> On Oct 29, 2016, at 2:41 AM, Frank Groeneveld
wrote:
>
>$ ldapadd -D 'cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com' -x -w secret -f in.ldif
>adding new entry "ou=people,dc=example,dc=com"
>ldap_add: No such object (32)
You must create the root dn (dc=example,dc=com) first. For example:
dn: dc=exampl
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:26:09PM +0300, George Pediaditis wrote:
> Hello.
> On the webpage
> http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#CVS
>
> it says
>
> If you are following the 6.0 -stable branch:
>
> $ cd /usr/ports
> $ cvs -q up -rOPENBSD_6_0 -Pd
>
> if you follow the default install 6.0 cvsro
Hello.
On the webpage
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#CVS
it says
If you are following the 6.0 -stable branch:
$ cd /usr/ports
$ cvs -q up -rOPENBSD_6_0 -Pd
if you follow the default install 6.0 cvsroot isn't set up so someone
should use something like that
$ cd /usr/ports
$ cvs -qd anon..
I'm trying to get ldapd working on 6.0-stable. Using the man page and
/etc/examples/ldapd.conf I've created the following configuration file:
schema "/etc/ldap/core.schema"
schema "/etc/ldap/inetorgperson.schema"
schema "/etc/ldap/nis.schema"
listen on lo0 secure
namespace "d
On 10/28/16 08:55, Mik J wrote:
> I have FTP clients behind my Openbsd firewall and they want to access ftp
> sites on the internet
>
> I have read numerous documentations but haven't found the answer yet.
>
> * I start the ftp-proxy like this
> /usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -D7 -v
>
> * I have rules in
mxb wrote:
> Hey,
> seeing following in dmesg:
>
> uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries
>
> Wasn’t it fixed so system dynamically adjusted this or do I stil need to
> increase and re-compile kernel ?
uvm amaps got restructured that way for 6.0. What you are seeing is in
a different part o
SOUL_OF_ROOT 55 writes:
> It has come to my attention that NetBSD is not related to Kolibri somehow.
>
> Reference: http://board.kolibrios.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=66746#p66745
>
>
>
> Code of OpenBSD can be included in KolibriOS?
Without checking what KolibriOS actually is:
https://www.openb
It has come to my attention that NetBSD is not related to Kolibri somehow.
Reference: http://board.kolibrios.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=66746#p66745
Code of OpenBSD can be included in KolibriOS?
> there is no philosophy.
>
> there was no belief.
>
> maybe there was a touch of idealism, but nothing as refined as you
> suggest.
>
> it was simply a decision made for a handful of things which got reused
> for the rest of them.
>
> back decades ago.
Hi Dan,
Sounds good reasonable decision
Depending on the clients software, but you should be able to use Passive
mode.
man 1 ftp:
-p Enable passive mode operation for use behind connection filtering
firewalls. This option has been deprecated as ftp now tries to use passive
mode by default, falling back to act
Hello
On 10/28/16 08:55, Mik J wrote:
Hello,
I have FTP clients behind my Openbsd firewall and they want to access ftp sites
on the internet
I have read numerous documentations but haven't found the answer yet.
* I start the ftp-proxy like this
/usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -D7 -v
* I have rules in m
> Stuart Henderson already answered that:
> It's easier for the system administrator to have all
> configuration files in one place and on one file system:
> less places to remember for backup and when migrating
> configuration to a new machine.
Thanks.
> Nothing particular, except that simplicit
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:21:13 -0600 "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > > > Different design, different philosophy, and different goals [1] but the
> > > > same BSD heritage.
> > >
> > > There is no philosophy involved.
> > >
> > > England and the US and Canada are not differences in philosophy.
> > >
>
Hi,
kuniyo...@free.fr wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:44:12AM +0200:
> I wonder if there was a technical reason
Stuart Henderson already answered that:
It's easier for the system administrator to have all
configuration files in one place and on one file system:
less places to remember for backu
Hello.
Thank you for your answers (man hier(7)). Just a clarification. I was
imprecise. Sorry. My question was rather technical: I wonder if there was a
technical reason in particular related to security.
I know: FreeBSD is not OpenBSD. I use these two operating systems. And indeed,
they are diff
> > > Different design, different philosophy, and different goals [1] but the
> > > same BSD heritage.
> >
> > There is no philosophy involved.
> >
> > England and the US and Canada are not differences in philosophy.
> >
> > They are just different. philosophy has little to do with it.
> >
> >
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 23:16:50 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Different design, different philosophy, and different goals [1] but the
> > same BSD heritage.
>
> There is no philosophy involved.
>
> England and the US and Canada are not differences in philosophy.
>
> They are just different.
17 matches
Mail list logo
