Si usted no visualiza bien este mail, haga click aqum
Hosting desde $100.000 anuales con CPanel
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] Servicio de Correos masivos - Email Marketing
Consiga mas clientes o fidelice sus actuales, con Promociones,
Propuestas, Alertas, Noticias, Novedades de la empresa, Inv
Maybe you should try snort2pf from pkg ?
Information for
http://ftp.spline.de/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/packages/i386/snort2pf-4.5p0.tgz
Comment:
block "nasty" hosts with pf(4) based on Snort's rules
Description:
Snort2Pf is a small Perl daemon which greps Snort's alertfile and
blocks
the "naughty" h
CC3mo Pagar a la Fuerza de Ventas.
B!Es muy simple! Le presentamos un renovado programa que le darC! a conocer de
manera integral, todas las variables que deben considerarse en el momento de
pagarle a la FUERZA DE VENTAS. Toda empresa que basa una parte importante de
sus ganancias en la labor de s
ughthat's what I thought.
I'm reading through some OSSEC docs right now and it seems pretty promising.
Having trouble finding anything about having it read from pflog.
From: Andres Genovez [andresgeno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 3:04 PM
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There wouldn't be much point saying "on -current" if it worked in 5.0.
> You won't see much output for em(4) though, we don't use offloading
> there.
We use it on the receive side, but that doesn't show up in hwfeatures.
For transmission, TCP/UDP checksumming is disabl
2012/1/3 Bentley, Dain
> I've been looking around for a good tutorial on implementing snort with PF
> and
> everything I see is old, does anyone know of or have implemented a solution
> using an IDS/IPS with PF on the same box? If possible I'd like snort of
> some
> other IDS inspect packets and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:57:16 -0500
schrieb "Bentley, Dain" :
> I've been looking around for a good tutorial on implementing snort
> with PF and everything I see is old, does anyone know of or have
> implemented a solution using an IDS/IPS with
On 1. jan. 2012, at 23.40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-01-01, Pete Vickers wrote:
>> snippet from /etc/named-gn.conf :
>> controls {
>> inet 10.20.30.2 port 954 allow {10.20.30.2;} keys {"rndc-key";};
>> };
>>
>> then it also fails and complains thus:
>>
>> Jan 1 09:01:49 ns0 named[8504]
Le Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:54:18 +0100,
Henning Brauer a icrit :
Hello,
> * Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-01-03 17:45]:
> > I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges,
> > for example with an exclude boundary range : port1 >< port2
>
> nope.
>
> Ports and ranges of po
For those of us playing the CS home game. Is this an example of
left-to right evaluation? My thought on this was that the value 81
isn't greater than 82 and isn't less than 80, so the rule doesn't
match.
* Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-01-03 17:45]:
> I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges, for
> example with an exclude boundary range : port1 >< port2
nope.
Ports and ranges of ports are specified using these operators:
: (range including
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the child will be inheriting the rdomain from the process
> which forked it.
>
I can offer the anecdote that when I ran sshd using the route -exec
wrapper my child session would exist in whatever rdomain was hosting
the da
Hello, happy new year.
I think there is a off-by-one error in Packet Filter port ranges, for
example with an exclude boundary range : port1 >< port2
PF or pfctl does not check that port1 <= port2 and if port1 > port2 the
port range is not correct.
For example 82 >< 80 is not the same as 80 >< 8
I've been looking around for a good tutorial on implementing snort with PF and
everything I see is old, does anyone know of or have implemented a solution
using an IDS/IPS with PF on the same box? If possible I'd like snort of some
other IDS inspect packets and have pf drop them based on the fact
> > If you don't have signal to add to the thread at least don't add to the
> > noise.
>
> Could you please follow your own advise and simply STFU?
>
> --
> Rafal Bisingier
As long as you shitheads keep your gang bang going the STFU is going to have
to come from you.
> Are we a tourette treatment center?
Why don't you add it to your .sig shithead ;-)
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
> "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
> -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
On 2012-01-03, ??? wrote:
> 2012/1/2 Christian Weisgerber :
>> Ilya Shipitsin wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running servers with "em" NICs. People on list reported things
>>> like
>>>
> "hwfeatures=8037
> ",
>>> I do not see such options in ifconfig output.
>>
>> Try "ifconfig em0 hwfeatures" on -c
> Apple's iPhone is "slave-labor hardware" too: how much does it cost?
Too right. How many people have thrown themselves from Foxconn's towers?
> ...As well as all the other electronic gadgets on the market, btw...
Not all but many. It is worthwhile looking into how what we buy affects
people.
> I know a bunch of people with SGI O2's that might let them go for
> that. How many do you want?
Not familiar with those. I'll have a look thanks.
> I never mean to disturb you with what is going on in my family but I am
> crying out loud to request your help. My twin sister has been suffering
> from breast cancer for a while and its become worse so we had to conclude
> on her surgery for her to get cured as said by the doctors but the cost i
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Instead you motherfuckers are lecturing me on why I should pay 200 or
> 250 bucks for 5 dollars worth of slave-labor hardware as if you're all
> shareholders.
Apple's iPhone is "slave-labor hardware" too: how much does it cost?
...As well as
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:59:40 +0100
Vitali wrote:
> Wouldn't you consider AMANDA http://www.amanda.org
> I had been using it for long in my previous support engineering life.
> It's nice.
Yeah, AMANDA is great, but seems to be an overkill when you just need
to backup one or 2 servers, or your c
Hi,
On, 03 Jan 2012 o 08:59 CET
Anonymous wrote:
> If you don't have signal to add to the thread at least don't add to the noise.
Could you please follow your own advise and simply STFU?
--
Rafal Bisingier
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:10:19 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >
> > Why not? They're using their own chip design. I doubt they pay MIPS.inc
> > for a license but maybe they do.
>
> FYI, they has a MIPS license.
Thank you. I stand corrected.
Are we a tourette treatment center?
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external
Henning Brauer wrote:
> > I feel the price is too high
>
> then don't buy a lemote, case closed.
The question was about where to get a good price on one. Scroll up asshole.
> the person you insulted.
I insulted nobody except people who attacked me for daring to express the
opinion that the pr
26 matches
Mail list logo
