On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 02/08/13 11:26, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> >>> While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
> >>> supported (for a variety of reaso
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 05:54 +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> I have two nodes side by side. KVM switches for just
> usb are almost imposible to find in my area. I plan
> to use usb keyboard and usb mouse only, since my mo-
> nitor has two adapters for both boxen.
> Is it possible to use plain usb hub to
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-08, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> >| What kind of hardware do you have powering those machines? Besides,
> >| I don't use the crypto partition too often and I really should make
I have two nodes side by side. KVM switches for just
usb are almost imposible to find in my area. I plan
to use usb keyboard and usb mouse only, since my mo-
nitor has two adapters for both boxen.
Is it possible to use plain usb hub to do the job?
One of the nodes would be openbsd 5.2 amd64.
Best r
Rodolfo Gouveia [rgouv...@cosmico.net] wrote:
> Hi all,
> It seems that the support for 5720 was backout because
> it broke another chipset. [1]
> The thing is that the newer Dell R320 has this chipset and
> I'm currently evaluating the its support.
> So I would like to know if the support would i
Robert Blacquiere [open...@blacquiere.nl] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen on the tech mailing list a patch for implementing a pppx
> interface group (just one line code addition). Is this going to be in
> 5.3 release? It would make PF filtering much nicer with many dynamic
> ipsec/l2tp connections.
>
On Thu Feb 7 2013 17:50, Jan Lambertz wrote:
> I also tried the socket trick in different setups but couldn't make it
> work.
You *do* boot bsd.mp, right? Because bsd.rd never recognised a such
configured VM as being SMP-capable in my case, and installed bsd.sp by
default, instead.
> I tried a s
On 2013-02-08, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
>| What kind of hardware do you have powering those machines? Besides,
>| I don't use the crypto partition too often and I really should make
>| it smaller (it's only at 17% capacity out of 1.4T
On 08.02.13 20:34, Mike Larkin wrote:
Kernels other than GENERIC/GENERIC.MP and RAMDISK aren't supported by
devs.
Ok, sorry for the noise.
That being said, we should probably clean up the do_real_mode_post
business at some point. I think it's outlived its usefulness.
I found the problem. I
On 02/08/13 15:19, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Admittedly, these are pretty powerful machines. And Antoine was
right, it's amd64 (I don't have i386 in real day-to-day use anymore).
I have a couple of P4s (no HT) running i386 (firewall, and my web/db
server), but otherwise everything is amd64.
But
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
| What kind of hardware do you have powering those machines? Besides,
| I don't use the crypto partition too often and I really should make
| it smaller (it's only at 17% capacity out of 1.4TB).
Admittedly, these are pretty powerful
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:56:08PM +0100, Christian Groessler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to make a kernel config which only includes what I need. It's
> attached.
>
> The resulting kernel crashes in vga_pci_attach() when it writes to
> do_real_mode_post.
> do_real_mode_post is in the text sect
On 02/08/13 13:32, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
| Either way, it sounds fantastic and having "smooth" RAID (esp.
| crypto) operations, l think, would be a huge feather in OpenBSD's
| cap. I haven't tried full disk encryption yet, maybe on
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> | Either way, it sounds fantastic and having "smooth" RAID (esp.
> | crypto) operations, l think, would be a huge feather in OpenBSD's
> | cap. I haven't tried full d
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
| Either way, it sounds fantastic and having "smooth" RAID (esp.
| crypto) operations, l think, would be a huge feather in OpenBSD's
| cap. I haven't tried full disk encryption yet, maybe on a test box
| one day, because I just don't
On 02/08/13 13:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
Shit, I forgot to mention that I already gave that a whirl by putting:
umount -f /st3 <-- the mount point of the crypto volume
in /etc/rc.shutdown. It makes no difference; I still get th
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Christian Groessler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to make a kernel config which only includes what I need. It's
> attached.
>
> The resulting kernel crashes in vga_pci_attach() when it writes to
> do_real_mode_post.
> do_real_mode_post is in the text section, so shou
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> Shit, I forgot to mention that I already gave that a whirl by putting:
>
> umount -f /st3 <-- the mount point of the crypto volume
>
> in /etc/rc.shutdown. It makes no difference; I still get that
> warning/error.
>
> I also tri
Hi,
I've tried to make a kernel config which only includes what I need. It's
attached.
The resulting kernel crashes in vga_pci_attach() when it writes to
do_real_mode_post.
do_real_mode_post is in the text section, so should be readonly,
therefore the crash makes sense.
But when I build GENER
On 02/08/13 11:26, Joel Sing wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
supported (for a variety of reasons). The problem that you mention above
is due to the way that
So is there any point in having bruteforce for httpd? Especially now that
"mobile is the future"?
Mikkel
2013/2/7 Mikkel Bang
> > I forget if mobiles do more prefetching on dns and/or tcp on mobiles but
> > perhaps that's worth considering as a culprit.
>
> My God Kevin, that's gotta be it!
>
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 03:26:33AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > Would stackable softraid volumes work in near future or is it big
> > problem as how softraid was designed?
>
> Generally speaking they already "work" - there are just some caveats,
> primarily relating to assembly and shutdown. Most
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
> > supported (for a variety of reasons). The problem that you mention above
> > is due to the way that softraid volumes are shut
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
> supported (for a variety of reasons). The problem that you mention above is
> due to the way that softraid volumes are shutdown - the shutdown order is
> approxim
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Scott McEachern wrote:
> I get a rather curious error when shutting down a machine with a RAID 1
> setup that contains a crypto partition and a "normal" partition:
>
> syncing disks... done
> sd3 detached
> softraid0: I/O error 5 on dev 0x433 at block 16
> softraid0: could not w
On 2013-02-08, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 08:23 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013-02-07, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> > Thanks for all the quick responses, but if I understand you all
>> > correctly there is no way to cut off an established connection by adding
>> > a
On 08/02/13 15:34, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Kapetanakis Giannis(bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr) on 2013.02.08 14:32:21 +0200:
On 07/02/13 15:50, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
[snip]
which version of OpenBSD are you using?
I've been using 5.2 release, but yesterday I've installed latest
snapshot (am
Kapetanakis Giannis(bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr) on 2013.02.08 14:32:21 +0200:
> On 07/02/13 15:50, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
[snip]
which version of OpenBSD are you using?
On 07/02/13 15:50, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use an OB server as an icecast streaming server. I'm
also trying to use relayd
as a relay between the client and icecast server to limit access to
admin pages of icecast.
I have a problem with relayd closing connections. I belie
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 08:23 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-07, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Thanks for all the quick responses, but if I understand you all
> > correctly there is no way to cut off an established connection by adding
> > an ip address to a blocked table, so I'm still l
--> patrick keshishian [2013-02-07 12:16:40 -0800]:
> look in 'man pfctl' and search for killing active sessions.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Martijn van Duren
> wrote:
> > Hello misc,
> >
> > Today I watch the current connections on my small home server and I
> > noticed an unfami
On 2013-02-07, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Thanks for all the quick responses, but if I understand you all
> correctly there is no way to cut off an established connection by adding
> an ip address to a blocked table, so I'm still left with my two stage
> drop off the connection (both adding the th
32 matches
Mail list logo
