Recently obtained WD7500-BPKT (750g) hard drive that apparently
possesses Advanced Format technology.
On Intel D525MW board through ACPI.
On installation of 5.3-release, offered FFS (not FFS2) - ok ;-)
First partition auto-aligned at sector 64.
I did not ensure partitions were at 4k multiples. N
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:26:07PM +0200, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I like the versioning feature in Google Docs a lot. There I can review
> past revisions of a document, which were generated automatically. In
> LibreOffice Writer, such a feature can be improvised if I change the
> user
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 17:27, Brett Mahar wrote:
> It seems like sis occurs twice in section 4 of the manual
> (amd64-current)
>
> $ man -k sis
>
> sis (4) - SiS 900, SiS 7016, and NS DP83815/6 10/100 Ethernet device
> sisfb (4/loongson) - SiS 315 Pro frame buffer
>
> sis (4) - SiS and
Hi misc,
i have wrote some C code to resolve my OSPF+BGP default route problem,
and now the problem is resolved by the following ospfd patch.
I have added the kroute-ignore-insert option to ospfd. This options
block kernel route insertion with a prefix, prefixlen and nexthop option
Example:
krout
On 31.5.2013. 16:50, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We @srce have small IX and we filter bgpd updates with communities.
> Our conifg is simple and works great:
>
> match from any set community 12345:65000
> deny to { group rsip4, group rsip6 } community 12345:65000
> deny to { group rsip4, g
Hello,
We @srce have small IX and we filter bgpd updates with communities.
Our conifg is simple and works great:
match from any set community 12345:65000
deny to { group rsip4, group rsip6 } community 12345:65000
deny to { group rsip4, group rsip6 } community 0:12345
allow to { group rsip4, group
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:51:24PM +0200, Stijn wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's
> something I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to
> point my in the right direction.
>
> Let me first explain the setup; output of the devices follows
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 08:02 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
>> Could be better to use binary packaged version released by OpenBSD
>> (http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.3/packages/amd64/snort-2.9.4.0.tgz)??
>
> Any reason why you didn't start with the
On 05/31/2013 08:02 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> Could be better to use binary packaged version released by OpenBSD
> (http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.3/packages/amd64/snort-2.9.4.0.tgz)??
Any reason why you didn't start with the packged version?
And did you tune snort.conf to your setup?
ch
On 31/05/2013 10:33, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 31/05/13 00:51, Stijn wrote:
Hi misc,
I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's
something I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to point
my in the right direction.
Let me first explain the setup; output of th
On 31/05/13 00:51, Stijn wrote:
Hi misc,
I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's something
I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to point my in the
right direction.
Let me first explain the setup; output of the devices follows at the end.
I have a setup of
It seems like sis occurs twice in section 4 of the manual
(amd64-current)
$ man -k sis
sis (4) - SiS 900, SiS 7016, and NS DP83815/6 10/100 Ethernet device
sisfb (4/loongson) - SiS 315 Pro frame buffer
sis (4) - SiS and XGI video driver
Hi all,
I am trying to run snort IDS (release 2.9.4.6) with only so_rules
under an OpenBSD 5.3 amd64 host, but the numbers are disappointing.
Host is a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, with 8 GiB RAM and
four e1000 interfaces.
Some numbers:
top:
load averages: 0.69, 0.65, 0.53
31 pro
13 matches
Mail list logo
