On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:34:02AM -0800, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Yes, this is possible. Could you send me some more
> details including config?
I just sent another message with the whole logs that didn't reach misc@,
too heavy :-). Here you go a simplified version:
OpenBSD 6.0-current (GENERIC.M
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:34:24PM -0500, trondd wrote:
> On Tue, February 14, 2017 2:27 pm, trondd wrote:
> > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/httpd/server.c.diff?r1=1.106&r2=1.107&f=h
> >
> > Unfortunately the commit message is not helpful here.
> >
>
> Ah hah. I knew it'd
> Am 14.02.2017 um 11:27 schrieb trondd :
>
>> On Tue, February 14, 2017 1:48 pm, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
>> Starting from Feb 11 my httpd logs are filled with 408 messages:
>>
>> roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET /
>> HTTP/1.1" 200 2535
>> roquesor.com 79.x
> Am 14.02.2017 um 10:48 schrieb Walter Alejandro Iglesias
:
>
> Starting from Feb 11 my httpd logs are filled with 408 messages:
>
> roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET /
HTTP/1.1" 200 2535
> roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET
/en/styles
On Tue, February 14, 2017 2:27 pm, trondd wrote:
> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/httpd/server.c.diff?r1=1.106&r2=1.107&f=h
>
> Unfortunately the commit message is not helpful here.
>
Ah hah. I knew it'd be somewhere:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148647072802851&w=2
I
On Tue, February 14, 2017 1:48 pm, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Starting from Feb 11 my httpd logs are filled with 408 messages:
>
> roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET /
> HTTP/1.1" 200 2535
> roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET
> /
Starting from Feb 11 my httpd logs are filled with 408 messages:
roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.1"
200 2535
roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:15:48:32 +0100] "GET
/en/styles.css HTTP/1.1" 200 282
roquesor.com 79.xxx.150.xx4 - - [14/Feb/2017:
On 14/02/2017 9:00 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:24:17AM -0700, Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have a web based application (Gallery 3) on one web server with a
fairly large number of photos.
I have nfs mounted that folder onto a new APU2 system with OpenBSD 6.0
on it.
1
Ok, this smells like a buggy implementation of OSPF on the dot-com
vendor-side.
Upgrade of firmware on the both Cisco Nexus 3000-series to
NXOS: version 7.0(3)I4(4) fixed my problem with
ospf stuck in EXCHG/EXSTA.
Setup involving Dell switch shows following then ospfd on the obsd side is run
with
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:24:17AM -0700, Steve Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a web based application (Gallery 3) on one web server with a
> fairly large number of photos.
>
> I have nfs mounted that folder onto a new APU2 system with OpenBSD 6.0
> on it.
> 192.168.123.3:/ext_gallery/ga
Hi,
I have a web based application (Gallery 3) on one web server with a
fairly large number of photos.
I have nfs mounted that folder onto a new APU2 system with OpenBSD 6.0
on it.
192.168.123.3:/ext_gallery/gallery3 520142836 89008296 405127400
18%/var/www/htdocs/gallery3
A very simp
hello,
following the mail of the last week, I met another problem with an etherip
tunnel.
192.168.33.1 - router0 --- router1 --- 192.168.33.2
router0 and router1 are on the same lan (10/8) and etherip tunnel is up.
When I ping 192.168.33.2 from 192.168.33.1, arp requests cross the e
> 14 feb. 2017 kl. 11:33 skrev Jeremie Courreges-Anglas :
>
> I have no idea why you're getting this kind of error, but maybe you
> can simplify your setup a bit more. Can you reproduce when using just
> em1 (out of the trunk) instead of trunk1? Just bnx1?
Iâll try to modd this setup.
Any how
Maxim Bourmistrov writes:
> Unfortunately, this diff alone does not solves this problem.
The patch won't change much if you don't also have the kernel-side
change:
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/if.c.diff?r1=1.467&r2=1.468
Anyway, I'm not sure this will help in your ca
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:21:07AM +0100, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got telekom's VDSL yesterday and I have an IPTV settopbox. Yesterday
> I was trying to get it to work with igmpproxy but it didn't work. the
> IPTV box spoke igmp v3 which was ignored by igmpproxy and I suspect
> that'
Hi,
I got telekom's VDSL yesterday and I have an IPTV settopbox. Yesterday
I was trying to get it to work with igmpproxy but it didn't work. the
IPTV box spoke igmp v3 which was ignored by igmpproxy and I suspect
that's what the problem was.
I tried working with mrouted then and it didn't work
Unfortunately, this diff alone does not solves this problem.
Again, only reboot solved it.
Before reboot, ospfd from 6.0-stable patched with this diff:
# ospfctl sh nei
ID Pri StateDeadTime Address Iface Uptime
10.4.255.26 1 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:38 10.4.255.26
17 matches
Mail list logo
