On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Brett wrote:
>> 3) Other than the dmesg/sensor info which will go to dm...@openbsd.org,
>> where should I send the additional info? If there's no suitable place,
>> I can just keep it around and let anyone who needs it ask me for it.
>
>http://www.nycbug.org/?action=dmesgd&ad
> > (For sake of the argument: pfctl has options, maybe they should be a
> > rc.conf option for it?)
>
> pfctl is not a daemon per se, as opposed to e.g. smtpd or httpd.
>
> As far as enabling pf and loading the ruleset, only a subset of the
> pfctl flags are of interest.
>
> Therefore, there i
> 3) Other than the dmesg/sensor info which will go to dm...@openbsd.org,
> where should I send the additional info? If there's no suitable place,
> I can just keep it around and let anyone who needs it ask me for it.
>
> Dave
>
http://www.nycbug.org/?action=dmesgd&add=1
On 08/25/12 21:08, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200
Mikkel Bang wrote:
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=""
named_flags=""
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
You may still want to be able to pass special
Þðèäè÷åñêîå ïðîòèâîäåéñòâèå áàíêàì
Êàê çàùèòèòü ñåáÿ è ñâîé áèçíåñ îò ïðîòèâîïðàâíûõ äåéñòâèé áàíêà?
Êàê îñóùåñòâèòü ðàñòîðæåíèå êðåäèòà íà çàêîííûõ îñíîâàíèÿõ?
Êàê èçáåæàòü ñóäà ñ áàíêîì?
Êàê èçáåæàòü àðåñòà èìóùåñòâà?
Êàê ñîâåðøèòü âûâîä èç çàëîãà èìóùåñòâà?
 àäâîêàòñêîé êîìïàíèè Âàì ïîìîãóò â
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200
Mikkel Bang wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
>
> pf=YES
> sshd=""
> named_flags=""
>
> but rather
>
> pf=YES
> sshd=YES
> named=YES?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mikkel
>
pf doesn't have options for sta
A year or so ago, as part of selecting a notebook to buy, I gathered
dmesg info from all of the notebooks I could find in local stores
(booting from and saving data to a USB stick) and sent it to
dm...@openbsd.org as well as using it myself. Since I expect that it
would be useful to the developers
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=""
named_flags=""
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
Thanks!
Mikkel
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 09:54:25AM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> > I never intended to imply that -P had anything to do with creation. I
> > simply meant that you would have to run bioctl with the -P option twice,
> > once for each
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 09:54:25AM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> I never intended to imply that -P had anything to do with creation. I
> simply meant that you would have to run bioctl with the -P option twice,
> once for each partition when changing your passphrase.
Does that imply that one may ch
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> >
> > It is possible if you use different partitions on the same drive, however,
> > you would have to run -P twice ( once for each volume ).
> >
>
> Sorry for not mention
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
>
> It is possible if you use different partitions on the same drive, however,
> you would have to run -P twice ( once for each volume ).
>
Sorry for not mentioning that I'm aware about the possibility of having
several mini partitions on th
On Aug 24, 2012 8:48 PM, "Erling Westenvik"
wrote:
>
> According to http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20110530221728
> I've set up fully encrypted disk by using the bioctl(4) feature for
> specifying a key disk
>
> # bioctl -C force -c C -l /dev/wd0d -k /dev/sd0d softraid0
>
> and i
13 matches
Mail list logo
