Re: How to deal with DDoS ?

2012-02-21 Thread Jan Stary
On Feb 22 02:21:04, Ville Valkonen wrote: > On 22 February 2012 01:22, Hassan Monfared wrote: > > net.inet.udp.recvspace=131072 # Increase based on your memory > > net.inet.udp.sendspace=131072 # Increase based on your memory > > System is running on obsd 5.0, thus these are obsolete. $ uname -a

Re: WARNING: CHECK AND RESET THE DATE! [not installation]

2012-02-21 Thread Jamie Gavahan
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:58, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/02/21 19:25, Aaron Mason wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > On 2012-02-20, Jan Stary wrote: >> >> I have seen this message after power-cycling an ALIX. >> >> If completely switched off (take th

Re: halt -p not powering down Sony Vaio (13 Feb snapshot)

2012-02-21 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
Try "sysctl -w machdep.apmhalt=1" before of "halt -p". I don't know if is correct or not, but /etc/sysctl.conf suggests this setting. Good luck :) -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:44:19 -0500 Josh Grosse wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:20 -0500 > > Josh Grosse wrote: > > > > > Because the error appeared to be an out-of-sync issue, I would have liked > > > to see the ou

Re: How to deal with DDoS ?

2012-02-21 Thread Ville Valkonen
On 22 February 2012 01:22, Hassan Monfared wrote: > net.inet.udp.recvspace=131072 # Increase based on your memory > net.inet.udp.sendspace=131072 # Increase based on your memory System is running on obsd 5.0, thus these are obsolete.

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Josh Grosse
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:20 -0500 > Josh Grosse wrote: > > > Because the error appeared to be an out-of-sync issue, I would have liked > > to see the output of: > > > > ls -l `which config` > > cat /usr/src/sys/CVS/Ta

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:20 -0500 Josh Grosse wrote: > My apologies if the redactions cause improper attributions, but > this has gotten very deep, and Dhu replied to himself. For readability > I've tried to wrap lines, too. > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:37:25PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbel

Re: How to deal with DDoS ?

2012-02-21 Thread Hassan Monfared
Hi, have you tried to set some tuning options in pf.conf & sysctl.conf ? eg: for sysctl.conf: net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=512 # Maximum allowed input queue length (256*number of physical interfaces) kern.bufcachepercent=90# Allow the kernel to use up to 90% of the RAM for cache (default 10%)

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Josh Grosse
My apologies if the redactions cause improper attributions, but this has gotten very deep, and Dhu replied to himself. For readability I've tried to wrap lines, too. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:37:25PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:52:27 -0600 > Carson Chittom wr

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread patrick keshishian
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:52:27 -0600 > Carson Chittom wrote: > >> Duncan Patton a Campbell writes: >> >> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 >> > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 >> >>

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:52:27 -0600 Carson Chittom wrote: > Duncan Patton a Campbell writes: > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 > > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > >> Ted Unangst wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campb

Re: How to deal with DDoS ?

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:57:05PM +0100, Roger S. wrote: > I am facing regular and consequent DDoS, and I would like to know how > the OpenBSD community deal with these. Hints and inputs welcome. > > The obvious first : my input pipes are not filled, there is plenty of > bandwith available for my

Actualización de Almacenes e Inventarios. Taller Personalizado

2012-02-21 Thread Ing. Karla Quintero
[IMAGE] Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de Capacitacisn presenta: De la Planeacisn al Control, Almacenes e Inventarios 5 de Marzo, Ciudad de Mixico. Si esta informacisn no compete a su area y la considera de valor le agradecemos compartirla. Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico es una empresa Regis

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Carson Chittom
Duncan Patton a Campbell writes: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 >> Ted Unangst wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: >> > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 >> > > Ted Unangst wrot

Cobranza Contundente en Monterrey y Guadalajara, Inscríbase Ahora!

2012-02-21 Thread Lic. Yolanda Martinez
[IMAGE] Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de Capacitacisn presenta: Ticnicas Contundentes de Cobranza y Retencisn de Clientes 27 de Febrero Guadalajara / 5 de Marzo Monterrey. Si esta informacisn no compete a su area y la considera de valor le agradecemos compartirla. Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:38:25 + Miod Vallat wrote: > > There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that > > it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs > > and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not > > build witho

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Guenther
Going back to the first message in the thread... On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: ... > then do the kernel make > # cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf > # config GENERIC > config: symlink(machine -> ../../../../arch/amd64/include): File exists > config: symlink(amd64

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Nick Holland
On 02/21/2012 01:28 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: ... There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not build without the tre

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:38:25 + Miod Vallat wrote: > > There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that > > it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs > > and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not > > build witho

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:53:48 -0800 > Philip Guenther wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 >> > Ted Unangst wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 201

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Miod Vallat
> There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that > it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs > and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not > build without the tree being first primed with the 5.0-Release code. Of co

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:53:48 -0800 Philip Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell > wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > >> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 >

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 > > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > > >> you are running config from a

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Guenther
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > Ted Unangst wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: >> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 >> > Ted Unangst wrote: >> > >> >> you are running config from a different

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 Ted Unangst wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > >> you are running config from a different version than the source you > >> are trying to compile. > > > > Ok, but i

iPad Kiralıyoruz

2012-02-21 Thread Ebru Özen
Resimleri gvremiyor musunuz? "Resimleri gvster"i segin ya da bu iletiyi tarayD1cD1nD1zda gvr|nt|leyin. Bilgilendirme e-postalarD1nD1 almak istemiyorsanD1z l|tfen tD1klayD1n. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]

Re: USB-RS232 strange behaviour

2012-02-21 Thread Paul de Weerd
Hi Rod, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:25:50PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote: | I have been using a USB-RS232 dongle for quite a while since DE9 | connectors started going away on laptops. | | Typically I use "cu -l cuaU0" to connect and everything is fine. | | Today I tried to use the same (dongle and

Re: specific X.org segmentation fault

2012-02-21 Thread Mihai Popescu
> Increase the limits in login.conf for the relevant login class; > you'll need to logout and back in for them to take effect. > You've hit both datasize and openfiles limits. How much to increase them ? The login.conf is the one put by the install. This error will fire even with one tab open in x

Re: USB-RS232 strange behaviour

2012-02-21 Thread Mihai Popescu
Did you try to connect to that Soekris using your laptop? Maybe there is nothing wrong with the dongle ... A dmesg snip with that dongle detection would be interesting, too. .

Re: USB-RS232 strange behaviour

2012-02-21 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:25:50 +1100 "Rod Whitworth" wrote: > I have been using a USB-RS232 dongle for quite a while since DE9 > connectors started going away on laptops. What chip is your dongle built on? When you connect it, do you see something in the logs/some changes in dmesg? > Any educate

USB-RS232 strange behaviour

2012-02-21 Thread Rod Whitworth
I have been using a USB-RS232 dongle for quite a while since DE9 connectors started going away on laptops. Typically I use "cu -l cuaU0" to connect and everything is fine. Today I tried to use the same (dongle and command) on an old desktop to talk to a Soekris 4801. The message I got was "/dev/

Re: WARNING: CHECK AND RESET THE DATE! [not installation]

2012-02-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/02/21 19:25, Aaron Mason wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > > On 2012-02-20, Jan Stary wrote: > >> I have seen this message after power-cycling an ALIX. > >> If completely switched off (take the power cord out), > >> the message appears on the next boo

carp and disk drive fault

2012-02-21 Thread Илья Шипицин
hello! today we encountered situation with faulty drives. we met it earluer, but today was very strange, carp was running, but applications were not running due to disk failure. it seems that carp firewall/router is a good solution, but running applications on carp server is not very good. does

Re: WARNING: CHECK AND RESET THE DATE! [not installation]

2012-02-21 Thread Aaron Mason
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012-02-20, Jan Stary wrote: >> I have seen this message after power-cycling an ALIX. >> If completely switched off (take the power cord out), >> the message appears on the next boot. On subsequent soft >> reboots (without taking the