Hi Matti,
Matti Karnaattu wrote on Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:14:25AM +0300:
> 1. Is there any preferred way to post diffs?
* cvs diff -Nup
* send inline in the mail body, not as MIME attachments
* if you are already in contact with a particular group of
developers who want to review diffs in
Thanks for the comprehensive answer. I was already looking for coding
conventions. That preferred style is actually fair, and it is important
that everyone is in line and respect that. I also agree that goto is
fair way to model exceptions in C language.
Couple of questions before I start hacking:
|
| However, I can't do that task because I don't know the OpenBSD developers
| mindset and I don't know yet is this the right community. I'm
| interested to put effort in controlled manner and help to remove ambiquity.
|
| I'm still probing this community.
|
Hi Matti,
Best way to see what thi
I'm reading now.
Thank you.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:27:00 -0500 "Francisco Valladolid H."
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> There are a docs or FAQ ?
>
> not that I know of. That's what I do:
>
> queue dsl on pppoe0
Hi,
I believe he intended to reference
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/pf.conf.5?query=pf%2econf&arch=i386
On 9/11/2014 午前 02:27, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
Thank you.
There are a docs or FAQ ?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote
Thank you.
There are a docs or FAQ ?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:01:17 -0500 "Francisco Valladolid H."
> wrote:
>
>> Where can find the docs for the new queue system in OpenBSD ?
>
>
> pf.conf(5) search for QUEUEING
> --
> http://gm
>Note that that diff does the converse of what you requested, pegging a
>thread to a CPU instead of banning the CPU from running other
>processes' threads.
True, but this is good starting point.
>On your bigger question: I don't know of any one working on making
>OpenBSD a realtime OS in the sens
Hi Matti,
i don't know about "safety critical" and have no idea whether
what you are saying / trying to do there makes any sense,
so i'm snipping that. Replying to your other questions...
Matti Karnaattu wrote on Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:29:14PM +0300:
> Is there any centralized static analysis
Where can find the docs for the new queue system in OpenBSD ?
I remeber the ALTQ in the OpenBSD pf faq.
Best Regards.
--
Francisco Valladolid H.
-- http://blog.bsdguy.net - Jesus Christ follower.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Matti Karnaattu wrote:
>>You can use this diff if you want, it adds support for nice(1) to do
>>the binding, I use it to do MP tests.
>
> Thanks! This helps a lot.
Note that that diff does the converse of what you requested, pegging a
thread to a CPU instead of ba
>You can use this diff if you want, it adds support for nice(1) to do
>the binding, I use it to do MP tests.
Thanks! This helps a lot.
>"hobby" and "safety critical" don't often go together. if you just
>want to improve your skills i say go for it but aiming for safety
>critical is a high bar to achieve.
I like to keep bar high.
>But if you're really looking to do safety critical, which industry are
>you going to target?
Medica
On 9 September 2014 22:30, Matti Karnaattu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to dedicate CPU core to process?
>
> What I'm looking for is simple way to take advantage of high quality and
> secure code base of OpenBSD to use in real time/embedded applications.
> If this trick can be achived, it is
On 2014-09-06 23:13:51, Bryan Linton wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> [dmesg and ifconfig output attached inline at bottom]
>
> I upgraded from a mid-July snapshot to a recent one, and I've been
> experiencing a strange problem with the network losing
> connectivity that I haven't been able to pin down.
14 matches
Mail list logo
