Cesar Calvo urulab.com> writes:
> All packets from net1 ip are delivery via 190.64.x.x gateway.
> But on openbsd, route syntax is different.
> I have hostname.em0 with:
> inet 200.124.200.125 255.255.255.248 none
> !route add 190.64.x.x -iface em0
Above "route add" syntax seems strange to me. Ma
Hi Riccardo
Your circuit analysis software certainly is scientific software. I
should have been more specific. My field is analytical instrumentation
software. Examples of instruments would be HPLC systems, Gas
Chromatographs, spectrometers etc.
I am still on Linux on my primary desktop. I
Hi Marc
I have looked at xforms, it is helpful to study to understand FLTK too.
Thanks and Thanks to Jay for his post too
On 13-05-25 11:51 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
Hi Richard
Actually I am not looking for a Windows clone, just a
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:39 PM, bofh wrote:
> Have you considered HTML5 + CSS?
>
> Seriously.
>
+
canvas is awesome
all we need is webkit (all the window system is just a dying breed)
>
> On Friday, May 24, 2013, ag@gmail wrote:
>
> > Have you considered a thought that XFCE may be easily cu
Then you might also want to look into .. http://etoileos.com/etoile/
On 25 May 2013 18:29, Marc Espie wrote:
> There are transient windows annotations that fvwm completely disregards.
Can you give me examples of applications which this is lacking in? I
bet they behave fine in FVWM 2.6.5.
> The other thing it doesn't really support is multiple screen support
> an
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 06:05:43PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 25 May 2013 16:53, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> >> > I tried to load Fluxbox and was disappointed with i
On 25 May 2013 16:53, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +, z...@sdf.org wrote:
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
>> > I tried to load Fluxbox and was disappointed with it. It had several
>> > menubuttons for application that were not yet
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> > I tried to load Fluxbox and was disappointed with it. It had several
> > menubuttons for application that were not yet installed.
>
> There is more than just Fluxbo
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
> Actually I am not looking for a Windows clone, just a
> software-correct GUI. I don't need much too. I need text input
> widgets and a way to display graphs. The graphs could be
> grammatically created images that a
Hi,
Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> Hi Ricardo
>
> I am curious which scientific instrumentation application that was? I
> have heard about the odd one that will run on Mac but it's an industry
> 99% dominated by Windoze.
>
it was simulation software for VHDL for implementation on VLSI or FPGAs,
the
Guillaume Filion writes:
> I did some tests with OpenBSD 5.3 running as a Hyper-V 2012 virtual
> machine and the performance is disappointing (see
> http://guillaume.filion.org/blog/archives/2013/05/openbsd_networking_performance_hyperv_2012.php
> for data).
At the risk of sounding like an idiot
Hi people.
I have a linux server a try to migrate to openbsd 5.3/amd64. I am totatly
new in this amazing OS.
In linux I have:
- ip addr 200.124.200.125/32 dev net1
- ip route add 190.64.x.x dev net1
- ip route add default via 190.64.x.x
All packets from net1 ip are delivery via 190.64.x
Hi people.
I have a linux server a try to migrate to openbsd 5.3/amd64. I am totatly
new in this amazing OS.
In linux I have:
- ip addr 200.124.200.125/32 dev net1
- ip route add 190.64.x.x dev net1
- ip route add default via 190.64.x.x
All packets from net1 ip are delivery via 190.64.x
Hi ag, Hello Nicolai, Hi zz, Hello Dmitrij
I hope you don't mind, I thought I would create a combined answer in
hopes of not upsetting people with too many of my posts.
I very much appreciate all your responses.
I don't mind extra work at all and I can try to customize things, my
concern is
Hi people.
I have a linux server a try to migrate to openbsd 5.3/amd64. I am totatly
new in this amazing OS.
In linux I have:
ifconfig net1 200.124.200.125/29
route add -net 190.64.x.x dev net1
route add gateway 190.64.x.x dev net1
All packets from net1 ip are delivery via 190.64.x.x gateway.
Bu
Hi Martijn
Thanks for bringing up an excellent point. I also need to figure out
what widget toolkit to use. I have used WXPython, GTK with about 6 or 7
bindings, QT, TK and FLTK in the past.
Many bindings are nightmares and some like QT are so huge that it's like
assembling pre-fabricated mi
Hi Bofh
Thanks for bringing this up.
I wrote off the idea of using a web based solution a long time ago.
However things have changed a lot since then. I could deploy the
application on a Raspberry PI or Olimex board and people could access it
from Windows machines via their internal network.
Hi Ricardo
I am curious which scientific instrumentation application that was? I
have heard about the odd one that will run on Mac but it's an industry
99% dominated by Windoze.
I tried GNUstep and wrote it off because it was so black it looked like
crap. My approach has changed a lot since
Hi Jan
Thanks for mentioning this, if it ships with Open BSD then it's going to
be correct. It might just be a matter of making it a bit pretty.
On 13-05-25 03:56 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On May 24 18:48:05, spell_gooder_...@spellingbeewinnars.org wrote:
While about 7 out of the 9 years with L
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Patrick Mc(avery
wrote:
> I tried to load Fluxbox and was disappointed with it. It had several
> menubuttons for application that were not yet installed.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Patrick Mc(avery
wrote:
> It was really quite a lot of links to non-install
Hi,
I am happy to see fellow-thinkers. GUIs are moving to a disaster.
Windows 2000 was usable, heck even Windows 7, once its features are
tuned, is a good and usable OS! But have you seen Windows 8? It is pure
crap for desktop use.
GNOME became a monstrum.. and Mac was nice... years ago. The la
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> I tried to load Fluxbox and was disappointed with it. It had several
> menubuttons for application that were not yet installed.
There is more than just Fluxbox out there. That's UNIX world, it
is up to you and you have plenty of
On May 24 18:48:05, spell_gooder_...@spellingbeewinnars.org wrote:
> While about 7 out of the 9 years with Linux have been good, the
> graphical experience on Linux has plummeted for me. I don't really
> want to send prospective customers to Linux any more. I am fearing
> that Windows may end up be
Hi Patrick,
On 05/25/13 02:39, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
Hi Richard
Actually I am not looking for a Windows clone, just a software-correct
GUI. I don't need much too. I need text input widgets and a way to
display graphs. The graphs could be grammatically created images that
are independent of th
25 matches
Mail list logo
