Re: Unexpected behavior in su/doas

2016-10-01 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 05:15:31PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 03:54:40PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Use of su, doas, or sudo -- means you EXPLICITLY want the tty to > > remain the same. > > > > De-escalation using these "sudo" or "doas" like tools on a tty is > > so

Looking for DMVPN implementation

2016-10-01 Thread Jens Sauer
Hi OpenBSD community, i'm looking for an OpenSource implementation of DMVPN (Dynamic Multipoint Virtual private network). Currently i just found the draft (from 2013) : https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-detienne-dmvpn-00 Comming from Cisco and would be pleased to see it under OpenBSD. http://ww

Re: Unexpected behavior in su/doas

2016-10-01 Thread Chris Bennett
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 03:54:40PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Use of su, doas, or sudo -- means you EXPLICITLY want the tty to > remain the same. > > De-escalation using these "sudo" or "doas" like tools on a tty is > somewhat unsafe - it has always been unsafe - because tty's have > capabiliti

Re: signify: write to stdout: Broken pipe

2016-10-01 Thread Joe Gidi
And, as is so often the case, I figured out the problem right after sending that email. My old 'sudo' package was apparently not entirely functional after updating the base system. 'doas pkg_add -u' got me an up-to-date 'sudo' which is once again working properly. Sheepish apologies for the noise.

signify: write to stdout: Broken pipe

2016-10-01 Thread Joe Gidi
Hello, I'm seeing this error when trying to 'pkg_add -u' on an amd64 system that's just been updated to the latest available snapshot from ftp5.usa.openbsd.org: sudo pkg_add -u quirks-2.260 signed on 2016-09-30T16:46:52Z Error from http://ftp5.usa.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/

Re: pppoe via switch

2016-10-01 Thread Patrick Dohman
Surge protectors from the hardware store is a nice feature to ;) > On Oct 1, 2016, at 11:36 AM, tech-lists wrote: > > On 01/10/2016 14:58, Eric Huiban wrote: >> And my last sentence is where you'll get "problems" with your ISP ! It >> will append if you're leaking undue ethernet packets to the PP

Re: pppoe via switch

2016-10-01 Thread tech-lists
On 01/10/2016 14:58, Eric Huiban wrote: And my last sentence is where you'll get "problems" with your ISP ! It will append if you're leaking undue ethernet packets to the PPPoE gateway : any broadcast or anything unknown to your dumb switch will be submitted to your ISP's good will. So... don't m

Re: Is using relayd to block unwanted HTTP requests, with only having one server a good idea?

2016-10-01 Thread trondd
On Sat, October 1, 2016 12:00 pm, Chris Bennett wrote: > I like what I see in the FILTER RULES of relayd. > I just want to be able to add new filters as needed when seen in http > error_log. > But I only have one server. And I use SSL for two sites. And multiple > virtual hosts on each IP. > Would

Is using relayd to block unwanted HTTP requests, with only having one server a good idea?

2016-10-01 Thread Chris Bennett
I like what I see in the FILTER RULES of relayd. I just want to be able to add new filters as needed when seen in http error_log. But I only have one server. And I use SSL for two sites. And multiple virtual hosts on each IP. Would I then forward to a new local port such as 127.0.0.1:34567 for the

error: [drm:pid10679:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... render ring idle

2016-10-01 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Hi Everybody, I have got the following errors for a couple of weeks now after a snapshot update. error: [drm:pid10679:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... render ring idle This occurs when I am watching a video with Firefox, Chromium, Minitube (and VLC more rarely) for e

Re: pppoe via switch

2016-10-01 Thread Eric Huiban
tech-lists wrote: > On 30/09/2016 16:49, tech-lists wrote: >> Hello misc@ >> >> If I had this arrangement: >> >> openbsd re0 --- unmanaged gigabit switch --- vdsl modem offering PPPoE >> >> can I expect pppoe0 on the openbsd box to be able to communicate with >> the modem and bring the line up? >

Re: pppoe via switch

2016-10-01 Thread tech-lists
On 30/09/2016 16:49, tech-lists wrote: Hello misc@ If I had this arrangement: openbsd re0 --- unmanaged gigabit switch --- vdsl modem offering PPPoE can I expect pppoe0 on the openbsd box to be able to communicate with the modem and bring the line up? It seems the answer to this is YES. Not

iKVM with noVNC (was: Re: 6.0-stable panic)

2016-10-01 Thread Federico Giannici
On 09/30/16 03:40, Stuart Henderson wrote: (supermicro branded java crap). Other than serial-over-lan, ports/net/noVNC is fairly likely to work for connecting to KVM on this machine. Then it's html5+websockets crap instead, but at least it's a bit less unpleasant than java. That's really inter