andrea.jpg
miranda.jpg
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
9f183befcab3ac8b2011967ba1a4d0a9]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
43ed3e5be87b0997c059fa628c4a618b]
I'm sure IndieGoGo would be happy to help out. Worked for Matthew Inman anyway.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>
>> On 17 Jul 2012, at 13:50, Gerald Thornberry wrote:
>>
>>> For those of us who don't have the hardw
Is there nobody with a config that allows pmtu discovery with ipsec?
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:49:31PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi misc@
>
> We got notice from a customer who connects to us through an ipsec tunnel
> that loading websites on our site is really slow. On our site we use
> Open
>> how can loongson 3 be (roughly) compared to x86 CPUs in performance?
>
>It's slower. A hell lot slower.
>
>3A systems are running at around 1GHz. The x86 code translation stuff
>was benchmark-only and, to the best of my knowledge, has never been made
>public (with full source code and acceptable
Thanks for the great work and the informative posts. I'm saving the info for
future reference. Especially the history on the Loongson line is great to
know.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, Jul
> where are Loongson 3 based computers available?
In dreamland only.
> how can loongson 3 be (roughly) compared to x86 CPUs in performance?
It's slower. A hell lot slower.
3A systems are running at around 1GHz. The x86 code translation stuff
was benchmark-only and, to the best of my knowledge,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> This is still based on the fairly old Loongson 2F; the gen-3 CPUs being
>> available only in laptops, right? Not the easiest naming scheme to
>> follow...
>
> Nope, you are confusing things.
>
> 1, 1A, 1B: 32-bit only processors. Move along.
>
> This is still based on the fairly old Loongson 2F; the gen-3 CPUs being
> available only in laptops, right? Not the easiest naming scheme to
> follow...
Nope, you are confusing things.
1, 1A, 1B: 32-bit only processors. Move along.
2, 2A, 2B, 2C: 64-bit but extra instructions conflict with off
> Note that all this is because of PMON bugs, we did our best to
> circumvent the bugs, but this is the best we can do.
No, we can do better. The real pie-in-the-sky fix is to do what had been
done on hp300 30 years ago: make the bootloader actually be a kernel
without userland, scheduling and in
On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2012, at 13:50, Gerald Thornberry wrote:
>
>> For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
>> fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
>> hardware where it's needed.
>
> I need t
On 17 Jul 2012, at 13:50, Gerald Thornberry wrote:
> For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
> fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
> hardware where it's needed.
I need to get a SS20 to phessler@ from the Uk to Germany if people want t
FESTIVAL LE CHIEN A PLUMES /// 2.3.4.5 AOUT 2012
LANGRES - Lac de Villegusien - 52
QUOI DE NEUF ?? Au chien à plumes ...
_
___
LA PROGRAMMATION DEFINITIVE !!
Après les bonnes surprises que sont les
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:32:38PM +0100, percy piper wrote:
> I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I
> assume you want it that way for a reason.
>
ok that's too verbose indeed.
> It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-)
>
no i can understand, i us
I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I
assume you want it that way for a reason.
It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-)
Thanks for looking Gilles.
Percy.
On 17 July 2012 19:04, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> mh, is it really that verbose ?
mh, is it really that verbose ?
Gilles
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:54:41PM +0100, percy piper wrote:
> Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose?
>
> Cheers,
> Percy.
>
> Index: scheduler.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs
Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose?
Cheers,
Percy.
Index: scheduler.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/scheduler.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 scheduler.c
--- scheduler.c 10 Jul 2012 11:1
Bonjour,
NORD SUD TELECOM vous propose des solutions innovantes pour
lâenregistrement des conversations téléphoniques de lâentreprise.
Notre méthode de travailler a changé, La téléphonie est devenue un outil
Incontournable dans le monde professionnel. Un grand nombre de communications
>Can anyone help with a little amd problem?
>
>I have some partitions on SSD and some on HD and would like to use
>amd(8) so that the HD filesystems are only mounted on-demand, reducing
>fsck time in a crash.
>
>I've got them mounting OK...
>
>$ cat /etc/amd/master
>-c 60 -x all -l syslog /a bamboo
This is still based on the fairly old Loongson 2F; the gen-3 CPUs being
available only in laptops, right? Not the easiest naming scheme to follow...
-- p
Argg, was using the wrong names.
Notebook is called Yeeloong, mini-PC Fuloong. Processor Loongson.
-Otto
where are Loongson 3 b
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>
>> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > On
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, Jul
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:09:54AM +, John Long wrote:
>> > >
>>
>> > I see now th
© 2012 Conference Corporativo S.C. Incluye Temas Críticos Sobre:
Cierre de Gestión, Observaciones y Responsabilidades
Asista a los 46 Mejores Cursos en México de la Serie:
ENTREGA-RECEPCIÓN
LIBRO BLANCO Y MEMORIAS DOCUMENTALES Cursos, Contenidos y Metodologías
Desarrollados en Alianza con las
My university had plenty of those 7 years ago
institue galilée / universitée paris XIII
they may have dumped them
2012/7/17 Johan Ryberg
> Good idea! That is a nice way of helping
>
> // Johan
>
> 2012/7/17 Gerald Thornberry :
> > For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "ship
Good idea! That is a nice way of helping
// Johan
2012/7/17 Gerald Thornberry :
> For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
> fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
> hardware where it's needed.
For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
hardware where it's needed.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Tom Knienieder wrote:
> I can send a Ross Hypersparc 100 or 125 Mhz if needed ...
>
> Am 17.07.2012
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:43:07PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> anybody?
>
> # xvinfo
> X-Video Extension version 2.2
> screen #0
> no adaptors present
The intel driver in OpenBSD does not support Xv on this chipset yet.
> >vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel HD Graphics 2000" rev 0x09
> >
Nope. This requires KMS, or a large amount of changes to the X driver,
to get working. You'll either need to wait[1] or add the support.
[1] No, we do not have a time frame.
On 2012 Jul 17 (Tue) at 14:43:07 +0300 (+0300), Gregory Edigarov wrote:
:anybody?
:
:# xvinfo
:X-Video Extension version
We do not yet have IPv6 rdomain support. I am working on it, but it is
not yet production ready. After 5.2, for sure.
On 2012 Jul 17 (Tue) at 11:20:08 +0200 (+0200), Krzysztof Kułaj wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I'm trying to make an simple MPLS network. I desided to use OpenBSD, and I
:sucessful implemented m
I can send a Ross Hypersparc 100 or 125 Mhz if needed ...
Am 17.07.2012 um 10:17 schrieb Peter Kay:
> I have an SS20 in the loft (Manchester, UK) as it's too noisy and slow for
me now. It's very low end though IIRC one CPU @ 40MHz and 32 or 64MB RAM.
Transport to other countries is probably a mit
Hi,
I'm trying to make an simple MPLS network. I desided to use OpenBSD, and I
sucessful implemented mpls ipv4 network by using great document
http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/papers/jeker/MPLS.pdf.(I will use nomenclature
from this document in this post) My network looks similar like network on
page 6
I have an SS20 in the loft (Manchester, UK) as it's too noisy and slow for me
now. It's very low end though IIRC one CPU @ 40MHz and 32 or 64MB RAM.
Transport to other countries is probably a mite expensive due to weight, mind..
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:37:19AM +0200, B
I want to ask if anyone else is seeing the same issue.
My bgp session is still dropping with "bad VPNv4 withdraw prefix", and I
got to the point where it looks like the problem is only where
MP_UNREACH_NLRI is set, so only on withdraw routes.
Below is the update packet that breaks the session.
0
On 07/17/2012 08:49 AM, thus Otto Moerbeek spake:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:37:19AM +0200, Bernd wrote:
On 07/17/2012 08:32 AM, thus Matthew Dempsky spake:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Bernd
wrote:
I could provide shell access to a SS20 with 256MByte RAM and two
75MHz SuperSPARC II CPUs
Hello! Is it right mailing list? Please help I am new here.
There is xlife v5.3 cellular automaton laboratory program at
http://openports.se/games/xlife
This program was developed by Eric Raimonds (esr) at 1993-1998. Its
development was also affected by the work of Achim Flammenkamp during the
36 matches
Mail list logo
