into
SR-RAID1. It was really basic and as simple as possible design and
even compatible with plain SR-RAID1, but still was able to detect and
self-heal corrupted block too. So if data correctness i
16 matches
Mail list logo
