I'm trying to replace Postfix with OpenSMTPD and I'm having a battle.
I don't seem to be able to get the clues to match the hardware and the
configure recipes that I need.
The most up to date I can find breaks at the second stanza and I can
guess that the instructions for configuring for PF are f
Hi,
I sent in the following request to be re-added to the "OpenBSD Support and
Consulting" page a little over a week ago. What's the ETA on this sort of
thing these days? Also, please apply s/Dragonfly/DragonFly/g to it. :)
Thanks,
--Kyle
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:41
Whoops.
I didn't look at the mailing list name, and thought I was reading at a
Linux mailing list. Perhaps that's why the OpenBSD form of the command
didn't work on Void Linux :-)
SteveT
Steve Litt
April 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century
http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21
On 04/07/16 16:06, Teno Deuter wrote:
Hi,
installed the chrooted version of pureftpd on a 5.9 AMD64 setting and face
following issues:
1.
TLS with system users works fine but not for the virtual ones! Only plain
ftp!
2.
seems that the service doesn't always refer to the 'pure-ftpd.conf'! To be
Yes. Inquiring minds want to know. When I perform the following command:
aucat -v 127 -f rsnd/0 -h wav -o junk.wav
junk.wav is a WAV file with no sound. Changing the device to default
changes nothing, nor does leaving out the -f parameter entirely, and if
I change it to rsnd/1, snd/0, snd/1, mid
Is this helpful?
http://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-current/man7/sndio.7#DEVICE_NAMES
On 9 April 2016 at 01:01, Henrique N. Lengler
wrote:
> But what device should I specify?
>
> Please give full answers.
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:46:53AM +0200, ropers wrote:
> > You mean with aucat(1)?
> >
> >
Oh, scratch that. I was getting confused myself. I think it's actually just
/dev/audio but I better shut up and don't say it because I'm not on an
OpenBSD box now. Sorry for the noise.
On 9 April 2016 at 02:19, ropers wrote:
> Is this helpful?
> http://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-current/man7/sndio.
On 04/07/16 16:06, Teno Deuter wrote:
Hi,
installed the chrooted version of pureftpd on a 5.9 AMD64 setting and face
following issues:
1.
TLS with system users works fine but not for the virtual ones! Only plain
ftp!
2.
seems that the service doesn't always refer to the 'pure-ftpd.conf'! To be
But what device should I specify?
Please give full answers.
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:46:53AM +0200, ropers wrote:
> You mean with aucat(1)?
>
> On 9 April 2016 at 00:09, Henrique N. Lengler
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way to record the sound playing on my speakers?
> > Like duplica
You mean with aucat(1)?
On 9 April 2016 at 00:09, Henrique N. Lengler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to record the sound playing on my speakers?
> Like duplicating it and saving on my computer everything that goes out to
> the
> speaker.
>
> I would like to to this to record some screencast.
>
Hi,
I was trying to test patches for vmm and uvm by Stefan Kempf. Everything
works great and copies between the host and guest are faster with the
patches but I noticed the following.
Whenever I reboot the VMM host (running OpenBSD 5.9 -current from yesterday
with custom kernel enabled with vmm
Hi,
Is there a way to record the sound playing on my speakers?
Like duplicating it and saving on my computer everything that goes out to the
speaker.
I would like to to this to record some screencast.
Any way of doing this?
Thanks;
--
Regards
Henrique N. Lengler
On 08/04/16 19:35, Joe Crivello wrote:
Intel X520 cards seem to work nicely in our shop.
x520 work fine for us too.
G
Thank you for that tip.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
>> On 2016 Apr 07 (Thu) at 22:56:42 +0200 (+0200), Teno Deuter wrote:
>> :Hi,
>> :
>> :just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding pac
I see what you're saying, but this is a router not a server. It's my job to
stop the routing loop. That shorter prefix might actually work. This isn't
how it works on other routers I've used.
Why remove the UP flag from the route then? Older versions of OpenBSD would
still announce the connected r
On 2016/04/08 10:05, Doran Mori wrote:
> Could you give an example of how that it could cause a routing loop?
Say you have a directly connected /27 on an interface, and a covering
/22, or a default route or something.
If the interface holding that /27 goes down (for example the switch
fails, or s
Kevin Chadwick writes:
> I know rebound is not meant for this and see it's benefits for clients
> and even maybe in front of unbound.
>
> However after noticing rebound and the undeadly thread I played with PF
> to see if I could enforce all DNS requests to have come from rebound.
>
> The best I
On 8.4.2016. 16:22, Steiner Peter wrote:
> hello,
>
> i'm looking for recommendations for 10GBase SFP+ network adapters,
> anyone has experience with 10G Ethernet on OpenBSD?
>
> i found dual SFP+ PCIe devices with the following drivers:
> ix - Intel 82598/82599/X540 PCI Express 10Gb Ethernet dev
Intel X520 cards seem to work nicely in our shop.
hello,
i'm looking for recommendations for 10GBase SFP+ network adapters,
anyone has experience with 10G Ethernet on OpenBSD?
i found dual SFP+ PCIe devices with the following drivers:
ix - Intel 82598/82599/X540 PCI Express 10Gb Ethernet device
ixgb - Intel PRO/10GbE 10Gb Ethernet device
myx - M
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2016 Apr 07 (Thu) at 22:56:42 +0200 (+0200), Teno Deuter wrote:
> :Hi,
> :
> :just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
> :regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
>
> > Obvious question, but: did you go 5.6 -> 5.8 or 5.6 -> 5.7 -> 5.8?
>
> 5.6 -> 5.8 but followed the upgrade guides for both and ran sysmerge
> once?
>
> for the emailed bug report for the separate issue I said upgraded but
> it was a new install.
So either this is fixed in 5.9 \O/ or I didn
I know rebound is not meant for this and see it's benefits for clients
and even maybe in front of unbound.
However after noticing rebound and the undeadly thread I played with PF
to see if I could enforce all DNS requests to have come from rebound.
The best I have managed so far without syntax er
On 2016 Apr 08 (Fri) at 08:53:45 + (+), Stuart Henderson wrote:
:On 2016-04-07, Doran Mori wrote:
:> Running 5.9.
:>
:> I have x.x.141.0/25 that's directly connected. With x.x.141.0/24 reachable
:> via bgp.
:>
:> # route -n get x.x.141.13
:>route to: x.x.141.13
:> destination: x.x.141.
On 2016-04-07, Doran Mori wrote:
> Running 5.9.
>
> I have x.x.141.0/25 that's directly connected. With x.x.141.0/24 reachable
> via bgp.
>
> # route -n get x.x.141.13
>route to: x.x.141.13
> destination: x.x.141.0
>mask: 255.255.255.128
> interface: em3
> if address: x.x.141.112
>
On 2016-04-07, silent_wande...@openmailbox.org
wrote:
> I have a Thinkpad X200 laptop with libreboot 20150518 (latest stable
> release).
>
> Libreboot is basically coreboot + grub2 without bios services and with
> no text console.
and without CPU microcode updates that may fix important, maybe
On 2016-04-03, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> I was trying to use NAT66, from some internal subnets to my IPv6
> internet address, using the following line with 5.9 release.
>
> match out on $intout inet6 from !(egress:network) to any nat-to ($intout:0)
>
> The last part expands to the link local addres
On 2016 Apr 07 (Thu) at 22:56:42 +0200 (+0200), Teno Deuter wrote:
:Hi,
:
:just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
:regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
:seems that the user environment isn't able to contact the source.
:
:As l
28 matches
Mail list logo
