On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:03:41AM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am running OpenBSD 5.6 amd64/current on a Thinkpad T60 (dmesg at the end).
>
> For a couple of weeks now over the last snapshots xombrero wont start.
> In a xterm I seen the following:
>
> ~ $ xombrero
> xombrero:/u
Are you rebuilding xombrero from the ports tree or reinstalling an existing
built package?
Is your ports tree from the same snapshot as your installed system?
Tim.
On 01-10-2014 14:14, Jeff wrote:
> It sounds like "ping -I" is what I was looking for, but when I use it, it
seems
> to be sending out the packet with the right source address, but sending it
to
> the wrong interface.are there any tricks here?
You must enforce through pf route-to the packets to
Hi there,
I am running OpenBSD 5.6 amd64/current on a Thinkpad T60 (dmesg at the end).
For a couple of weeks now over the last snapshots xombrero wont start.
In a xterm I seen the following:
~ $ xombrero
xombrero:/usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.16.0: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.57.0 :
WARNING: symbol(_ZN
Hello All,
I was trying to use openIKED to setup up multiple IKEv2 tunnels
simultaneously.
Can OPenIKEd software handle simultaneous IKEv2 connections to different
end point or Gateways.
i.,e UE1 connecting to Gateway1, UE1 connecting to GW2.
Can both requests be processed by the software simu
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Gerald Chudyk wrote:
> I have been casually working on this for some time now.
Hey, nice work!
--
"Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV"
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
It sounds like "ping -I" is what I was looking for, but when I use it, it seems
to be sending out the packet with the right source address, but sending it to
the wrong interface.are there any tricks here?
Here's some data (edited) to show what I'm seeing:
fxp0: inet 10.16.100.1 netmask 0x
I found this article its amazing ...
http://mysteriesexplored.wordpress.com/2011/08/24/amazing-encryption-technology-in-ancient-india-the-katapayadi-shankya/
:)
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Jeff wrote:
> I have a very unreliable ISP (approximately 97% uptime). Many of the times
> that they go
> down, I'm connected and can ping within their limited network, but can't get
> to the
> "outside world". In these cases, I have an alternate slow speed conn
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 15:33, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2014-10-01 3:02 GMT+02:00 Giancarlo Razzolini :
>> OpenBSD do not have any secure way to "get things".
>
> Buy a CD. If you don't trust the shop, have it somehow signed by a dev.
I'll note that at the recent EuroBSDCon, nobody asked Theo to
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:31:20PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:20:23AM -0500, Boris Goldberg wrote:
>
> > Hello Otto,
> >
> > Wednesday, September 24, 2014, 2:36:58 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > OM> Try to come up with a reproducable test case, include all relevant
> > OM>
It sounds like "ping -I" is what I was looking for, but when I use it, it
seems
to be sending out the packet with the right source address, but sending it
to
the wrong interface.are there any tricks here?
Here's some data (edited) to show what I'm seeing:
fxp0: inet 10.16.100.1 netmask 0x
> When you fixed it, so it will be in the next cvs src update ?
With the current network, it takes about 5-30 minutes for it to
show up in the various repo mirrors.
Hello Martin,
My workaround was: cvs -q up -D "2 days ago“
When you fixed it, so it will be in the next cvs src update ?
Thanks
Heiko
> Am 01.10.2014 um 18:40 schrieb Martin Pieuchot :
>
> On 01/10/14(Wed) 15:30, Heiko Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hello together
>>
>> I have an issue on my mailserv
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:32 PM, trondd wrote:
> Note: If your server is listed on here with inaccurate or unknown
> information, please contact b...@openbsd.org
Yeah, damned if you do, damned if you don't.
I saw that and was not 100% sure whether this fell into that category
and did not want to
netbsd pf is way too old, and it looks like their plan is to
not update, but to convince people to use another new filter
written from scratch and used by a handful of people.
Good luck.
> I installed netbsd on raspberry pi and intent to
> use pf as a firewall. Seems that pf version on the
> curr
On 01/10/14(Wed) 15:30, Heiko Zimmermann wrote:
> Hello together
>
> I have an issue on my mailserver; the today's current broke my route to
> 127.0.0.1 / localhost
I am to blame, I broke it in r1.237 of sys/netinet/ip_input.c.
I just committed a fix, the normal behavior should be restored with
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:30:49 +0200
Heiko Zimmermann wrote:
> OpenSMTPd brings:
> stat=Network error on destination MXs
>
> What can I to to fix it ?
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Heiko
>
On Debian Linux, I have lo fail all the time, and so after every reboot,
I do:
ifdown lo
ifup lo
Obviousl
At the bottom of the list:
Note: If your server is listed on here with inaccurate or unknown
information, please contact b...@openbsd.org
There is also a maintainer contact email for each mirror. Coincidentally,
the one for Alberta is b...@ualberta.ca
Funny, if it is the same beck, seems like th
On 2014-10-01 16:10, Jeff wrote:
I have a very unreliable ISP (approximately 97% uptime). Many of the
times that they go
down, I'm connected and can ping within their limited network, but
can't get to the
"outside world". In these cases, I have an alternate slow speed
connection that I use.
Rig
Hi again folks,
This is yet another email relating to my search for a secure way to download
-stable source. When I first started building -stable a couple of weeks ago I
chose the Alberta CVS server because I considered it "Home Base"
(or maybe I should say "Center Ice"? :-))
Now that I have t
I installed netbsd on raspberry pi and intent to
use pf as a firewall. Seems that pf version on the
current (7.99.1) is about 4.2 or 4.3 openbsd ver-
sion. I am aware that I might stay locked out if
I make mistake, since the node is ssh reachable.
At first, I would start pf and stay with an option
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:10:12AM -0400, Jeff wrote:
> I have a very unreliable ISP (approximately 97% uptime). Many of the times
> that they go
> down, I'm connected and can ping within their limited network, but can't get
> to the
> "outside world". In these cases, I have an alternate slow s
ifstated could do it ...
I have a very unreliable ISP (approximately 97% uptime). Many of the times
that they go
down, I'm connected and can ping within their limited network, but can't get to
the
"outside world". In these cases, I have an alternate slow speed connection
that I use.
Right now, I manually change the
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Josh Grosse wrote:
> Guidance for environment variable setting can be found in the top level
> src/Makefile,
> and also in the /usr/share/mk/bsd.README -- and you may find the bsd.own.mk
> Makefile helpful.
Dang, should have thought to look there.
I was looking a
On 2014-10-01 11:07, Alan McKay wrote:
Hi folks,
This seems to be the case but wondering whether there is a way to
override this.
In particular I want to be able to build 5.5 -stable and then 5.5
-release + patches
and keep the two source trees separate.
thanks,
-Alan
Guidance for environme
On 2014-10-01 10:29, Alan McKay wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Josh Grosse
wrote:
They happen whenever a fix is backported but not deemed critical
enough
or in wide enough use for errata. Here's the first two I found in
5.5-stable,
there may be others but I stopped looking, since you
Hi folks,
This seems to be the case but wondering whether there is a way to override this.
In particular I want to be able to build 5.5 -stable and then 5.5
-release + patches
and keep the two source trees separate.
thanks,
-Alan
--
"Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV"
Hello together
I have an issue on my mailserver; the today's current broke my route to
127.0.0.1 / localhost
Externel IP is working.
Here are some Infos:
ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 32768
priority: 0
groups: lo
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen
I’m running a L2TP server using npppd on OpenBSD 5.5. Is it possible to run
both PPTP and L2TP using npppd?
I tried to append a tunnel for pptp in default configuration then my L2TP could
not work.
Best regards
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Josh Grosse wrote:
> They happen whenever a fix is backported but not deemed critical enough
> or in wide enough use for errata. Here's the first two I found in 5.5-stable,
> there may be others but I stopped looking, since you just wanted a couple
> of examples.
Ok, here i go, i downloaded pidgin from original web and sipe from their
web too.
This procedure does not adjust to the procedures folllowed by openbsd but,
its valid to get pidgin / sipe working =)
Pidgin pidgin-2.10.9 from https://pidgin.im/download/
Sipe 1.18.2 from
http://sourceforge.net/proj
Hi,
It seems that manual pages related to X Window (e.g. xterm) do not
appear on http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi causing all links
that point to them on the OpenBSD FAQ to be broken.
Best regards,
Edward
Hi guys,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:16:05PM +0100, OpenBSD Europe wrote:
| > Am 09/30/14 um 14:42 schrieb Martijn van Duren:
| >
| > The openbsdstore.com has opend.
| >
| > Guess what I just did? ;-)
| >
| > Cheers,
| > STEFAN
|
| Yep.
|
| We had a some issues to start with.
|
| *Please*, if yo
2014-10-01 3:02 GMT+02:00 Giancarlo Razzolini :
> OpenBSD do not have any secure way to "get things".
Buy a CD. If you don't trust the shop, have it somehow signed by a dev.
Best
Martin
I'm trying out relayd (as released in 5.4, feel free to suggest I update
if it would help my use case) for transparent outgoing http proxying.
Before I turn to filtering I'd like to look at the traffic, creating a
log of URLs I can sift through daily. I'm having trouble getting it to
log the wa
On Oct 1, 2014 5:51 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading all of my OpenBSD packages (
http://lteo.net/blog/2012/11/08/reinstalling-all-your-openbsd-packages-with-pkg-adds-fuzzy-matching-feature/)
I've started getting frequent core dumps in Node.js.
>
What version of node are you using and what
Hi,
After upgrading all of my OpenBSD packages
(http://lteo.net/blog/2012/11/08/reinstalling-all-your-openbsd-packages-with-pkg-adds-fuzzy-matching-feature/)
I've started getting frequent core dumps in Node.js.
All I'm seeing is `segmentation fault (core dumped)`. I wanted to try
https://github.c
Hi Pieter,
On 09/29/14 10:54, Pieter Verberne wrote:
> On 2014-09-26 18:52, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> It takes 2 or 3 minutes till the connection is established.
> I have seen very similar things on Soekris. Also hostname.pppoe0 seems to be
> picky
> about the syntax. Where you can just [enter]
40 matches
Mail list logo
