On 07/02/14 8:46 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 07/02/14 01:54, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
This is probably the time where most people would recommend against
that since it is essentially a complete reinstall of all items to upgrade
from pre-5.5 to 5.5 due to time_t ABI change.
Chris
Sorry bu
On 07/02/14 01:54, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
This is probably the time where most people would recommend against
that since it is essentially a complete reinstall of all items to upgrade
from pre-5.5 to 5.5 due to time_t ABI change.
Chris
Sorry but isn't the ABI time_t change
http://www.openbsd.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 04:28:21PM -0500, Brian Curran wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:29:37AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > On 06/02/14 9:25 AM, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> > >Brian Curran brianpcurran.com> writes:
> > >
> > >>>when it stops passing traffic, does issuing "ifconfig urtw0 scan" hel
On 2014-02-06, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Kenneth Westerback [kwesterb...@gmail.com] wrote:
>>
>> And, surprise!, boot blocks do change. 5.5 will be an example as things are
>> rearranged and unified.
>>
>
> But you can still use old bootblocks to run the new kernel as a bootstrap
You can, but B
4 matches
Mail list logo