On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:28 PM, wrote:
> Hi there, I have OpenBSD installed in my laptop for a few months now
> and I've been
> trying to find a way to make the Programmer Dvorak keyboard layout
> (from http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/index.html) to work on
> OpenBSD and I've
> failed. I've
Hi there, I have OpenBSD installed in my laptop for a few months now
and I've been
trying to find a way to make the Programmer Dvorak keyboard layout
(from http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/index.html) to work on
OpenBSD and I've
failed. I've searched the web for solutions and so far I did not
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:47 AM, wrote:
> Almost forgot to say about this vttest thing. Um, you do realize that it's
> been written by the author of XTerm?
that does not imply bias. you're coming off as ignorant
> And how it is XTerm-specific?
and these are xterm replacements. they are emulati
Almost forgot to say about this vttest thing. Um, you do realize that it's been
written by
the author of XTerm? And how it is XTerm-specific? St aside, as for urxvt - I
have never
seen an application refusing to run through it. Not even something like
"compatible" mode
run where rxvt simply pret
> when st or a similarly small project passes a test for vim, emacs,
> mutt, other popular ncurses clients, then it's worth thinking about
> replacing xterm
Here we go. A bunch of screenshots depicting st runinng multimple curses
applications including
(but not limited) vim, htop, alsamixer, utf8
Thu 1.Aug'13 at 6:57:47 -0400, Sam Fourman Jr.
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:34 AM, wrote:
>
> for example, FreeBSD uses clang now, they are making real progress on
> having the ports tree build with clang as well
> NetBSD supports a LOT of architectures,as does Ope
I've always taken for granted the compiler I used -- until I read this
thread. I've used buggy compilers before, such as fxc. I was even
greatly affected by a bug in gcc and Apple. Although it caused me to
contentedly switch to Microsoft, I still did not acknowledge my
compiler's performance
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:34 AM, wrote:
> > Well, I think you get the point
>
> Certainly I do, but this leaves everything but gcc overboard as pcc
> project is too small to
> scale so widely on all the architectures OpenBSD supports. The same
> applies to Clang - it's
> been thought mainly as a c
> Well, I think you get the point
Certainly I do, but this leaves everything but gcc overboard as pcc project is
too small to
scale so widely on all the architectures OpenBSD supports. The same applies to
Clang - it's
been thought mainly as a commercial replacement for gcc for titanics like
App
On 08/01/2013 01:09 AM, h...@riseup.net wrote:
Finally. Someone who's really smart Explained Everything in a solid bug-free
english text
(shame on me).
For such a brilliant manuscrpit I'd only like to add a simple sub-question:
Are you guys consider Portable C Compiler unsuitable/dead for thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
