OK, as we all predicted, this was just a PEBCAK. It works find whether [a] or
[d].
Thanks for the help - I appreciate it.
Cheers,
-- Greg
--
View this message in context:
http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/softraid-to-encrypt-AND-raid-tp219721p219997.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mai
OK,
now got the soultion. I moved the statement blackhole within in the options
{} and now is accepted.
I was trying to use it in zones, which is not recognized.
Sorry for the noise.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Well,
>
> thanks for answer, but I still get the sam
Well,
thanks for answer, but I still get the same problem. I tried to put
blackhole out of zone statement in the general area, but the error is still
the same:
# grep blackhole named.conf
blackhole { spooferz; };
# named-checkconf ./named.conf
./named.conf:18: unknown option 'blackhole'
I'm get
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> This is 5.2 on sparc64.
> Both in BIND9 admin guide and in man named.conf the option "blackhole" is
> present.
> Nevertheless, this is the story:
>
> # named-checkconf -t /var/named/
> /etc/named.conf:111: unknown option 'blackhole'
...
> Is
Hello,
This is 5.2 on sparc64.
Both in BIND9 admin guide and in man named.conf the option "blackhole" is
present.
Nevertheless, this is the story:
# named-checkconf -t /var/named/
/etc/named.conf:111: unknown option 'blackhole'
Now, the idea is to create an acl of possible fake IPs of spoofers a
now I got the installation log of current trying the amd64 distro:
-
CD-ROM: 9F
Loading /5.2/AMD64/CDBOOT
probing: pc0 mem[620K 2046M a20=on]
disk: hd0+* cd0
>> OpenBSD/amd64 CDBOOT 3.19
boot>
booting cd0a:/5.2/amd64/bsd.rd: 3046708
8]=0xb8eb78
entry point at 0x1001e0 [7205c766, 34
Maximo Pech wrote:
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more incredible, that there isn't a single production re
2012/12/6 Maximo Pech :
> I'd like to know your thoughts about this.
Shut up and show us your code.
On 12/06/2012 08:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
> that there isn't a single production ready, gnupg-like, BSD licensed
> tool out there (I don't have the skills and time to program one
> myself).
NetBSD has netpgp, which is BSD licensed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpgp
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
> It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
> have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
> core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
> even more incredible,
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more incredible, that there isn't a single production ready,
gnupg-like, BSD
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am a happy user of spectrwm, trying to configure a dualheaded X the way I
>> want. I now have two monitors connected to the same card.
>> what I want is that my monitors to behave in completely independent manner,
>> with some applications putting its windows only on monitor0,
> I don't know anything about
> spectrwm (or KDE or X for that matter :)
You can have two displays in xorg.conf or one split in two on two
screens as well as some other modes. There are various benefits to each
depending on the need for dragging and fullscreen etc.. So an app can
remember the ge
Quoting Gregory Edigarov :
Hello,
I am a happy user of spectrwm, trying to configure a dualheaded X
the way I want. I now have two monitors connected to the same card.
what I want is that my monitors to behave in completely independent
manner, with some applications putting its windows only
Hello,
I am a happy user of spectrwm, trying to configure a dualheaded X the
way I want. I now have two monitors connected to the same card.
what I want is that my monitors to behave in completely independent
manner, with some applications putting its windows only on monitor0,
while others put
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:02:09PM +0100, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
> umass0 at uhub7 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Sony USB Floppy
> Drive" rev 1.10/6.01 addr 3
> umass0: using UFI over CBI with CCI
> scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
> sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: ATAPI 0/dir
>
> From: MERIGHI Marcus
> Sent: Thu Dec 06 14:02:09 CET 2012
> To:
> Subject: floppy attached as sd with notebook bay, fdformat(1)
>
>
> Hello people,
>
> I found a dell 'floppy drive module' (3.5") for my
>
> hw.vendor=Dell Inc.
> hw.product=Latit
This is what I use to re-ports, re-src comfortably
Both good for 1st and following times
I named it "re-portssrc"
---
#!/bin/sh
plain=$(echo '\033[0m')
redfg=$(echo '\033[1;31m')
greenfg=$(echo '\033[1;32m')
y
Hello people,
I found a dell 'floppy drive module' (3.5") for my
hw.vendor=Dell Inc.
hw.product=Latitude D630
hw.serialno=6P8454J
When inserted (before boot) it shows up as (full dmesg below):
umass0 at uhub7 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Sony USB Floppy
Drive" rev 1.10/6.01 ad
Can't you use /upgrade.site[1]?
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#site
On 4 December 2012 21:59, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:44:59PM +, Heptas Torres wrote:
> > Thanks. What I meant was more things like the script
> > http://gouloum.fr/code/script/install_snap
20 matches
Mail list logo
