> I have installed OpenBSD onto my Lemote netbook, and have apmd running on
> startup. If I run the command 'zzz' the computer suspends perfectly.
> However, on turning the machine back on, it boots as normal, with complains
> about being uncleanly shutdown.
How did you `turn the machine back on'?
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 06:24:46PM +, Peter Fraser wrote:
> [[:>:]]
> Anchors the single character regular expression or subexpression
> immediately following it to the end of a word.
>
> Should say
>
> [[:>:]]
> Anchors the single character regular ex
On 5 June 2013 17:50, Ville Valkonen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just confirming one thing: did you flush the pf states between the
> tests? I must admit, I mainly glanced the problem, so sorry if this is
> an old tip. This was the first thing that popped into my mind when
> reading about your solution.
>
Hi,
just confirming one thing: did you flush the pf states between the
tests? I must admit, I mainly glanced the problem, so sorry if this is
an old tip. This was the first thing that popped into my mind when
reading about your solution.
--
Sincerely,
Ville Valkonen
On 5 June 2013 22:39, Raimund
2013/6/5 Henning Brauer :
> * Nick [2013-03-02 04:09]:
>> Atom = low power consumption for low performance processing.
>
> err, no. the current atoms are blazingly fast really. and
"Current" being Cedarview? Because the network appliances I've seen
till today (e.g. from Lanner or Bytemine) still
On 5/06/2013 0:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:43:21PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 01/06/13 18:44, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Can you give this diff a spin? Not much tested but the current way we
define an area as active (having at least one active neighbor) is wrong.
Thi
I've got the issue solved by disabling states on all rules which deal with
the tproxy.
On 4 June 2013 11:28, Raimundo Santos wrote:
> I am guessing that the problem lies with flags S/SA.
>
> Changing all rules to flags any, and the packets hits the rules, but
> things go worse: no web navigatio
* Jiri B [2013-03-14 16:32]:
> Situation: onboard network card is broken and was used in OS.
> You just plug additional network card, and disable the old
> one via `config' (is this right?). The "policy" in your
> setup is the order of network cards make some logic:
> * 1st backup/installation
> *
On 2013-06-05, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up a pair off redundant carp/pfsync firewalls/routers to
> perform as VLAN gateways.
> The firewalls will announce the VLAN networks to OSPF and also will do
> NAT on traffic destinating to the internet.
>
> I'm using a carp interfa
* Maxim Khitrov [2013-03-13 18:57]:
> I was a bit surprised by the following behavior when configuring pf on
> OpenBSD 5.2. Non-persistent tables that are only referenced by inline
> anchor rules, as in the following example, are removed from memory
> when pf.conf is loaded.
not-so-wild guess - t
[[:>:]]
Anchors the single character regular expression or subexpression
immediately following it to the end of a word.
Should say
[[:>:]]
Anchors the single character regular expression or subexpression
immediately preceding it to the end of
On 2013-06-05, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Nick [2013-03-02 04:09]:
>> Atom = low power consumption for low performance processing.
>
> err, no. the current atoms are blazingly fast really. and
>
>> Crypto
>
> they do for breakfast.
the next ones should be *much* better.
* Henning Brauer [2013-06-05 20:05]:
> * Nick [2013-03-02 04:09]:
> > Atom = low power consumption for low performance processing.
> err, no. the current atoms are blazingly fast really. and
ewps. I didn't mean to send this to the list. without context that
statement isn't true - nick & I know e
* Nick [2013-03-02 04:09]:
> Atom = low power consumption for low performance processing.
err, no. the current atoms are blazingly fast really. and
> Crypto
they do for breakfast.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hos
Hello,
Apologies if this is the wrong group, I could not find a list specific to
MIPS/Loongson devices.
I have installed OpenBSD onto my Lemote netbook, and have apmd running on
startup. If I run the command 'zzz' the computer suspends perfectly.
However, on turning the machine back on, it boots a
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, F Bax wrote:
> I just upgraded from 5.2-release to 5.3-release and notice the following
> issues with touchpad mouse control.
> 1) using left-click then drag to hilight then copy text no longer works;
> happens in term window or gui app (ie: firefox).
> 2) When usi
* Fil DiNoto [2013-02-16 21:54]:
> I prefer rule processing order
kinda funny, that is what I consider the biggest (and unfixable)
mistake in pf.
but that's all history.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting, Mail
> ../../../../arch/i386/i386/locore.s:1755: Error: no such instruction: `stac'
> ../../../../arch/i386/i386/locore.s:1759: Error: no such instruction: `clac'
I'd start from this.
Zoran
Hi,
I'm setting up a pair off redundant carp/pfsync firewalls/routers to
perform as VLAN gateways.
The firewalls will announce the VLAN networks to OSPF and also will do
NAT on traffic destinating to the internet.
I'm using a carp interface to announce the NAT pool to OSPF which works
but I'
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:27PM +1000, John Tate wrote:
> I am having trouble building 5.3, I ran cvs a second time just be to be
> sure everything was right.
> ../../../../arch/i386/i386/locore.s
> ../../../../arch/i386/i386/locore.s: Assembler messages:
> ../../../../arch/i386/i386/locore.s:17
Will/Do openBSD provide an OpenFlow daemon ?
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:27PM +1000, John Tate wrote:
> I am having trouble building 5.3, I ran cvs a second time just be to be
> sure everything was right.
>
> # make clean && make
> rm -f eddep *bsd *bsd.gdb tags *.[dio] [a-z]*.s [Ee]rrs linterrs assym.h
> cat ../../../../arch/i386/i386/ge
On 06/05/13 05:01, John Tate wrote:
I am having trouble building 5.3, I ran cvs a second time just be to be
sure everything was right.
You are referring to -current, right?
Amd64 works fine, I don't know about i386.
OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Wed Jun 5 04:14:56 EDT 2013
r...@elmins
On 05/06/13 10:50, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 05/06/13 01:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Yeah, while the diff fixed the B flag it did not solve the problem
that we skipped our own networks. This version should solve that (at
least it does in my quick test). Needs lots of testing since this
change
I am having trouble building 5.3, I ran cvs a second time just be to be
sure everything was right.
# make clean && make
rm -f eddep *bsd *bsd.gdb tags *.[dio] [a-z]*.s [Ee]rrs linterrs assym.h
cat ../../../../arch/i386/i386/genassym.cf ../../../../arch/i386/i386/
genassym.cf | sh ../../../../ker
On 05/06/13 01:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Yeah, while the diff fixed the B flag it did not solve the problem
that we skipped our own networks. This version should solve that (at
least it does in my quick test). Needs lots of testing since this
changes core parts of the route calculation.
First
26 matches
Mail list logo