Excuse my good old-fashioned American turkeyness of last year, but if it's not
secure by default, it does indeed belong on the website. Why can't we set
machdep.allowaperture=1 for n00bs whose first priority is to use X Windows
without getting hacked in the kernel from all those stray pointers esc
For kinds of reasons, my disk is partitionized like this:
1st partition is for Windows system(Primary)
2nd is for OpenBSD(Primary)
3rd is Windows extended partition(Extended)
4th is originally not used, now I created a new one and mark it as
"A6".(Primary)
Question is after I created the 4th part
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 7:16 PM, John Doe wrote:
> The keyboard mapping in the kernel is getting correpted when I use X
Windows
> Version 11 Release 6 Xenocara. B I am using a Microsoft(R) Digital Media
> Keyboard 3000. B How do I map the extra keys? and would it help if I used
> machdep.allowaper
On 23 January 2012 04:04, Lars wrote:
>
> It would be cool to see more BSD consulting companies and support
> companies, and web hosting companies. If I was to look for an OpenBSD web
> hosting company, I'd have difficulty finding one. There are far too many
> LINUX web hosts out there. BSD seems
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
...
> The yelling and namecalling is unfortunate. But from observation and
> professional experience, if you want professional grade support for a
> software livecycle of over 3 years, you should be willing to pay for
> it.
>
>
It would be cool to see more BSD consulting c
Hi Dear Customer, Are you out shopping today? We have some exciting news
for you! Well before you go out, you should watch this:
http://beyonx.com/mobile Check it out here: http://beyonx.com/mobile
Enjoy the rest of the weekend. Regards, Mark
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:38 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>
>>
> There is no way of knowing if it would have found the problem, so why
> continue with this drivel? Contrary to the lengthy diatribes here trying
> to distract from the original problem an
A new statement is available.
To view, click on the "ACCOUNTS"
tab and then click on "Statements" to verify your transaction.
Lammert, I am going to have to ask you to leave our lists.
You are no longer welcome here.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
There is no way of knowing if it would have found the problem, so why
continue with this drivel? Contrary to the lengthy diatribes here trying
to distract from the original problem an solution:
1) The problem with locate was traced to a bunch of sess
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> a recent system does a fsck -fp of each partition, so it would have
>> fixed your problem.
>>
> Would 4.4? 4.5? I don't think so,
You keep stating things that you believe to be true without doing
Been playing with 5.1-beta (Jan. 21 build) in the interests of seeing
what I need to get together to set up my next system. I was hoping to
do it with three drives, booting from a softraid RAID 5 volume.
When installed and rebooted, all works OK. What I've been running into
are panics when tryin
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> a recent system does a fsck -fp of each partition, so it would have
> fixed your problem.
>
Would 4.4? 4.5? I don't think so, .. if you recall, the system is 4.3 so a
normal upgrade (i.e. not a clean install) would not have fixed the
problem.
> you are
>> For those that happen to google this thread trying to find the
>> solution: upgrading *would* have fixed his system due to the various
>> steps done during upgrades,
>>
> BZZZT! WRONG! If the system rebooted clean [which this one did], the
> problem would not have been found during a normal upgr
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
> And yet you, L.V. Lammert, use the code, don't clearly explain what
> was failing on your system, and behave in exactly the way you rant
> about.
>
Now THAT's quite laughahble! The ONLY problem here is with all the IDIOTS
spouting CRAP with no interest
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Anonymous wrote:
> Whooever told him to man up was justified.
>
HUH?? WTF?? That's a CROCK!!
It's amuzing to watch the flames flying, however, there *ARE* some people
on the list that have an interest in solving problems.
It IS unfortunate, however, that the actual PROBLEM a
Remco, using aucat did the jobvery simple "fix" was to use your
suggestion and insert aucat_flags= into /etc/rc.conf.local
And I used default for the audio device in /usr/local/share/gpsk31/gpsk.conf
Thanks for the direct and simple suggestion!
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Remco wrote:
> And yet you, L.V. Lammert,
I am not Lammert. I don't approve of the way Lammert handled the issue but
that is separate from the fairly regular piss parades and walls of text
taking place here when a simple answer would work. The consensus of the
vocal parties is that contribution = abuseLicense
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Anonymous wrote:
> I asked this before but I guess you didn't see it. So if you contribute
> "much more code to OpenBSD" than someone else do you automatically get
> license to insult people and post 100% noise as some kind of reward?
Since you're such an incredib
Tracy Bales wrote:
> OK...I did a system reboot. And now I'm finding out that the azalia
> driver
> will not change the sample rate from 48 KHz to 8 KHz. I also tried using
> audioctl record.sample_rate=8000 but it returns with record.sample_rate:
> 48000 -> 48000
>
> So, is the problem with th
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Anonymous wrote:
> Lars, you ass-licking dog, what I am saying to you and prima donnas like you
> is you can be a good human being and that is more important than all the
> patches and code in the world. <...>
And yet you, L.V. Lammert, use the code, don't clear
21 matches
Mail list logo
