I wonder if /etc/rc.conf.local included into hostname.xxx scripts ?
if so, I could use
advskew=100 in rc.conf.local and
$advskew in hostname.xxx later
14 FEWRALQ 2012 G. 23:29 POLXZOWATELX Stuart Henderson
NAPISAL:
> On 2012-02-13, P P;Q Q P(P8P?P8Q P8P= wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'd like t
Aumenta tus posibilidades de crecer profesionalmente.
GuCa de ComprensiC3n de Estados Financieros para Directores No
Financieros
La habilidad de revisar estados financieros y tomar decisiones
inteligentes es esencial para los Directores y Gerentes que dirigen el
rumbo de sus compaC1Cas, sin embar
On 14 February 2012 12:48, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>
> Boags if you like!
The true nectar - the OpenBSD of beers ;~)
Marc Espie writes:
> And out-of-date will tell you which of your ports you need to rebuild.
>
> One longer, more sure-fire procedure would be to
> pkg_info -q -m -P -a >list
> pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/*
> dpb -I list
I'm looking at the dpb man page on 5.0-stable. Did you mean "-P" on
that last li
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:14:06PM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> So what I said above will NOT work with these troublesome packages?
> I have been using all of the make commands when working on ports, stuff
> like make uninstall, etc.
> The Porters Handbook seems to suggest that roughly this proced
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:32:52PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:50:31AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:06:26PM +1030, Giridhari wrote:
> > > HELO,
> > >
> > > whatbs the correct procedure for keeping ports that are installed up
to
> > date
> > >
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
image001.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
image002.jpg]
On 14 February 2012 17:59, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to test a commercial router for throughtput and I decided to
> put it between 2 OpenBSD systems running network benchmark software.
> Looking on openports.se I found iperf, netperf and ttcp. Could you
> suggest one from them, based o
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:16:15 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-02-14, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> > unbound-control should be renamed to more convenient 'unboundctl'.
>
> and break scripts that are meant to work with cross-OS deployments?
nah, he is talking bout convinience, not sani
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:23:34 +0200, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> OpenBSD 5.1-beta (GENERIC.MP) #5: Tue Feb 7 08:26:54 EST 2012
>>r...@nero.witworx.com:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
>Is it a custom built kernel ?
No way. I just update from CVS and build as per the FAQ instructions.
I
Hi,
I need to test a commercial router for throughtput and I decided to
put it between 2 OpenBSD systems running network benchmark software.
Looking on openports.se I found iperf, netperf and ttcp. Could you
suggest one from them, based on your experience, please ?
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:50:31AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:06:26PM +1030, Giridhari wrote:
> > HELO,
> >
> > whatbs the correct procedure for keeping ports that are installed up to
> date
> > when the system is updated with CVS?
> >
> > Do I need to make uninstall
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:06:26PM +1030, Giridhari wrote:
> HELO,
>
> whatbs the correct procedure for keeping ports that are installed up to
date
> when the system is updated with CVS?
>
> Do I need to make uninstall the ports, perform the cvs update, build the
new
> system and then make the new
On 2012-02-13, PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P= wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to sync /etc/hostname.carpXXX files between MASTER and BACKUP, the
> only difference, of course is "advskew" paramter. Is there a way to specify
> it in different config file ?
>
> I seen bug report on fwbuilder (www.fwbuilder.or
On 2012-02-14, Adriaan wrote:
> On 2/14/12, Brynet wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:34:59PM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
>>> ...
>>> OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC.MP) #187: Sat Feb 11 12:30:14 MST 2012
>>> apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
>>> acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
>>> ..
>>>
>>>
Your ftp-proxy anchor is too late, move it *before* the match...nat-to rules
On 2012-02-14, Nikola KneE>eviD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into a problem on a Soekris firewall I manage. It is a Soekris
> net6501, running OpenBSD 5.0-stable.
> On this machine, I run pf and ftp-proxy (ftp-proxy=""
On 2012-02-14, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> unbound-control should be renamed to more convenient 'unboundctl'.
and break scripts that are meant to work with cross-OS deployments?
I tried NetBSD and FreeBSD also. Same problem on NetBSD, but works on FreeBSD.
Is it hard to port FreeBSD's uaudio (/src/sys/dev/sound/usb/uaudio.c)
to OpenBSD?
Could anyone port it or fix this?
2012/1/26, Gregor Pintar :
> More info with UAUDIO_DEBUG enabled.
>
> dmesg:
> uaudio0 at uhub2 port
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012, Vitali wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Peter van Oord van der Vlies
> > Why replacing bind ?
> https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2012-1033
Bad CVE choice...
That's a design issue in DNS, not a vulnerability in BIND.
And if you want to throw CVEs a
> OpenBSD 5.1-beta (GENERIC.MP) #5: Tue Feb 7 08:26:54 EST 2012
>r...@nero.witworx.com:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
Is it a custom built kernel ?
Hi,
I'm running into a problem on a Soekris firewall I manage. It is a Soekris
net6501, running OpenBSD 5.0-stable.
On this machine, I run pf and ftp-proxy (ftp-proxy="" in rc.conf.local). There
are 4 NICs on this machine, one is for the internal traffic, one for the DMZ,
one for the phone network
Henning Brauer wrote [2012-02-14 13:52+0100]:
> anything depending on PYTHON
MY WOMAN!
> (gimme a break)
Aeh.
Man.
> will never make it into base anyway.
If it were true!
--steffen
Si no puede ver esta informacisn haga click aqum
[IMAGE]
OPTIMICE SUS TIEMPOS
Envme su Declaracisn Informativa de Sueldos y Salarios con Carga Batch
Corporativo Fiscal Dicada (COFIDE) pone a su disposicisn de forma
gratuita la "Carga Batch" para que presente oportunamente su Declaracisn
Anual de
* Peter van Oord van der Vlies [2012-02-14
09:11]:
> Why replacing bind ?
1) because it's shit (yes yes vixie, the next release won't be written
by drunken grad students and fix all design and implementation issues,
we hear that since bind4 at least)
2) it's a dead end anyway - i have neve
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:34:43 +, Fred Crowson wrote:
>On 14 February 2012 11:41, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> There goes $552.59 ... ;((
>>
>> I guess I'd bettr watch the commit messages closely for good news. We
>> live in hope.
>>
>> Thanx for the message, even if it's bad news. I don't have to t
On 14 February 2012 11:41, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> There goes $552.59 ... ;((
>
> I guess I'd bettr watch the commit messages closely for good news. We
> live in hope.
>
> Thanx for the message, even if it's bad news. I don't have to try lots
> of desperate tricks to investigate further.
The publi
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:48:35 +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>It's a known bug with Intel Sandybridge: support for this GPU is far
>from being optimal.
>
There goes $552.59 ... ;((
I guess I'd bettr watch the commit messages closely for good news. We
live in hope.
Thanx for the message, even if it's
Hello!
is anybody using linux xterm (or gnu terminal) + openbsd "vi" ?
it breaks "home/end" keys.
Google says things about utf-8 and non-utf8 terminals, some people tell to
fix terminfo/termcap.
I do not have any idea, what exactly to fix there.
I tried things, without result.
any advice ?
Ily
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> dmesg is under the story, of course.
>
> I have been following 5.0 current through 5.1 beta updating from CVS
> and
> building through to release and a CD so that I can track stuff.
>
> When my smooth red new Thinkpad arrived I decided to us
dmesg is under the story, of course.
I have been following 5.0 current through 5.1 beta updating from CVS
and
building through to release and a CD so that I can track stuff.
When my smooth red new Thinkpad arrived I decided to use it to try out
my latest 5.1beta CD. So I shoved win7 aside and le
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:23:01PM +0400, Mo Libden wrote:
> 14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov
:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
> > Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why replacing bind ?
> >
> > Because bind is full of security related bugs a
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:01 +0400
Mo Libden wrote:
> 14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov
> :
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
> > Peter van Oord van der Vlies
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why replacing bind ?
> >
> > Because bind is full of security related bugs
On 2012 Feb 14 (Tue) at 13:23:01 +0400 (+0400), Mo Libden wrote:
:14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov
:
:> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
:> Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
:>
:> > Hello,
:> >
:> > Why replacing bind ?
:>
:> Because bind is full of security related bugs and
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
> A year ago, with a 4.9 snapshot the acpi stuff on that box was
> configured, and both CPUs detected.
For some reason the probe for apm fails on your system in 4.9, so acpi
was allowed to attach.
In later releases, it seems the probe for
14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov :
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
> Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Why replacing bind ?
>
> Because bind is full of security related bugs and a bloatware.
Oh come on!
They say about the same thing about sendmail f
Let's not crosspost replies, misc is more suitable for this one.
CCs trimmed.
On 2012/02/14 08:09, Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why replacing bind ?
The version we have is in need of an update. Due to some of the design
decisions made for BIND 10 that's not really going to be
2012/2/13 Stuart Henderson :
...
>> After tar/gzip the source files and Makefile wrappers weigh ~4.6MB. A bit
to
>> large to send to this list. if anyone feels like looking at the workb&do
not
>> hesitate to mail me.
>
> Please do. It would be nice to put them on a public server.
>
WIP can be foun
On 2/14/12, Brynet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:34:59PM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
>> ...
>> OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC.MP) #187: Sat Feb 11 12:30:14 MST 2012
>> apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
>> acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
>> ..
>>
>> I need the machine right now for testing
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:06:26PM +1030, Giridhari wrote:
> whatbs the correct procedure for keeping ports that are installed up to
date
> when the system is updated with CVS?
Use packages. Set your PKG_PATH to something appropriate - since I'm based in
northern Europe,
the .profile for a i386 b
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why replacing bind ?
Because bind is full of security related bugs and a bloatware.
Yours C. O.
> Kind Regards
>
> Peter
>
> - Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> Van: Bjvrn Ketelaars [mailto:bjorn.ketela...@h
HELO,
whatbs the correct procedure for keeping ports that are installed up to date
when the system is updated with CVS?
Do I need to make uninstall the ports, perform the cvs update, build the new
system and then make the new ports?
Giridhari
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Peter van Oord van der Vlies
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why replacing bind ?
That's a good question, Peter. Welcome aboard.
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2012-1033
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Peter
--
### Coonardoo - PQP8P=P8QP:P0 Q QQP=Q / The Well
Hello,
Why replacing bind ?
Kind Regards
Peter
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Bjvrn Ketelaars [mailto:bjorn.ketela...@hydroxide.nl]
Verzonden: Monday, February 13, 2012 10:35 PM
Aan: misc@openbsd.org
; t...@openbsd.org
Onderwerp: Unbound in base
Hello,
After some recent discussions
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Giridhari wrote:
> $ ls -F src/games/snake/
>
> did you `make build' without `make obj' first?
>
> --patrick
>
> I'm not sure why I would do that. CVS doesn't build anything. Can you
> explain a bit about why you suggest that? Please excuse me if I don't know
> wh
On 14/02/2012, at 8:41 PM, Giridhari wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean. Are you suggesting I should read up on how to
> operate cvs, or is there something specific about CVS and OPenBSD I should
> be aware of? I'm following the faq. I have updated several times in the
past
> with CVS with no tro
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
BjC6rn Ketelaars wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After some recent discussions [1, 2] on the topic of unbound in base,
> and (more important) really liking the idea of an alternative for
> BIND in base, I made a start with fitting the different pieces of the
> puzzle. What
46 matches
Mail list logo
