On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 00:14, Alan Corey wrote:
> Is there a way to get the name of a file that's open when all you've
> got is a file descriptor?
>
> I'm working on porting something, that I didn't write. with directories
> full of source. I'm seeing a problem with an ioctl being the wrong type
not in obsd
plan 9/linux keep the name as it was opened
think about hardlinks, unlinking and how the kernel only stores the inode #
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Alan Corey wrote:
> Is there a way to get the name of a file that's open when all you've got is
> a file descriptor?
>
> I'm worki
and fstat(1)...
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> The request was specifically for pids...
>
> On 2012-05-04, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
>> I use pktstat from ports...
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>>> The suggestion on this threa
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 14:02 +1000, Peter Ericson wrote:
> Could there be a "KVM" for OpenBSD? I have been wondering for a while if the
> answer is an absolute no because it could never be trustworthy enough, not
> likely to happen because of lack of interest, or somewhere in between.
>
There ce
Is there a way to get the name of a file that's open when all you've
got is a file descriptor?
I'm working on porting something, that I didn't write. with directories
full of source. I'm seeing a problem with an ioctl being the wrong type,
but I'm looking at the code where it happens, I can't
That's OK, I've mostly got it figured out. Having many (10+) tabs open in
Firefox is the main culprit, especially when some of those pages refresh.
I don't trust Yahoo mail anymore, even though I close that tab. mc seems
to use bandwidth for something too.
I've got pktstat running now, I lik
Could there be a "KVM" for OpenBSD? I have been wondering for a while if the
answer is an absolute no because it could never be trustworthy enough, not
likely to happen because of lack of interest, or somewhere in between.
Peter Ericson
On 04/05/2012, at 8:28 PM, Weldon Goree wrote:
> On 05/04/
Para visualizar correctamente este newsletter ingresa a
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.9.29hh.2s.cvjv3xbra1
On 2012-05-04, Laurence Rochfort wrote:
> I can't get any audio output when watching HTML5 videos in Chrome, but
> audio works in xxxterm.
>
> I have installed libvpx (Google VP8 codex) and x264.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/html5 shows a red cross for h.264 but a green
> tick for WebM.
>
> Any sugg
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:26 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The only google hit for "netbsd ignphy" is... your email. ???
>
I may have misremembered the name of the PHY, but iwn(4) in NetBSD
6.0-BETA does produce a PHY named something and doesn't require Intel's
firmware to run. Though this may als
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:33, Weldon Goree wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 07:37 +0100, Laurence Rochfort wrote:
>> I wouldn't recommend the iwn(4) devices. I've had a bad experience even
>> with those in the man page.
>
> YMMV; I've had good results with the 4965 AGN. Of note: NetBSD 6 (in
> beta
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:13:11PM +0100, Laurence Rochfort wrote:
> I can't get any audio output when watching HTML5 videos in Chrome, but
> audio works in xxxterm.
>
> I have installed libvpx (Google VP8 codex) and x264.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/html5 shows a red cross for h.264 but a green
>
hmm, on Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:30:43PM +0100, Laurence Rochfort said that
> I have the same experience with a Toshiba R840 with Intel GT2+ Sandy
> Bridge graphics.
this one has an "Intel GMA 3600". i am not sure thats part of the
sandy family, i dont know.
the pci id is so new, one of the only
I can't get any audio output when watching HTML5 videos in Chrome, but
audio works in xxxterm.
I have installed libvpx (Google VP8 codex) and x264.
http://www.youtube.com/html5 shows a red cross for h.264 but a green
tick for WebM.
Any suggestions?
$ uname -a
OpenBSD puffy-laptop.my.domain 5.1
Hello,
I'm using a recent snapshot install and I see some strange behaviour
from time to time: the ttyC0 is not started and I can't login. The
computer stops loading it after date/time message from the boot and
keyboard login is not possible, ssh is not accepted and hangs forever.
All I can tell i
!Muy Importante!
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este correo, le pedimos que lo arrastre a
su Bandeja de Entrada
TIEM de Mixico
Empresa Lmder en Capacitacisn y Actualizacisn de Capital Humano
Debido a la gran demanda, ponemos nuevamente a su disposicisn este Excelente
Curso denominado:
"Coac
I have the same experience with a Toshiba R840 with Intel GT2+ Sandy
Bridge graphics.
I've found that booting to console or using the vesa driver allows the
laptop to poweroff and suspend/resume correctly, so I'm assuming it's
to do with the fledgling Sandy Bridge graphics support.
I also can't s
A must for persons with long sitting hours
==
This is to certify that I have been prescribing Transval Self-care
products to my patients for the last two years. The feedback has been
very positive, specialy for Back Buddy, Versatile Seat and Lumbar roll.
-
On 05/04/2012 05:41 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-05-04, Edward M wrote:
cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2600 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.60 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,NXE,LONG,S
my apologies for my first post
network topology
home network remote network
3.3.3.3 1.1.1.12.2.2.2 4.4.4.4
-- router_a internet router_b -
|
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:43 -0300, Jeronimo Baldino wrote:
> Is the development cycle the cause of older firefox in packages? But
> firefox isn't shipped with core OS.
No, but binary packages are built against the core OS as shipped, so the
ports people try to approach something like "stability"
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 07:37 +0100, Laurence Rochfort wrote:
> I wouldn't recommend the iwn(4) devices. I've had a bad experience even
> with those in the man page.
YMMV; I've had good results with the 4965 AGN. Of note: NetBSD 6 (in
beta) has a new largely-non-Damien driver with its own PHY (ignph
hi there,
things are looking promising with this little netbook,
but there is room for improvement :]
suspending seems to work, but the problem is waking up.
what happens is, i hear the machine coming up, but there
is no visible sign except the power led going from blinking
orange ("sleeping") to
Because they do...
9.0 is known as stable "for real" 12 isn't known for that yet...
>
> From: David Coppa
> Sent: Fri May 04 15:43:21 CEST 2012
> To: misc
> Subject: Re: Why so old firefox in 5.1?
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Jeronimo Baldino
>
Thanks a lot for the answer.
JB
Em 04/05/2012 11:37, Christian Weisgerber escreveu:
Jeronimo Baldino wrote:
I just want to know: why OpenBSD provides Firefox 9.0.1 in packages when
the latest stable release (12.0, according to Mozilla) was launched in
April 24, 2012.
The packages for the O
Is the development cycle the cause of older firefox in packages? But
firefox isn't shipped with core OS.
JB
Em 04/05/2012 10:22, HSL GmbH - Lukas Ratajski escreveu:
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2009-release_engineering/
This should suffice and explain enough.
Jeronimo Baldino wrote:
> I just want to know: why OpenBSD provides Firefox 9.0.1 in packages when
> the latest stable release (12.0, according to Mozilla) was launched in
> April 24, 2012.
The packages for the OpenBSD 5.1 release were built in early February.
(Or, for slower architectures, th
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:29 +, Fergus Wilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if anyone can help me out with the following. Any or all
> help, including 'this has nothing
> to do with OBSD', or options to try passing
> to the dump, happily received. In particular, I wonder
> if my situation is
>
On Fri, 04 May 2012 01:18:25 -0300
Jeronimo Baldino wrote:
> I just want to know: why OpenBSD provides Firefox 9.0.1
You can find firefox 11 here or build from source/port.
http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/
You'll need to upgrade and follow current though first using
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:37:21PM +0200, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I'm proud to release the first public version of portable cwm 5.1.
>
> Portable cwm is a minor modification of the cwm version in OpenBSD CVS
> with a portable Makefile and a few compatibility features. It h
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Jeronimo Baldino
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just want to know: why OpenBSD provides Firefox 9.0.1 in packages when the
> latest stable release (12.0, according to Mozilla) was launched in April 24,
> 2012.
>
> Why older versions (3.5.19, 3.6.25) are still shipped with ?
-
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2009-release_engineering/
This should suffice and explain enough.
Hi,
I just want to know: why OpenBSD provides Firefox 9.0.1 in packages when
the latest stable release (12.0, according to Mozilla) was launched in
April 24, 2012.
Why older versions (3.5.19, 3.6.25) are still shipped with ?
Thank you,
JB
On 2012-05-04, Edward M wrote:
>> cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2600 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.60
>> GHz
>> cpu0:
>> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,NXE,LONG,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xT
The request was specifically for pids...
On 2012-05-04, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> I use pktstat from ports...
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>> The suggestion on this thread are interesting. But tcpdump -n is pretty
> manageable over a modem link and show
On 2012-05-04, Siju George wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:35 PM, David Coppa wrote:
>> It should be urtwn-firmware-1.1p1.tgz...
>>
>> Btw, just do a fw_update (man fw_update for info)
>>
>
> Thankyou David and Lawrence for the reply :-)
>
> an fw_update does basically nothing
>
> # fw_update
>
On 2012-05-04, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has found an elegant solution to the problem
> I'm having with interaction between CARP and OSPF. I have a pair of
> routers in a failover config. On one side they speak OSPF to a set of
> other routers and on the other side
hmm, on Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:37:45AM +0100, Laurence Rochfort said that
> I wouldn't recommend the iwn(4) devices. I've had a bad experience even
> with those in the man page.
>
> I recently replaced an iwn(4) with ral(4) and athn(4) as advised on misc
> and they've been excellent. No firmware
here is sysctl hw as well:
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2600 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
hw.ncpu=4
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.disknames=sd0:73fc4ae5314f89db
hw.diskcount=1
hw.sensors.acpitz0.temp0=40.00 degC (zone temperature)
hw.sensors.acpiac0.indicator0=O
On 04/05/12 13:35, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
yes, there's no doubt that this is a problem.
btw, can you try the unpatched kernel and put a switch between
the firewalls, i.e. connect pfsync interfaces through the switch.
will that work for you?
Sorry but I don't have two spare ports where the
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Kapetanakis Giannis
wrote:
> On 03/05/12 22:56, mxb wrote:
>>
>> I'd suggest you to experiment with the src and try to rollback if_pfsync.c
>> to,
>> say rev. 1.179,
>> then roll forward with revisions until you can pinpoint one which breaks
>> it.
>>
>> //maxim
>
On 03/05/12 22:56, mxb wrote:
I'd suggest you to experiment with the src and try to rollback if_pfsync.c to,
say rev. 1.179,
then roll forward with revisions until you can pinpoint one which breaks it.
//maxim
Ok, I've traced the problem back to r1.180 of if_pfsync.c
If I remove 1.180 and app
On 05/04/12 06:12, Jes wrote:
Hi all:
I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1
packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in
newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance
without kqemu is horrible. Any solution?
Yes, it w
Hi all:
I can't find kqemu between snapshots packages, ports, or even in 5.1
packages. I think I've read something about kqemu is deprecated in
newer versions of qemu (1.0.1) Is this correct? Because performance
without kqemu is horrible. Any solution?
Thanks in advance,
Jes
Hi All,
I'm wondering if anyone has found an elegant solution to the problem
I'm having with interaction between CARP and OSPF. I have a pair of
routers in a failover config. On one side they speak OSPF to a set of
other routers and on the other side use CARP to provide a default
gateway to a set
* Siju George [2012-05-04 08:44]:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Henning Brauer
> wrote:
> > diffs are for current of course but should work for 5.1 as well -
> > dunno what you are trying.
> I have upgraded my firewall to 5.1
> could you please give ma a unified diff or something I can try
Hello all,
I'm thinking of replacing my noisy and energy-hungry SOHO server with
an AMD Zacate E350-based solution; specifically ASUS E35M1-M.
Any experiences with this APU? A dmesg would be preferred.
--
Manolis Tzanidakis
http://mtzanidakis.com/
mtzanidakis[at]gmail[dot]com
47 matches
Mail list logo
