The distfile name is automake-1.11.5.tar.gz and pkg_info reports
1.11.5, but sqlports rejects it.
In the ports tree there are 6 versions:
d530# cd automake
d530# ls
1.10 1.12 1.8 CVS Makefile.inc
1.11 1.4 1.9 Makefile
Alan
On 3/4/1
> For use in the GUI of an application, I need to have a list of detected
> serial and parallel ports. This list is used to fill a combo box where
> the user select the port to use (example: in Windows, it would be a list
> with COM1,COM2, etc.
>
> On OpenBSD, how can we retrieve the detected s
Hi,
For use in the GUI of an application, I need to have a list of detected
serial and parallel ports. This list is used to fill a combo box where
the user select the port to use (example: in Windows, it would be a list
with COM1,COM2, etc.
On OpenBSD, how can we retrieve the detected serial
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:04:51AM -0500, Alan Corey wrote:
> I'm defining
> setenv AUTOMAKE_VERSION 1.11.5
> In my .cshrc, I don't know why exactly.
The value should be 1.11 not 1.11.5.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clea
On 2013-03-03, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > I have a problem with a Digitus USB 2.0 repeater cable in
> > combination with a Soekris net5501 running OpenBSD 5.2 (see full
> > dmesg at the very end of this mail).
> Is this an active device? Essentially a single-port hub?
Exactly.
> > However
This is probably where it came from:
d530# pkg_info | grep automake
automake-1.10.3p6 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator
automake-1.11.5p1 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator
automake-1.9.6p10 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator
I was defining AUTOMAKE_VERSION to the l
I'm defining
setenv AUTOMAKE_VERSION 1.11.5
In my .cshrc, I don't know why exactly.
--
Credit is the root of all evil. - AB1JX
While installing sqlports from ports under openbsd 5.2 I got
pass #2
+++ converters/ruby-json,rbx
+++ databases/db/v4,bootstrap,no_java,no_tcl
>> Broken dependency: devel/automake/1.11.5 non existent
+++ databases/ruby-activerecord,ruby19
Died at /usr/ports/databases/sqlports/files/mksqlitedb line
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 03:10:38PM -0800, Jeff Richards wrote:
> I have been trying to configure a HP Pavilion dv5000(5210us) laptop to connect
> to a WEP network.? I have tried OBSD 5.2 and CURRENT without success using WEP
> but can connect with WPA --personal hotspot.
>
>
> The network interfa
On 2013-03-03, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Ingo Feinerer wrote:
>
>> I have a problem with a Digitus USB 2.0 repeater cable in combination with a
>> Soekris net5501 running OpenBSD 5.2 (see full dmesg at the very end of this
>> mail).
>
> Is this an active device? Essentially a single-port hub
I have been trying to configure a HP Pavilion dv5000(5210us) laptop to connect
to a WEP network. I have tried OBSD 5.2 and CURRENT without success using WEP
but can connect with WPA --personal hotspot.
The network interfaces I have
tried are
Integrated wireless (bwi0 at pci3 dev 2 function 0
Sean Shoufu Luo writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Does OBSD support real 802.11n? It seems not. Although many 802.11n devices
> are claimed supported, 802.11n capability is mostly not excluded, like
> run(4), otus(4), urtwn(4).
This has already been asked many times in the past.
>From the manpage of one of
I got it working!!!
What Joel said was key. I had probably done it wrong the first time (didn't
use the b option in disklabel), and everytime I re-tried it after that, I
wasn't starting from scratch (zero'ing the two raid drives). So I booted
the SeaTools for DOS CD, and zero'ed the two 3TB drives
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 22:02, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> [weerd@despair] $ ls -l /tmp/test/* | awk '{SUM+=$5} END {print SUM}'
heh. :)
~/bin> cat filesizes
#!/bin/sh
ls -l $@ | awk '{sum += $5} END { print sum }'
Hi,
Does OBSD support real 802.11n? It seems not. Although many 802.11n devices
are claimed supported, 802.11n capability is mostly not excluded, like
run(4), otus(4), urtwn(4).
And, btw, how to find the official status page, for example, about
supported hardward, the list provided in the page
ht
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 07:54:07PM +0100, Robert wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:35:29 -0500
> Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:15:54AM -0600, Brandon Tanner wrote:
> > > Joel,
> > >
> > > Would the fact that my two 3TB drives (ST3000DM001) use 4k sectors be the
> > > rea
Not really an answer to your question, I know, but what would such a
number mean ? What use do you have for it ?
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:01:25AM +0800, f5b wrote:
| for example
|
| 1.
| there is only two file in /home/test/
| # ls -l /home/test/
| total 8
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Mar 3
On 03/03/13 20:17, Nick Holland wrote:
On 03/03/13 00:34, Joel Sing wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Brandon Tanner wrote:
...
OpenBSD area: 64-5860533168; size: 2.7T; free: 0.0T
#size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 2.7T 64RAID
c:
On 03/03/13 00:34, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Brandon Tanner wrote:
...
>> OpenBSD area: 64-5860533168; size: 2.7T; free: 0.0T
>> #size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
>> a: 2.7T 64RAID
>> c: 2.7T0
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 07:54:07PM +0100, Robert wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:35:29 -0500
> Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:15:54AM -0600, Brandon Tanner wrote:
> > > Joel,
> > >
> > > Would the fact that my two 3TB drives (ST3000DM001) use 4k sectors be the
> > > re
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:35:29 -0500
Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:15:54AM -0600, Brandon Tanner wrote:
> > Joel,
> >
> > Would the fact that my two 3TB drives (ST3000DM001) use 4k sectors be the
> > reason I wasn't getting it working then?
>
> Both of the drives in the d
Am 03.03.2013 18:26, schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
Ingo Feinerer wrote:
I have a problem with a Digitus USB 2.0 repeater cable in combination with a
Soekris net5501 running OpenBSD 5.2 (see full dmesg at the very end of this
mail).
Is this an active device? Essentially a single-port hub?
H
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:15:54AM -0600, Brandon Tanner wrote:
> Joel,
>
> Would the fact that my two 3TB drives (ST3000DM001) use 4k sectors be the
> reason I wasn't getting it working then?
Both of the drives in the dmesg you posted report 512-byte sectors.
Ken
>
> I will try to zero t
Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> I have a problem with a Digitus USB 2.0 repeater cable in combination with a
> Soekris net5501 running OpenBSD 5.2 (see full dmesg at the very end of this
> mail).
Is this an active device? Essentially a single-port hub?
> However, the problem occurs when I attach the re
Joel,
Would the fact that my two 3TB drives (ST3000DM001) use 4k sectors be the
reason I wasn't getting it working then?
I will try to zero the drives and start from scratch again, and see if that
works too. I had a feeling that deleting the disklabels with 'z' option
wasn't actually getting thin
for example
1.
there is only two file in /home/test/
# ls -l /home/test/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Mar 3 23:29 a.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3 Mar 3 23:29 b.txt
So the total size of all files ( a.txt + b.txt ) should be 5 Bytes.
How to get total size ( 5 Bytes ) directly but not t
2013/3/2 Friedrich Locke :
> just wonder in a typical hard drive nowadays (SATA/SAS), the sector 0
> is in the inner or outter track ?
> Which tracks are faster: the inner ones or the outter ?
First track is outer-most, hence faster linear transfer rates at
beginning of disk, e.g.
http://mralpha.s
On 03/03/13 00:04, Shoufu Luo wrote:
usually, the inner tracks are fast, as I know
Since the RPM is constant and they can fit more data can on the outer,
longer, tracks, I believe you are wrong.
Not that it matters, since we don't know which ones we're served.
/Alexander
-Shoufu
Live, L
[- Sun 3.Mar'13 at 13:35:15 +0100 Marc Espie :-]
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:58:40AM +, James Griffin wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I did a fresh install of the latest snapshot Feb 27. Installed Firefox
> > 18 package. When it loads, I get an error I do not understand:
> >
> > fir
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:58:40AM +, James Griffin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did a fresh install of the latest snapshot Feb 27. Installed Firefox
> 18 package. When it loads, I get an error I do not understand:
>
> firefox:/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.55.0: /usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.14.0 :
> WARNING: sy
Hi
I did a fresh install of the latest snapshot Feb 27. Installed Firefox
18 package. When it loads, I get an error I do not understand:
firefox:/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.55.0: /usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.14.0 :
WARNING: symbol(_ZN11__gnu_debug17_S_debug_messagesE) size mismatch,
relink your program
The following part of the scanf(3) manpage
probably needs to be reworded:
The value
.Dv EOF
is returned if an input failure occurs before any conversion such as an
end-of-file occurs.
(I won't even attempt it, as I am not sure
what the behaviour actually is.)
Hoi once more,
Closure on this.
2013/2/24 Stuart Henderson :
> On 2013-02-24, Pim van Pelt wrote:
>> .. , or the DSL has untrained
>
> It does seem like the line could well be dropping out then.
.. and that was it. I have since replaced the DSL modem with a
Fritz!Box 7390 and the line has been u
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Is your cable a usb2.0 only cable, or a usb1.1 only cable or some
> combination that won't work?
The product description of the USB repeater cable claims:
- "Compatible with USB specification revision 2.0 and 1.1"
- "Supports USB lo
34 matches
Mail list logo
