On 2016-02-19, Chris Bennett wrote:
> Why don't hru...@gmail.com and li...@wrant.com have a lovely and
> exciting chat off of my lpd/lpr thread?
Funnily enough I didn't see either of those until they were quoted here ;)
I recommend slrn pointed at gmane's news server for reading misc with libera
Hi,
James Shupe wrote on Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:06:49PM -0600:
> 0
> C USA
> P Texas
> T Pflugerville
> Z 78691
> O HermeTek Network Solutions
> I James Shupe
> A P.O. Box 2264
> M sa...@hermetek.com
> U https://www.hermetek.com/bsd-linux-support
> B 512.792.2525
> X 512.888.9889
> N We provide
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:52:43PM +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote:
Maybe you should pull your head out of the sand (asshole) and understand
[...]
That previous request was not to include trolling me privately.
By the way, I only expressed my oppinion
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:45:28 -0700, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:17:55 -0500, Philippe Meunier wrote:
>
> > By the way, while playing with which(1) and doas(1) and $PATH, I
> > managed to get which(1) to core dump, twice, although I have not been
> > able to reproduce it relia
On 17 Feb 2016, at 14:07, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:51:28PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
>>
>> The only thing wrong with lpd is nobody tedu'ed it yet.
>>
>> No really, it is outdated beyond rescue. If you want to write a new
>> print job queueing system, sure, have fun. Maybe
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:17:55 -0500, Philippe Meunier wrote:
> By the way, while playing with which(1) and doas(1) and $PATH, I
> managed to get which(1) to core dump, twice, although I have not been
> able to reproduce it reliably.
The crash in which was fixed recently.
- todd
I have very high expectations that this email thread will produce fresh new
additions to
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/usr.bin/mg/theo.c
very soon.
-luis
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On February 19, 2016 3:42:08 PM GMT+01:00, Jorge Luis <
>
On February 19, 2016 3:42:08 PM GMT+01:00, Jorge Luis
wrote:
>Is true that in LibertyBSD, you can get all of the benefits of OpenBSD,
>while being sure that there are no non-free blobs lurking in the depths
>of
>your system?
No. The firmware is either already on the hardware itself already or g
0
C USA
P Texas
T Pflugerville
Z 78691
O HermeTek Network Solutions
I James Shupe
A P.O. Box 2264
M sa...@hermetek.com
U https://www.hermetek.com/bsd-linux-support
B 512.792.2525
X 512.888.9889
N We provide open infrastructure design, development, deployment,
maintenance and training. We specialize
Theo, I'd like to make a comment:
I do not want to program and use computers to just a hobby to harm me, if
all the software and hardware that exist include non-free code and if is
true that non-free code can contain malicious code, I decide not to program
and use computers to just a hobby.
Is tr
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:52:43PM +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote:
>
> Maybe you should pull your head out of the sand (asshole) and understand
> why you can not find relevant information. You're not reading man
> pages, but people say.
That previous request was not to include trolling me privatel
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, li...@wrant.com wrote:
Well, let me say my opinion.
Why ?!
I think, you missed the context of my two postings of yesterday.
I do not see any problem with lpr/lpd, the only reason given here to
change it is:
* lpd(8)/lpc(8)/lpr(1) is very old and suffering from bitro
I smell astroturfing troll machine.
On 2016-02-19 16:46, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 19-02-2016 12:42, Jorge Luis escreveu:
"What is LibertyBSD?
OpenBSD is universally known as an operating system designed with
security
in mind, proudly being able to say that it has had "Only two remote
hol
Em 19-02-2016 12:42, Jorge Luis escreveu:
> "What is LibertyBSD?
> OpenBSD is universally known as an operating system designed with security
> in mind, proudly being able to say that it has had "Only two remote holes in
> the default install, in a heck of a long time!"
Will you please, please, go
Recurring troll coming from gmail and nabble (you-name-it tomorrow).
Zero entry effort. Wasted electricity and skin. Plain simply ignored.
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:38:38 + (GMT) Roderick
> Well, let me say my opinion.
Why !?
> I think BSD and Unix is also "outdated beyond rescue", but we are
^^
This means "following standards and reliably implementing Unix core".
Same strong words
Jorge Luis [jorgeluiscorreioeletron...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Is true that in LibertyBSD, you can get all of the benefits of OpenBSD,
> while being sure that there are no non-free blobs lurking in the depths of
> your system?
>
Yes, in fact the OpenBSD developers are so enthusiastic about this id
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:47:42PM +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:38:38 + (GMT) Roderick
> > Well, let me say my opinion.
>
> Why !?
>
> > I think BSD and Unix is also "outdated beyond rescue", but we are
> ^^
> This me
http://libertybsd.net/ wrote:
"What is LibertyBSD?
OpenBSD is universally known as an operating system designed with security
in mind, proudly being able to say that it has had "Only two remote holes in
the default install, in a heck of a long time!"
However, OpenBSD ships with several pieces of
I have an ipsec setup using certificate/ca based authentication. The
config looks like this:
# $OpenBSD: ipsec.conf,v 1.5 2006/09/14 15:10:43 hshoexer Exp $
#
my_fqdn="dynamic-0.example.com"
my_v4_ip="192.168.1.1"
my_v4_net="10.0.0.0/23"
remote_fqdn="dynamic-1.example.com"
remote_v4_net="1
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:36:04AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-02-18, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> > My box cannot resolve the name "ike-v1.example.com" until
> > after isc_named is started which happens way late in the bootup
>
> That seems like a misconfiguration - ap
On 2016-02-18, gwes wrote:
> CUPS installs AVAHI. That is a security risk - it attempts
> to change DNS lookups, etc.
Can you expand on "it attempts to change DNS lookups"? Perhaps on OS with
nsswitch via nss-mdns, but I don't see any way of getting it to do this on
OpenBSD, even if you wanted to
On 2016-02-18, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> My box cannot resolve the name "ike-v1.example.com" until
> after isc_named is started which happens way late in the bootup
That seems like a misconfiguration - apart from this issue, what if BIND
crashes or you need to update it? can't yo
On 2016-02-18, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:15:50PM +, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On 2016-02-18 17.11.03 +0100, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
>> > I appear to need to modify the default application used
>> > by xdg-open to open a file directory. The man page of xdg-open
>> > is not very helpful
> Can you please elaborate on why LC_CTYPE
> is the one of the LC_* family to be set?
> Or does the current locale support involve
> anything else then CTYPE?
Aha: find /usr/share/locale
On Feb 19 08:53:15, s...@stsp.name wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Probably not, because if I remove all my .x* files
> > and keep just the .Xdefaults -> .Xresources which
> > specifies the UTF8 locale for xterm, the same thing
> > happens in (the default) fv
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:01:19PM +0700, Tinker wrote:
> On 2016-02-17 01:01, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> ..
> >Why do you think you need to build such a device? Why don't you buy it?
> >
> >(Dell PowerEdge VRTX, HP hyper converged, etc)
>
> Colocation requires rack servers, but thanks for thinkin
On 18/02/16 15:52, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 18/02/16 13:22, Peter Hessler wrote:
How many bpf devices do you have? You may need to create more.
I have 20 bpf devices, 27 vlan interfaces, 27 carp interfaces, 17
dhcrelay processes.
wasn't there a message when bpf devides were short?
On 2016-02-17 01:01, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
..
Why do you think you need to build such a device? Why don't you buy
it?
(Dell PowerEdge VRTX, HP hyper converged, etc)
Colocation requires rack servers, but thanks for thinking about it.
Some important things:
- what is the purpose of this
29 matches
Mail list logo
