On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 08:13:33AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 07:39:27AM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
|
| > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:34:44AM -0300, Carlo Borelli wrote:
| > | > If you claim to be a unix administrator, learn ed.
| > | >
| > |
| > | Sorry, completely wro
You would fail any system administration course I teach.
On 12/01/2013, at 15:34, Carlo Borelli wrote:
> 2013/1/12 Nick Holland
>
>> On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>> ...
>>> Btw, how many are really using ed everyday, now in 2013? I believe I'm
>> not
>>> the only one who thinks th
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 07:39:27AM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:34:44AM -0300, Carlo Borelli wrote:
> | > If you claim to be a unix administrator, learn ed.
> | >
> |
> | Sorry, completely wrong. An unix admin use only vi not wordstar or ed.
>
> You know vi but you do
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:34:44AM -0300, Carlo Borelli wrote:
| > If you claim to be a unix administrator, learn ed.
| >
|
| Sorry, completely wrong. An unix admin use only vi not wordstar or ed.
You know vi but you don't know ed. Right. Know your software and its
history - vi is ed with visua
2013/1/12 Christopher Vance
> You would fail any system administration course I teach.
>
I respect your opinion.
Are you a teacher and not teaching the basic ones? Proudly failing any
course you do.
What else?
Btw, Paolo Aglialoro +1
Registered Linux User #249354
"Ad astra per aspera"
2013/1/12 Nick Holland
> On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> ...
> > Btw, how many are really using ed everyday, now in 2013? I believe I'm
> not
> > the only one who thinks this. My guess is that vi could be more
> appreciated
> > by most of the user base more than ed.
>
> If you claim t
On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
...
> Btw, how many are really using ed everyday, now in 2013? I believe I'm not
> the only one who thinks this. My guess is that vi could be more appreciated
> by most of the user base more than ed.
If you claim to be a unix administrator, learn ed.
If y
Hello!
I was trying to build a piece of software that uses Image::Magick, when I ran
into the following problem on amd64 -current:
$ perl -e "use Image::Magick;"
Can't load
'/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/amd64-openbsd/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so'
for module Image::Magick: Cannot load s
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:44:07PM -0800, Kent Fritz wrote:
> I dug a little deeper, and defined PCKBCDEBUG in
> /usr/src/sys/dev/ic/pckbc.c, and it spews:
> pckbc_cmd: lost 0xfc
>
> Looking at pckbc_poll_cmd1, it looks like there's an infinite loop if
> it doesn't get back a response it expects.
Jeremy Evans wrote:
> 1) Switch from cpio -pdum to pax -rw -p e.
Seems fine to me.
> I'm not sure if there are other reasons to use cpio over pax.
Nope. On OpenBSD, tar/cpio/pax are all frontends to the same program
anyway.
> However, when I replaced I disk last night and tried to use cpio
>
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> plus, last i checked, firefox was not even 64-bit friendly anyways
Bullshit.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
I dug a little deeper, and defined PCKBCDEBUG in
/usr/src/sys/dev/ic/pckbc.c, and it spews:
pckbc_cmd: lost 0xfc
Looking at pckbc_poll_cmd1, it looks like there's an infinite loop if
it doesn't get back a response it expects. What's best: specifically
handling 0xfc, or erroring out on any unexpec
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/login.conf.in
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/mklogin.conf
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=login.conf&sektion=5
plus, last i checked, firefox was not even 64-bit friendly anyways
C.
On 11 January 2013 15:28, Lars von den Dr
Hi again,
I just followed the FAQ 14.5.3 and created a swap file and added it to
the system. Unfortunately this didn't help.
Thanks again
Lars
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Lars von den Driesch
wrote:
> Hi
> I just discovered another strangeness on my installation. Firefox
> keeps seg-faul
> The only editing available tool in bsd.rd, the infamous ed, made me sweat
> cold with fear not to correctly spell its syntax or do some logic mistake.
> I would have been way more lighthearted if I had vi available.
Actually, vi used to be in the installation media, 15 years ago. Lack of
space c
Hello misc,
there were recently some comments about customizing bsd.rd contents and
making one of own's choice/taste. This reminded me about an unpleasant
situation in which I found myself kinda 2 years ago:
sparc64 machine, a neglected typo in fstab while changing a disk mountpoint
and boom! - n
Zoran Kolic [zko...@sbb.rs] wrote:
>
> Yeah, I like amd better. On desktop it is 8120 bulldozer. And I
> like it.
>
> I might bother gentle readers, but have no clue what to buy and
> stay alive. I need exact processor name. So, if someone has amd
> or intel, integrated, wirking on amd64 5.2, ple
Hello,
I'm currently working on porting OpenBSD to the Freescale i.MX6, an ARM
Cortex-A9 (1-4 cores).
It is already supporting USB and SDMMC, works like a charm.
The i.MX6 itself got some interesting features like PCIe, SATA and Gigabit
Ethernet.
So, if 200$ don't sound too much, that might be an
Two changes:
1) Switch from cpio -pdum to pax -rw -p e. cpio -pdum requires
find which isn't available on bsd.rd, while pax -rw -p e works
fine on bsd.rd.
2) Use a more complete example.
I'm not sure if there are other reasons to use cpio over pax.
However, when I replaced I disk last night and
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:16:53PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/01/13(Thu) 14:08, Kent Fritz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > Can you please try to find out which protocol probe routine is
> > > responsible for hanging the machine?
> > >
> > None of
> Sadly right now Intel is going to be the best if you are going to use
> the integrated graphics. Intel graphics tend to be better supported than
> AMD (ATI).
I already have freebsd desktop and laptop. I want to get small
box, to put it in a corner, left in my room and play with it.
The only sm
On 1/10/2013 7:15 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
I found it too hard to find proper laptop for sane sum
of green papers, to run openbsd amd64.
In a haze of quest, I set my eyes on two lovely comp
cases:
chieftec bt-02b-180
silverstone sg05
Digested question would be: what integrated cpu works
on 5.2 amd6
I can try. Theo also sent me some ideas to try which involved cutting
out PCI Express hotplug support from
sys/dev/pci/ppb.c
Do you have reason to believe this has been fixed?
-Jim
On 1/11/13 8:25 AM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Jim Miller(jmil...@sri-inc.com) on 2013.01.09 15:20:03 -0500:
>> Hi
On 10 January 2013 22:21, Matt Morrow wrote:
> You do realize the typical life of a battery is about a year?
Poppycock.
My FondletopPro battery still gives damn close to the performance
it gave new in early 2011. The battery in my Fondleslab 3GS is
near 4 years now and hasn't degraded that muc
Erling Westenvik gmail.com> writes:
>
> Is it possible to have PF filter on MAC address on a machine with only
> one physical nic? I'm aware that MAC filtering can only be done on a
> machine configured as a bridge, but how to configure such a bridge?
afaik, bridge(4) mac filtering only affects
On 10/01/13(Thu) 14:08, Kent Fritz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Can you please try to find out which protocol probe routine is
> > responsible for hanging the machine?
> >
> None of them. I tried as you suggested, then just #if'd out every
> entry in that
26 matches
Mail list logo
