Hi,
I was just testing upgrades prior to the 5.6 release and noticed items
in the rc.conf.local were being ignored. A bit of digging, I noticed,
rc.subr had some changes and more importantly there were quite a few
changes to rc.conf.
Cutting to the chase, replacing rc.conf from the upgraded 5.5
Ok I got it working. Here is what I did
Enabled multipath routing (sysctl)
Added the relayd anchor to pf.conf
Created a relayd.conf with this in it
gw1="fxp0"
gw2="fxp1"
table { $gw1 ip ttl 1, $gw2 ip ttl 1 }
router "uplinks" {
route 0.0.0.0/0
forward to check icmp
}
Started
I just watched Reyk's youtube. I'm going with relayd. I can see the 'routers'
section in the man page for relayd to do what I want.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtMxGslqGbM
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Justin Mayes
Sent
Greetings all -
I have 2 internet connections. One of them is static IP, one is dynamic. I
want to use both of them on my gateway. From the man pages and other docs I
see the use of route-to in the pf.conf including the 'next-hop' that it
requires. This is easy enough. Problem is that the next hop
What is the failing result? Does the email bounce? Error in the log?
Does your smtp server require authentication and you need to provide a
password with the secrets.db?
Hello
Current Sep 25 i386:
I want to use shawmail.vc.shawcable.net as smarthost, and i tried
smtp:// tls+auth:// and the others with failing results. What could be
wrong? Thanks.
--
# $OpenBSD: smtpd.conf,v 1.7 2014/03/12
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Jind??ich Ka wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Trying to install amd64 snapshot on MacBookPro 11,1. Boot process stops on
> message: scsibus1at softraid0: 256 targets. After minute or more the install
> program appear. But keyboard do not work. I tried to use
Anyone have any sugestions as to how to make this work?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:32:53PM -0400, stan wrote:
> Sorry that I did not make this clear.
>
> Here s what I am tryin to do, I have a DB server behind a OpenbSD firewall
> that we control. I have a non routable nework behind it that conne
Hello list,
Trying to install amd64 snapshot on MacBookPro 11,1. Boot process stops on
message: scsibus1at softraid0: 256 targets. After minute or more the install
program appear. But keyboard do not work. I tried to use another USB keyboard,
but its same. In pckbc(4) is written, that device fl
Hi Andy,
This morning I have added Priority Queueing (PRIQ) to the ruleset and
prefer TCP ACK packets over everything else. I can see the queues with
systat queue but the change has no effect on the user experience nor the
throughput.
I have read something about adjust TCP send and receive w
On 08-10-2014 17:14, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
> wrote:
>> On 08-10-2014 15:03, ÐÑÑÑÑ ÐÑÑомин wrote:
>>> How affiliate mtier with OpenBSD? Is it safe method/source for update?
>>> Who they are?
>> It has been pointed to me that one of the
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> On 08-10-2014 15:03, Артур Истомин wrote:
>> How affiliate mtier with OpenBSD? Is it safe method/source for update?
>> Who they are?
> It has been pointed to me that one of the ports maintainer/developer, is
> associated with them.
not
On 08-10-2014 15:03, ÐÑÑÑÑ ÐÑÑомин wrote:
> How affiliate mtier with OpenBSD? Is it safe method/source for update?
> Who they are?
It has been pointed to me that one of the ports maintainer/developer, is
associated with them. I've been using since 5.4, and had no issues so
far. Their pa
* Harald Dunkel [2014-10-07 13:46]:
> A related question: I wonder how well "(self)" and "(group)"
> perform, compared to tables listing IP addresses? Is (self)
> evaluated every time for each rule using it, once per connection,
> in certain intervals, or only if one of the network interfaces
> ar
* Stuart Henderson [2014-10-05 22:49]:
> Normal PF logging isn't particularly well-suited to CGNAT-type requirements,
> in order to record both the internal address and the nat mapping you need
> to log both the inbound and outbound packets and piece it together from the
> two separate log entries
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:39:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-10-08, Jason Adams wrote:
> > On 09/29/2014 05:00 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> >> You tested bash. All 3 shells are behaving correctly by passing the env
> >> variable to the bash command you are running. the bash command
>Synopsis:OpenBSD don't recoginize Android Phone (Alcatel OneTouch
993D with Android 4.0.4) as USB Modem
>Category:Kernel, URNDIS (probably)
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.6
Details : OpenBSD 5.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #403: Tue Oct 7
18:24:37 MDT 2014
dera...@amd64.op
On 2014-10-08, Jason Adams wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 05:00 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
>> You tested bash. All 3 shells are behaving correctly by passing the env
>> variable to the bash command you are running. the bash command you are
>> running is behaving incorrectly by parsing the variable as a fu
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Gregor Best wrote:
> From: Gregor Best
> To: Jason Adams
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:57:53
> Subject: Re: ksh, csh same vulnerability as bash
>
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:05:57PM -0700, Jason Adams wrote:
> > [...]
> > So the question is, for those of
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:05:57PM -0700, Jason Adams wrote:
> [...]
> So the question is, for those of us that have added the bash package,
> why is bash still vulnerable after all these weeks, when everyone else has
> fixed
> their bash packages?
>
> Just checked for updated pkg, today, and its
20 matches
Mail list logo
