Personal Branding para Asistentes " Tu sello personal en el trabajo" en Guadalajara.

2011-11-17 Thread Lic. Luna Rodriguez
[IMAGE] Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de Capacitacisn presenta: Congreso Nacional Secretarias Ejecutivas y Asistentes 8 de Diciembre Guadalajara, Jalisco. -Mas de 900 asistentes satisfechas nos respaldansupera con ixito los retos del 2012. -Obtenga las herramientas necesarias para alcanzar un s

Re: Multi Link PPP support in Kernel

2011-11-17 Thread Scott McEachern
On 11/17/11 19:43, Stuart Henderson wrote: wow, people really still use multilink? i remember it being a fair hassle on the lns side back when we did it with dialup... over here (UK) the few people doing this sort of thing use per-packet IP load-balancing these days. Over here (Canada; Ontar

Re: Huawei EM770W mobile modem

2011-11-17 Thread Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:27:32AM +0600, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I own a Acer Aspire ao532H netbook, and it has >> a Huawei EM770W mobile wcdma modem built-in. >> I think its internally connected via USB. Checked with

Re: OpenBSD 5.0 upgrade: em interface status "no carrier"

2011-11-17 Thread Sam Vaughan
On 18/11/2011, at 12:59 PM, Sam Vaughan wrote: > Hi, > > After upgrading from OpenBSD 4.9 to OpenBSD 5.0, the "Intel 82579LM" and "Intel PRO/1000 MT (82574L)" devices on one of my servers no longer come up. If I'd bothered to compare those two dmesg outputs more closely I'd have noticed that Op

Dhcpd.conf

2011-11-17 Thread Bill Meigs
If the name after "host" starts with a number, I get an error in /var/log/messages and dhcpd fails to load. host 5tbgx280 { hardware ethernet 00:11:43:2f:87:d5; fixed-address 192.168.1.112; } Nov 17 10:53:57 pj dhcpd[8557]: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 115: expecting left brace

OpenBSD 5.0 upgrade: em interface status "no carrier"

2011-11-17 Thread Sam Vaughan
Hi, After upgrading from OpenBSD 4.9 to OpenBSD 5.0, the "Intel 82579LM" and "Intel PRO/1000 MT (82574L)" devices on one of my servers no longer come up. The ifconfig output simply shows "status: no carrier". Without network access I can't copy and paste an entire dmesg, so here's some cherry-pic

Re: Multi Link PPP support in Kernel

2011-11-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-11-17, Russell Sutherland wrote: > Is it possible to enable multilink PPP using the kernel based: pppoe(4) ? no, not supported. > Or does one have to resort to the userland pppoe/ppp(8) ? wow, people really still use multilink? i remember it being a fair hassle on the lns side back whe

Multi Link PPP support in Kernel

2011-11-17 Thread Russell Sutherland
Is it possible to enable multilink PPP using the kernel based: pppoe(4) ? Or does one have to resort to the userland pppoe/ppp(8) ? -- Russell Sutherand I+TS e: russell.sutherl...@utoronto.ca t: +1.416.978.0470 f: +1.416.978.6620 m: +1.416.803.0080

Re : OpenBSD ipsec gateway behind a router

2011-11-17 Thread Mik J
> Hello, > > Joosep, thank you for pointing out this incompatibility. I have made tests with > Fabio and that was the problem. > > Regarding the ipsec configuration behind nat routers it has been tested > successfully between a 4.9 and a 4.4 openbsd with udp encapsulation and between > a 4.9 o

Re: opensmtpd

2011-11-17 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:30:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > When I think it is a worthy complement to the official docs, I will let > > > misc@ and tech@

Re: opensmtpd

2011-11-17 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:30:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > When I think it is a worthy complement to the official docs, I will let > > misc@ and tech@ know. For now you can assume it does not exist, I don't > > know when i

Re: opensmtpd

2011-11-17 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > When I think it is a worthy complement to the official docs, I will let > misc@ and tech@ know. For now you can assume it does not exist, I don't > know when it'll be ready as I only work on it when I'm bored from code. Bored of cod

Re: opensmtpd

2011-11-17 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:27:47PM +0400, Wesley M. wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > I seen http://www.opensmtpd.org > > Does exist a "stable" version ? > can we put it on production ? > The very first line on the website says: "OpenSMTPD has not had a stable release yet !" I guess it is sel

Re: opensmtpd

2011-11-17 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Check: 1) archives of misc@ 2) man smtpd 3) man smtpd.conf 4) as it's work in progress use current 5) some people use it in production On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Wesley M. wrote: > Hi, > > I seen http://www.opensmtpd.org > > Does exist a "stable" version ? > can we put it on production ? >

opensmtpd

2011-11-17 Thread Wesley M.
Hi, I seen http://www.opensmtpd.org Does exist a "stable" version ? can we put it on production ? And what's about your handbook : https://www.poolp.org/OpenSMTPD/ Possible to have this hanbook in french ? Thank you very much for replies. All the best, Wesley M.