On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
> is any body running OpenBSD as a XEN HVM guest? I have a difficult time
> accomplish that...
Hi,
I'm insane and I do that for a long time, because I don't really have a
lot of options there.
> The XEN guest does boot up and is usabl
On 2012-06-12, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2012-06-12 14:08, Bernd wrote:
>> I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all the
>> routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenOSPFd). I see asymmetric traffic (I
>> thought it to be that way), which itself doesn't really create problems.

© 2012 Conference Corporativo S.C. Asista a los 45 Mejores Cursos en
México de la Serie:ADQUISICIONES y
OBRAS PÚBLICAS Incluye 4 cursos de ALTO IMPACTO para el
CIERRE de GESTIÓN 2012:
1) Taller para la Elaboración Puntual de las Memorias Documentales
2) Curso sobre el L
On Jun 12 23:18:57, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> You might be able to build a GENERIC with a line:
> config bsd root on wd0a
Yes, that does it. A kernel with a hardcoded root device (wd0a)
doesn't have this problem and boots alright. Thank you!
(It seems I will need to do this after every upgrade,
unle
> iirc the kernel gets a boot path from ofw, and tries to map that to a
> unix device to find it's root partition.
On Jun 13 00:23:43, Halvard wrote:
> Try Self-Hypnosis for Personal Growth
I guess I'm about to try that next, actually ...
On Jun 12 23:18:57, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:04:35PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Jun 12 22:20:16, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jun 12 21:27:18, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > > On Jun 12 20:17:38, Ja
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:04:35PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jun 12 22:20:16, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> >
> > > On Jun 12 21:27:18, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > On Jun 12 20:17:38, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > > > There is another problem now
On Jun 12 22:20:16, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Jun 12 21:27:18, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > On Jun 12 20:17:38, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > > There is another problem now though:
> > > > > the booting sequence ends with
> > > > >
> > > > >
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Atenção - Comunicado Importante - Instalação : E-Banking
Bradesco Pessoa Fisica
Prezado Cliente, Bradesco Pessoa Fisica ( E-Banking )
Informamos que o período de uso das suas chaves de
segurança Bradesco expirou. Para continuar utilizando
o mesmo Cartão de Chaves e utilizando aos
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jun 12 21:27:18, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Jun 12 20:17:38, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > There is another problem now though:
> > > > the booting sequence ends with
> > > >
> > > > bootpath /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1:/bsd
> > > >
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:31:38 +0200
>Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>
>> >Some SSD controllers use compression
>
>I wonder if they use the average compression ratio to boost advertised
>capacity?
Define "average" :)
Nah that'd be too obvious given SSDs are often used for video editing.
Manufacturers ar
On 2012-06-12 15:55, Bernd wrote:
What might be the easiest solution to have pf not care about states any
longer -- using 'keep state sloppy'? Or disabling statefulness entirely
(how?)?
If you don't need it, just disable pf. echo pf=NO >>/etc/rc.conf.local
Sloppy tracking could work. Also chec
On Jun 12 21:27:18, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jun 12 20:17:38, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > There is another problem now though:
> > > the booting sequence ends with
> > >
> > > bootpath /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1:/bsd
> > > root device: _
> > >
> > > and that's where it stops, with '_' indicating th
Am 2012-06-12 20:24, schrieb Simon Perreault:
On 2012-06-12 14:08, Bernd wrote:
I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all
the
routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenOSPFd). I see asymmetric
traffic (I
thought it to be that way), which itself doesn't really create
problems
Hi Claudio
Thank you for your very helpful tips. I probably had not enough sleep this
night, and did not saw,
that the bgpd process I killed in the morning was not relay dead. I started a
new one by hand without
consulting ps after kill. And this bgpd was it that run amok. Now I killed it
with -9
On Jun 12 20:17:38, Jan Stary wrote:
> > There is another problem now though:
> > the booting sequence ends with
> >
> > bootpath /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1:/bsd
> > root device: _
> >
> > and that's where it stops, with '_' indicating the cursor.
Also, I cannot actually type anything
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:31:38 +0200
Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >Some SSD controllers use compression
I wonder if they use the average compression ratio to boost advertised
capacity?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:43:55AM +0200, Matthias Cramer wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have a newly set up OpenBSD VM which mainly runs bgpd. I have 2 full IPv6
> and 2 full IPv6 feeds and
> about 20 peerings. The sessions are all up for a bit more than 3 hours now and
> the bgpd session engine uses all
On 2012-06-12 14:08, Bernd wrote:
I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all the
routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenOSPFd). I see asymmetric traffic (I
thought it to be that way), which itself doesn't really create problems.
However, I see problems with ICMP. pf seems to
> There is another problem now though:
> the booting sequence ends with
>
> bootpath /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1:/bsd
> root device: _
>
> and that's where it stops, with '_' indicating the cursor.
>
> It seems the ofwboot problem is solved, but something else is wrong.
> What does
> > > > > hd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@0
> > > > > cd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1
> > > >
> > > > > cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: ATAPI
> > > > > 5/cdrom removable
> > > > > wd0 at wdc1 channel 0 drive 1:
> > > > setenv boot-device /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1:,
Hi list,
I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all the
routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenOSPFd). I see asymmetric traffic (I
thought it to be that way), which itself doesn't really create problems.
However, I see problems with ICMP. pf seems to drop all but the first
Myles Merrell writes:
> Recently, we noticed all of our network traffic inside the
> firewall slowed down to the point where it was difficult to access anything.
> After some nosing around we noticed that f2, the em2 interface which is using
> CARP pfsync, was causing an extremely large amounts o
On Jun 12 09:10:32, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:30:44AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Jun 11 19:54:21, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > > I understand that "hd" and "cd" are just devaliases; in my case,
> > > >
> > > > hd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@0
> > > >
>On 2012-06-12, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>>>On 06/11/12 19:25, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
for solid state disks?
>>>
>>>If you knew what physical block size your SSD worked with, you might --
>>>MIGHT -- see some benefit
We have two open bsd firewalls. f1 and f2. f1 is master and f2 is the
backup using carp.
Recently, we noticed all of our network traffic inside the
firewall slowed down to the point where it was difficult to access anything.
After some nosing around we noticed that f2, the em2 interface which i
Segue abaixo em anexo o documento conforme solicitado.
Obrigada pela preferencia e tenha um bom dia
Baixar : Anexo-Documento.doc (145,9 Kb)
Hello,
Can someone verify if OpenBSD will run on the VIA Artigo A1200?
Specifications:
http://store.viatech.com/protected/product/frontProductDetail.action?id=9540#
02
Processor: 1.0Ghz VIA Eden X2 CPU
Chipset: VIA VX900
VGA: Integrated VIA Chrome 9 HD
LAN Port: 2 VIA VT6130G
I have found infor
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:30:44AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jun 11 19:54:21, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > I understand that "hd" and "cd" are just devaliases; in my case,
> > >
> > > hd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@0
> > > cd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1
> > >
> > > Does that mean tha
On 12.6.2012. 12:32, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> Hello!
>
> is anybody running multiple instances of ftp-proxy in reverse mode?
> I'd afraid of anchor "ftp-proxy/*", ftp-proxy doesn't allow to specify
> anchor, also, many instances of ftp-proxy can break each others anchors.
>
> can somebody provide me
2012/6/12 Илья Шипицин :
> Hello!
>
> is anybody running multiple instances of ftp-proxy in reverse mode?
> I'd afraid of anchor "ftp-proxy/*", ftp-proxy doesn't allow to specify
> anchor, also, many instances of ftp-proxy can break each others anchors.
No, they will not, see prepare_commit() in
/
Hello!
is anybody running multiple instances of ftp-proxy in reverse mode?
I'd afraid of anchor "ftp-proxy/*", ftp-proxy doesn't allow to specify
anchor, also, many instances of ftp-proxy can break each others anchors.
can somebody provide me with example of multiple ftp-proxies ?
Cheers,
Ilya S
On 11/06/12(Mon) 20:23, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > > I got this Mac Mini on my hands, and I would like to install
> > > > > current/macppc on it. According to
> > > > > http://www.openbsd.org/macppc.html#hardware
> > > > > the following MicMini's are supported:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mac mini (Po
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Matthias Cramer
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have a newly set up OpenBSD VM which mainly runs bgpd. I have 2 full IPv6
> and 2 full IPv6 feeds and
> about 20 peerings. The sessions are all up for a bit more than 3 hours now
and
> the bgpd session engine uses all the CPU i
Hi All
I have a newly set up OpenBSD VM which mainly runs bgpd. I have 2 full IPv6
and 2 full IPv6 feeds and
about 20 peerings. The sessions are all up for a bit more than 3 hours now and
the bgpd session engine uses all the CPU it can get.
In a very similar setup the CPU is under 1%.
It's a 5.1
On Jun 11 19:54:21, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > I understand that "hd" and "cd" are just devaliases; in my case,
> >
> > hd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@0
> > cd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1
> >
> > Does that mean that those device aliases are somehow mixed up?
>
> Well, given the dme
On 2012-06-12, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>>On 06/11/12 19:25, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
>>> Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
>>> for solid state disks?
>>
>>If you knew what physical block size your SSD worked with, you might --
>>MIGHT -- see some benefit using t
37 matches
Mail list logo
