I am trying to achieve something I thought would be simple, but
haven't had any luck.
I have an OpenBSD 5.0 router/firewall with public IP X.X.X.A
Behind it are a mix of OpenBSD and Linux systems, all with public IP. NO NAT.
I run ssh on an alternate port, XXX22. However, from a certain
locatio
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Norman Golisz wrote:
Hi Darrel,
On Tue Jun 26 2012 14:58, Darrel wrote:
We have less limitation on partitioning these days, so /usr/obj
was obvious- actually had that one before. I chose /usr/src and
/usr/local as well, and expect that this was unimportant unless
moving i
Sorry,
OpenBSD generic , 5.1 release.
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:20:19PM +1000, David Diggles wrote:
> I am just curious.
>
> Would someone mind explaining why the clock speed reports
> as different for cpu1? Both cores are on the same cpu.
>
> dmesg|grep ^cpu[0-9]*:
> cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM)
I am just curious.
Would someone mind explaining why the clock speed reports
as different for cpu1? Both cores are on the same cpu.
dmesg|grep ^cpu[0-9]*:
cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D525 @ 1.80GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.81 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MC
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Alexey Suslikov
wrote:
> Remember SOPA/ACTA? If somebody is planning to have a regulation,
> this somebody should take care about tools which guarantee direct, not
> circumstantial, evidence of somebody else broke this regulation.
>
> UEFI implements network stack s
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Theo de Raadt
>> wrote:
I remember some early 5.1 snapshot which installed and successfully run
without /etc/fstab
however, 5.1-RELEA
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> I remember some early 5.1 snapshot which installed and successfully run
>>> without /etc/fstab
>>> however, 5.1-RELEASE came with /etc/fstab
>>>
>>> it would be nice to move system
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> I remember some early 5.1 snapshot which installed and successfully run
>> without /etc/fstab
>> however, 5.1-RELEASE came with /etc/fstab
>>
>> it would be nice to move system from one server to another without having
>> to bother about /etc
On v, júl 08, 2012 at 21:37:47 +0200, Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had similar problems with a SiI3512A card some time ago, and ended up
> using just the internal ports.
>
> Since I had some time today, I installed i386/mp-current on a spare
> computer and tested with two SATA disks. Writing 300GB o
Hi,
I had similar problems with a SiI3512A card some time ago, and ended up
using just the internal ports.
Since I had some time today, I installed i386/mp-current on a spare
computer and tested with two SATA disks. Writing 300GB of zeros (dd) in
parallel to both disks showed no error. So I assum
On Sunday 08 July 2012 14:07:44 Илья Шипицин wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I remember some early 5.1 snapshot which installed and successfully run
> without /etc/fstab
> however, 5.1-RELEASE came with /etc/fstab
>
> it would be nice to move system from one server to another without having
> to bother about /
> I remember some early 5.1 snapshot which installed and successfully run
> without /etc/fstab
> however, 5.1-RELEASE came with /etc/fstab
>
> it would be nice to move system from one server to another without having
> to bother about /etc/fstab (I moved several of them due to buggy hardware).
> i
Hello!
I remember some early 5.1 snapshot which installed and successfully run
without /etc/fstab
however, 5.1-RELEASE came with /etc/fstab
it would be nice to move system from one server to another without having
to bother about /etc/fstab (I moved several of them due to buggy hardware).
is it p
Remember SOPA/ACTA? If somebody is planning to have a regulation,
this somebody should take care about tools which guarantee direct, not
circumstantial, evidence of somebody else broke this regulation.
UEFI implements network stack so it can be a long-standing strategy.
UEFI is about remote monit
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:46:30AM +0100, percy piper wrote:
> Hi all.
> Smtpd.conf(5) states that %a expands to the user before alias resolution
> and %u after. Is it the other way round? I am probably missing something
> but on the latest i386 snap it seems %a and %u do the opposite to what
> smt
Hello,
I am currently trying to build a small OpenBSD home-router using a
Nexcom 2120 appliance.
The setup looks like this:
Computer (192.168.1.99) > Router > Modem > Internet
The router has 6 Intel 82583V GbE interfaces - em0 to em5.
- em0 is configured as the PPPoE uplink.
- em1 is not use
¡Muy Importante!
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este correo, le pedimos que lo arrastre a
su Bandeja de Entrada
Apreciable Ejecutivo:
TIEM de México
Empresa LÃder en Capacitación y Actualización de Capital Humano
Pone a su disposición este Excelente Curso denominado:
"Como Pagar y Mo
17 matches
Mail list logo
